Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

mugtang

Poll: If the election were held today

2020 Election  

45 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you vote for right now?

    • Democratic Nominee
      16
    • Trump
      16
    • 3rd Party
      11
    • Not going to vote
      2


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, sactowndog said:

I think your poll might be representative of the male vote.  I am not certain how moderate this board is.  Most moderate Republicans spoke out strongly against Trump's separation policy and more than one left the party.  On this board, most Republican Party leaning groups defend it.   Hard to call that moderate.  More like Alabama.

It’s true that there were a few here that supported that policy but I don’t think it’s fair to say most of the republican leaning people here supported that policy.  But I could be misremembering. 

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mugtang said:

It’s true that there were a few here that supported that policy but I don’t think it’s fair to say most of the republican leaning people here supported that policy.  But I could be misremembering. 

I don't see many condemning it here in this thread.  More mostly making bogus analogies to kids whose parents have committed felonies and gone to jail as justification for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, sactowndog said:

You including me in that Joe?   As a person who is appalled by Trumps border seperation policy.  Is that acting like a toddler?

My hunch no, he is referring to Orange.  Orange is the best entertainment since Hugh Jiddup. 

Mug - is Hugh in pergatory or eternal damnation?  

110926run_defense710.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sactowndog said:

I don't see many condemning it here in this thread.  More mostly making bogus analogies to kids whose parents have committed felonies and gone to jail as justification for it. 

You had one person in Nevada Convert who compared it to that.  That’s not exactly “most”.  

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mugtang said:

You had one person in Nevada Convert who compared it to that.  That’s not exactly “most”.  

Convert, pokebball, Soupslam, Modesto and one or two others.  I have Blues blocked but I’d guess you could add him too.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sactowndog said:

Convert, pokebball, Soupslam, Modesto and one or two others.  I have Blues blocked but I’d guess you could add him too.   

 

I only went back to page 9 when you posted the on father’s day quote and looked forward from there.  I didn’t realize it had been discussed before that. 

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mugtang said:

I only went back to page 9 when you posted the on father’s day quote and looked forward from there.  I didn’t realize it had been discussed before that. 

Yep.  Hard to characterize that as moderate.    And I’m not a everything Trump has done is horrible person.   Hell, at first I was one of the few Trump supporters in the early primary season before concluding he was too unstable to be President.  

I voted libertarian last election but not again.  A policy of separating children from parents is inexcusable and will go down among the worst moments in US history.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sactowndog said:

Yep.  Hard to characterize that as moderate.    And I’m not a everything Trump has done is horrible person.   Hell, at first I was one of the few Trump supporters in the early primary season before concluding he was too unstable to be President.  

I voted libertarian last election but not again.  A policy of separating children from parents is inexcusable and will go down among the worst moments in US history.   

Right I understand that position.  But I’m talking the overall position of the board, not on a single issue.  But I can also see why that would influence your views on the overall position of the board.  

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Orange said:

No "moderates" anywhere actually support Trump.  And you know damned well there are zero "Jill Stein" voters in that 3rd party batch.

Again you are showing you do not understand this board.  11 voted third party,  i know for a fact if that option was removed several as in 3 to 4 would choose the democratic nominee, 2 or 3 would choose Trump and the rest would choose not to vote.   I am sure you do not believe me because you do not know us. Take away third party and Trump/Drmocrat becomes a 50/50 split.   People like myself, Top25, Retro, Blues will NEVER vote for Trump but I garuntee we all chose third party. Retro and I would choose the D candidate, the others would abstain. 

This is a balanced board, you thinking otherwise says a lot about you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

Again you are showing you do not understand this board.  11 voted third party,  i know for a fact if that option was removed several as in 3 to 4 would choose the democratic nominee, 2 or 3 would choose Trump and the rest would choose not to vote.   I am sure you do not believe me because you do not know us. Take away third party and Trump/Drmocrat becomes a 50/50 split.   People like myself, Top25, Retro, Blues will NEVER vote for Trump but I garuntee we all chose third party. Retro and I would choose the D candidate, the others would abstain. 

This is a balanced board, you thinking otherwise says a lot about you.

I’m guessing Retro voted D.   I think he and I share an absolute disdain for Trump.     Blues hates Trump but hates Dems more so I expect he would vote Trump.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sactowndog said:

I’m guessing Retro voted D.   I think he and I share an absolute disdain for Trump.     Blues hates Trump but hates Dems more so I expect he would vote Trump.  

Not a chance Blues would vote for Trump if third party was taken away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, halfmanhalfbronco said:

Not a chance Blues would vote for Trump if third party was taken away. 

Ask him.  I have him blocked.  I expect even with the third party option he votes Trump.  Blues hate for Dems exceeds his disdain for Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sactowndog said:

Ask him.  I have him blocked.  I expect even with the third party option he votes Trump.  Blues hate for Dems exceeds his disdain for Trump.

Wrong, I consider him a friend. He hates authoritarianism. He hates typical Republican voter blocks like ranchers and farmers.  He would vote for whoever wants less government and less welfare, including welfare for those mentioned above.  No chance in hell he would vote for Trump.  No chance he would vote for most Dems either.  He would certainly choose a few Dems before trump though. 

