Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

halfmanhalfbronco

Hunter Biden (alleged) Emails released by NY POST.

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, UNLV2001 said:

 

BWAAAAHAHAHA Brennan and Clapper are the top two names. You guys never learn. Here’s the buried lede.

While the letter’s signatories presented no new evidence, they said their national security experience had made them “deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case” and cited several elements of the story that suggested the Kremlin’s hand at work.

Seemingly most of these people could just ask Biden if it was true, some of them advise his campaign. But here’s the rub...

Top Biden advisers who staffed him during his vice presidency, citing their own recollections as well as a review of Biden’s official schedules, have sharply rejected suggestions that Biden ever met with a representative of Burisma in 2015 or has otherwise been involved in Hunter Biden’s business interests.

Why would you even have to go back and look if the release weren’t true? At least they were smart enough to not put the shady meeting on the official schedule. :hahaha:

We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thelawlorfaithful said:

BWAAAAHAHAHA Brennan and Clapper are the top two names. You guys never learn. Here’s the buried lede.

While the letter’s signatories presented no new evidence, they said their national security experience had made them “deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case” and cited several elements of the story that suggested the Kremlin’s hand at work.

Seemingly most of these people could just ask Biden if it was true, some of them advise his campaign. But here’s the rub...

Top Biden advisers who staffed him during his vice presidency, citing their own recollections as well as a review of Biden’s official schedules, have sharply rejected suggestions that Biden ever met with a representative of Burisma in 2015 or has otherwise been involved in Hunter Biden’s business interests.

Why would you even have to go back and look if the release weren’t true? At least they were smart enough to not put the shady meeting on the official schedule. :hahaha:

I'm not convinced until Alex Jones verifies the validity of everything :banhammer:

Who is Alex Jones? Infowars host interviewed by Megyn Kelly, explained image.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are making a big deal Biden's attorney supposedly asking for the laptop back.  Well, if Giuliani and the blind guy are claiming to have Hunter Biden's property wouldn't the attorney asking for it back prompt them to hand it over?  If Giuliani claims the laptop belongs to Hunter why wouldn't the attorney call his bluff and demand the return of the laptop?  The real story here is why they aren't letting anyone else examine the supposed "smoking gun"  everyone is just supposed to take their word for it when there are very likely some Russian fingerprints on that laptop.  Giuliani and the crew are being pretty tight fisted with that raw data....hmmmm  

Posted Image
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Akkula said:

People are making a big deal Biden's attorney supposedly asking for the laptop back.  Well, if Giuliani and the blind guy are claiming to have Hunter Biden's property wouldn't the attorney asking for it back prompt them to hand it over?  If Giuliani claims the laptop belongs to Hunter why wouldn't the attorney call his bluff and demand the return of the laptop.  The real story here is why they aren't letting anyone else examine the supposed "smoking gun"  everyone is just supposed to take their word for it when there are very likely some Russian fingerprints on that laptop.  Giuliani and the crew are being pretty tight fisted with that raw data....hmmmm  

Personally, with all the Rudy G & Q evidence..............I am going on record that I refuse to vote for Hunter Biden in this election  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, son of a gun said:

So, when can we expect Alex Jones to come out publicly?

As soon as you post one funny thing in the political humor thread. Just one.

The left really can’t meme.

We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Akkula said:

People are making a big deal Biden's attorney supposedly asking for the laptop back.  Well, if Giuliani and the blind guy are claiming to have Hunter Biden's property wouldn't the attorney asking for it back prompt them to hand it over?  If Giuliani claims the laptop belongs to Hunter why wouldn't the attorney call his bluff and demand the return of the laptop?  The real story here is why they aren't letting anyone else examine the supposed "smoking gun"  everyone is just supposed to take their word for it when there are very likely some Russian fingerprints on that laptop.  Giuliani and the crew are being pretty tight fisted with that raw data....hmmmm  

I could see Rudy agreeing to hand over the laptop and showing up with a waffle iron. That's how far gone he is. He still probably has his secretary check his My Space account for friend requests

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Del Scorcho said:

 

Yes, questions. Did anybody get an answer out of Biden or Hunter denying their veracity. We’ve got a lot of reporting about Giuliani and a computer repair place, but not much journalisming looking into the actual story. Seems like there should be people with jobs for doing something like that :hmmm:

We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thelawlorfaithful said:

Yes, questions. Did anybody get an answer out of Biden or Hunter denying their veracity. We’ve got a lot of reporting about Giuliani and a computer repair place, but not much journalisming looking into the actual story. Seems like there should be people with jobs for doing something like that :hmmm:

maybe that team from Finding Bigfoot? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Del Scorcho said:

maybe that team from Finding Bigfoot? 

Give them some coke, a hooker, and an unqualified foreign business position as bait; they’ll catch the mythical Hunter and we’ll get some answers. 

We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Maji said:

Already posted and hilariously mocked. Here’s the one part I missed though, cuz this deja vu is too funny.

But the release of the material, which POLITICO has not independently verified, has drawn comparisons to 2016, when Russian hackers dumped troves of emails from Democrats onto the internet

All of which was accurate. Not disinformation, just information.

— producing few damaging revelations but fueling accusations of corruption by Trump. While there has been no immediate indication of Russian involvement in the release of emails the Post obtained,

Gee...you think. Nice story you got there guys, be a shame if this sequel sucked as bad as the first.

its general thrust mirrors a narrative that U.S. intelligence agencies have described as part of an active Russian disinformation effort aimed at denigrating Biden’s candidacy.

We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement,” the letter reads. But, it continues, “there are a number of factors that make us suspicious of Russian involvement.”

Nice hearing from you fellas. Now +++++ off until Politico or someone likes them do their jobs. 

We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thelawlorfaithful said:

BWAAAAHAHAHA Brennan and Clapper are the top two names. You guys never learn. Here’s the buried lede.

While the letter’s signatories presented no new evidence, they said their national security experience had made them “deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case” and cited several elements of the story that suggested the Kremlin’s hand at work.

Seemingly most of these people could just ask Biden if it was true, some of them advise his campaign. But here’s the rub...

Top Biden advisers who staffed him during his vice presidency, citing their own recollections as well as a review of Biden’s official schedules, have sharply rejected suggestions that Biden ever met with a representative of Burisma in 2015 or has otherwise been involved in Hunter Biden’s business interests.

Why would you even have to go back and look if the release weren’t true? At least they were smart enough to not put the shady meeting on the official schedule. :hahaha:

A 2014 photo has emerged of Joe Biden (second from right) and his son, Hunter (far right), golfing in the Hamptons with Devon Archer (far left), a Ukrainian gas company executive. Archer served on the board of Burisma Holdings with Hunter

A 2014 photo has emerged of Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, golfing with a Ukraine gas company executive in the Hamptons. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7523253/Photo-reveals-Joe-Hunter-Biden-golfing-Ukraine-gas-company-executive-2014.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...