Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Del Scorcho

sounds like its gaining momentum ...

Recommended Posts

the g5 auto bid is a reward for the #1team.easy first round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

F-ck this. 16 teams- 10 conference champions, 1 independent, 5 at-large. Play begins the weekend after CCGs and continues every weekend until a CG on NYD. Utilize 8 of the existing bowls and rotate the series through them. Other post-conference bowls can continue with non-playoff teams. It really isn't that far out. Two more games than the past four "national champions" and runners-up have played. Cap regular seasons at 12 games with one bye week.

Oh yeah, and play on Sundays...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And if we can't get a 16 team playoff, f-ck this still. 2 G5 bids (hold a G5 playoff to determine) and 1 at-large.

And still play on Sunday...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the G5 are awarded a guaranteed spot, then would it make sense to add a +1 below it where the 2 highest ranking G5 meet?  This would mean more money for the G5 and give more representation to G5 members/conferences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Wyovanian said:

And if we can't get a 16 team playoff, f-ck this still. 2 G5 bids (hold a G5 playoff to determine) and 1 at-large.

And still play on Sunday...

If they only give one G5 bid then have a play in for it among the highest ranked G5’s.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RamSack said:

If the G5 are awarded a guaranteed spot, then would it make sense to add a +1 below it where the 2 highest ranking G5 meet?  This would mean more money for the G5 and give more representation to G5 members/conferences.

No, it doesn’t make sense for a G5 play in spot.  Why beat up each other only to play #1 seed the next week.  
It’ll be the highest rank champ just like it is with the Access spot.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, #1Stunner said:

I think you are right. 

They are not going to throw the G5 a bone. and do this 5 P5 Champs / 1 G5 / 2 At Large deal

 

What if the top ranked G5 school in a given year is ranked 21 in the polls?  The P5 would freak out that the system isn't fair.

Plus, look at the current rankings for this season, and think how mad people would be if they did the 5 P5 Champs / 1 G5 / 2 At Large deal.  It would look like this (is that fair??)

 

1---LSU (SEC)

2---Ohio State (B1G)

3---Clemson (ACC)

4---Oklahoma (BIG 12)

5----Georgia (At Large)

6---Oregon  (PAC12)

7---Baylor (At Large)

8---Wisconsin

9---Florida

10---Penn State

11---Utah

12---Auburn

13---Alabama

14---Michigan

15---Notre Dame

16---Iowa

17---Memphis (G5)

18---Minnesota

19---Boise State

 

 

I honestly dont think people in general would have too much of an issue.  After all, in past couple years one of the P5 conference champs hasnt cracked the Top 8.  In 2018, P12 champ Washington was #9, and in 2017 USC was #12.  And more than once a low-ranked/unranked team has been in position to muck things up with a CCG victory.

  • Cheers 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, #1Stunner said:

I think you are right. 

They are not going to throw the G5 a bone. and do this 5 P5 Champs / 1 G5 / 2 At Large deal

 

What if the top ranked G5 school in a given year is ranked 21 in the polls?  The P5 would freak out that the system isn't fair.

Plus, look at the current rankings for this season, and think how mad people would be if they did the 5 P5 Champs / 1 G5 / 2 At Large deal.  It would look like this (is that fair??)

 

1---LSU (SEC)

2---Ohio State (B1G)

3---Clemson (ACC)

4---Oklahoma (BIG 12)

5----Georgia (At Large)

6---Oregon  (PAC12)

7---Baylor (At Large)

8---Wisconsin

9---Florida

10---Penn State

11---Utah

12---Auburn

13---Alabama

14---Michigan

15---Notre Dame

16---Iowa

17---Memphis (G5)

18---Minnesota

19---Boise State

 

 

At the end of the day, the selection committee is still an opinion poll. What would really matter is how they perform on the field which this is giving them a chance to do. Admittedly, I doubt the G5 rep performs all that well in a playoff, but it's not like a ton of the current playoff games aren't one sided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
 
pBCHVlJX_x96.png
 
Pac-12 commish Larry Scott said he favors all Power 5 conference schools having to play 10 Power 5 opponents. He thinks that could be a negotiation point when/if expands, requiring 10 Power 5 opponents for all Power 5 schools
 
 
 
pBCHVlJX_x96.png
 
Pac-12 commish Larry Scott said “the process has started” behind the scenes regarding discussion among conference commissioners about @CFBPlayoff
expansion to 8-teams. Still unlikely will happen before current deal expires in 2025-26

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PAC12 gets butt hurt over playing a 9 game conference schedule, while the SEC only plays 8 game conference schedule.

PAC12 has only themselves to blame.  The California schools force their 9 game conference schedule policy.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, #1Stunner said:

PAC12 gets butt hurt over playing a 9 game conference schedule, while the SEC only plays 8 game conference schedule.

PAC12 has only themselves to blame.  The California schools force their 9 game conference schedule policy.  

Bet the Big 10 and Big 12 are ok with the idea as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, #1Stunner said:

A team like Boise could be ranked 6th in the polls, and would be seeded 8th.

Don't expect fairness.  

Also, doesn't seem fair that the Big12 only has 10 schools, and yet they'd get an autobid, while other P5 conferences have 12 and 14 schools competing for an autobid.

The other power conferences won’t allow that.  There will either be schools getting kicked out of p5, reshuffled to other conferences, or expansion.  Big 10 already has stated issue with BigXII on that front. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Did I hear a WOOSH? said:

The other power conferences won’t allow that.  There will either be schools getting kicked out of p5, reshuffled to other conferences, or expansion.  Big 10 already has stated issue with BigXII on that front. 

My money is on UCF getting reshuffled to CUSA. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RSF said:

Bet the Big 10 and Big 12 are ok with the idea as well.

Good luck forcing the SEC.  They seem to be dominating college football and have the most fans.   Doubt they'll agree to anything.

They'll just continue to count BYU and Army as P5 games.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Did I hear a WOOSH? said:

The other power conferences won’t allow that.  There will either be schools getting kicked out of p5, reshuffled to other conferences, or expansion.  Big 10 already has stated issue with BigXII on that front. 

Disagree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, #1Stunner said:

Good luck forcing the SEC.  They seem to be dominating college football and have the most fans.   Doubt they'll agree to anything.

They'll just continue to count BYU and Army as P5 games.

And everyone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MWC Tex said:

And everyone else.

It's not like they play the defacto P5 teams anyway.  At least the upper level SEC teams don't.  They aren't alone, the BIG10 counts the top 4 programs in the AAC as P5 teams and there's still little cooperation there.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Did I hear a WOOSH? said:

A fool and their money are soon departed!

giphy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×