@bluerules009 let me know if I am off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

Wrong, I consider him a friend. He hates authoritarianism. He hates typical Republican voter blocks like ranchers and farmers.  He would vote for whoever wants less government and less welfare, including welfare for those mentioned above.  No chance in hell he would vote for Trump.  No chance he would vote for most Dems either.  He would certainly choose a few Dems before trump though. 

@bluerules009 let me know if I am off. 

Right but few Dems won’t be nominated.  I’m not a Dem because their economic policies don’t make much sense to me.   For Blues, I can’t imagine him ever voting for the likely Dem nominee over Trump.  But I am happy to be proven wrong.  His workers are leeches philosophy doesn’t fit the Dem mold at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sactowndog said:

Right but few Dems won’t be nominated.  I’m not a Dem because their economic policies don’t make much sense to me.   For Blues, I can’t imagine him ever voting for the likely Dem nominee over Trump.  But I am happy to be proven wrong.  His workers are leeches philosophy doesn’t fit the Dem mold at all. 

Im not saying he would vote for the like dem nominee over Trump, just that he would not vote for Trump.  Abstain or third party. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sactowndog said:

You including me in that Joe?   As a person who is appalled by Trumps border seperation policy.  Is that acting like a toddler?

No. That was in reference to Orange's personality on this board. You don't act like @Orange. By "his ilk", I meant the irrational and hysterically screaming SJW crowd.  

So no. I wasn't talking about you. I thought it was obvious I was talking about the unhinged socialist wing of the Democrat party, not just people who are critical of the administration and it's policies. There's nothing wrong with that. Thinking Trump is an asshole for something doesn't automatically put you in the OrangeCrowd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

Wrong, I consider him a friend. He hates authoritarianism. He hates typical Republican voter blocks like ranchers and farmers.  He would vote for whoever wants less government and less welfare, including welfare for those mentioned above.  No chance in hell he would vote for Trump.  No chance he would vote for most Dems either.  He would certainly choose a few Dems before trump though. 

@bluerules009 let me know if I am off. 

You are right.

1 hour ago, sactowndog said:

Right but few Dems won’t be nominated.  I’m not a Dem because their economic policies don’t make much sense to me.   For Blues, I can’t imagine him ever voting for the likely Dem nominee over Trump.  But I am happy to be proven wrong.  His workers are leeches philosophy doesn’t fit the Dem mold at all. 

 

I would vote for Tulsi Gabbard over anyone in the race right now.   I might vote for Biden although I don't think he will get the nomination.  Yang interests me he has some positions that are very thought out and i like them, although he has positions i hate so much that would be a hard vote.

I would never vote for Sanders, Trump, Hillary Clinton, Warren, Kasich, Harris, Booker, O'Rourke or Castro they are all morally repugnant individuals who should not be given responsibility for a dog pound let alone people.

Otherwise I will vote 3rd party.  A pothead is better than most of the morons in the major parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

Again you are showing you do not understand this board.  11 voted third party,  i know for a fact if that option was removed several as in 3 to 4 would choose the democratic nominee, 2 or 3 would choose Trump and the rest would choose not to vote.   I am sure you do not believe me because you do not know us. Take away third party and Trump/Drmocrat becomes a 50/50 split.   People like myself, Top25, Retro, Blues will NEVER vote for Trump but I garuntee we all chose third party. Retro and I would choose the D candidate, the others would abstain. 

This is a balanced board, you thinking otherwise says a lot about you.

It's absolutely not a balanced board, because there are zero women here.  Everyone knows FAR more man than women support Trump.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bluerules009 said:

You are right.

 

I would vote for Tulsi Gabbard over anyone in the race right now.   I might vote for Biden although I don't think he will get the nomination.  Yang interests me he has some positions that are very thought out and i like them, although he has positions i hate so much that would be a hard vote.

I would never vote for Sanders, Trump, Hillary Clinton, Warren, Kasich, Harris, Booker, O'Rourke or Castro they are all morally repugnant individuals who should not be given responsibility for a dog pound let alone people.

Otherwise I will vote 3rd party.  A pothead is better than most of the morons in the major parties.

Why are you so obsessed with Clinton?  She isn't running.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bluerules009 said:

You are right.

 

I would vote for Tulsi Gabbard over anyone in the race right now.   I might vote for Biden although I don't think he will get the nomination.  Yang interests me he has some positions that are very thought out and i like them, although he has positions i hate so much that would be a hard vote.

I would never vote for Sanders, Trump, Hillary Clinton, Warren, Kasich, Harris, Booker, O'Rourke or Castro they are all morally repugnant individuals who should not be given responsibility for a dog pound let alone people.

Otherwise I will vote 3rd party.  A pothead is better than most of the morons in the major parties.

Took you off ignore.   Well I agree about Clinton and did vote third party,   The rest hard to make the claim for me they are more morally repugnant than Trump.  I would not want my voting to contribute to that man going back to office.   That being said my vote in CA won’t really matter.  The only place I can impact stopping Trump is voting against him in the primary.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...