Jump to content
Nevada Convert

Amy Cohen Barrett Quote on the Supreme Court & Abortion

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, NorCalCoug said:

Getting rid of RvW is nothing more than a boogeyman to the left.  There’s no active push in DC to get rid of it.  It’s not going anywhere.

Apparently, you live in a bubble where RW Pols are not lining up to declare their stance of eliminating Roe.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Rebels18 said:

'They will ban same sex marriages, and even being gay itself"

"They want mandatory prayer in schools, work, and mandatory attendance to mass"

"All foreign religions banned"

"All workers right abolished, become wage slave to corporations"

"All abortion made illegal"

These diatribes are false narratives are not apart of the conservative platform or individual thoughts of any Supreme Court Jurists. It's how they rile up gullible leftists that produce some legendary leftist screaming memes for us on the right.

 

What a nutcase. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, NorCalCoug said:

Apparently you believe in the boogeyman. 

Like I said.

With Trumpistan it's either TDS or denial of the patently obvious 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some politicians will act like they want to overturn RvW because they have constituents that feel that way, but there’s maybe 1 or 2 states where it would even get close to happening. But because of economic boycotts and other leverage, no state is going to overturn it. The issue now is who pays for it. 

  • Like 1
  • Idiot 1
  • Facepalm 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Spaztecs said:

Apparently, you live in a bubble where RW Pols are not lining up to declare their stance of eliminating Roe.

Just look at you. You’re acting like they’re going to ban rock music and dancing. Relax. 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Nevada Convert said:

Just look at you. You’re acting like they’re going to ban rock music and dancing. Relax. 

Hey Convert.   Why don’t you detail the provisions of the common “fetal heartbeat” standard common in many states.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/5591166/state-abortion-laws-explained/%3famp=true

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, sactowndog said:

Hey Convert.   Why don’t you detail the provisions of the common “fetal heartbeat” standard common in many states.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/5591166/state-abortion-laws-explained/%3famp=true

I hate to break it to you, but delivering a baby, then asking the mother if she wants it, or if she would rather her new born baby be put down like a dog. That’s not Pro-Choice, that’s infanticide. Tell me about that heartbeat. 

  • Like 2
  • Idiot 1
  • Facepalm 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Nevada Convert said:

I hate to break it to you, but delivering a baby, then asking the mother if she wants it, or if she would rather her new born baby be put down like a dog. That’s not Pro-Choice, that’s infanticide. Tell me about that heartbeat. 

What are you talking about.  Did you even read the link? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Nevada Convert said:

Just look at you. You’re acting like they’re going to ban rock music and dancing. Relax. 

It's not the dumbest post you've ever made, but you did pull that out of the deepest recesses of your ass.

The topic was overturning Roe v Wade

The new strategy of Trumpistan is to either cry "TDS" or deny the claim. So, I corrected the posters claim and proved it.

Guess I have TDS for disproving the fake news coming from Trumpistan.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, NorCalCoug said:

Apparently you believe in the boogeyman. 

I don't, but you and the rest of Trumpistan sure believe the Lib boogeyman is going to take away their guns and force them to live in a gay Shari'a Socialist State, 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Nevada Convert said:

I hate to break it to you, but delivering a baby, then asking the mother if she wants it, or if she would rather her new born baby be put down like a dog. That’s not Pro-Choice, that’s infanticide. Tell me about that heartbeat. 

In what world are those the only  options ?

If the Pro life forces really, really cared, they would be talking to these women about adoption. They would start organizations to help them finish school, get jobs and healthcare for them and their "innocent" babies. But no, once the little bastard is born, both he and the mother are on their own. 

No Guv or charitable prenatal healthcare, infant care, health insurance, daycare so the mom can work, no counseling services to help these women raise their babies. Just , "phuk em', this is what they get for spreading legs."

These so called, Pro-lifers are so hypocritical, that their sincerity about the sanctity of life is laughable.

  • Like 2
  • Cheers 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...