Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Nevada Convert

China’s Huge Advantage In a Naval Battle With the US.

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, NorCalCoug said:

Nuclear war, just like the ones Trump started with North Korea and Russia!!!

tenor.gif?itemid=7642189

I love leftist fear mongering...  :rolleyes:

A trade war forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbor.

Trade was an issue that caused WWI as well.

 

Just saying, history does tend to repeat itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, smltwnrckr said:

The idea that trade wars lead to shooting wars is a truism that existed long before triggered memes and has never been a 'leftist' one.

Dude, wars have been started over someone throwing a rock at the wrong person, a persons honor being insulted, etc. 

Wars involving the US don’t start over tariffs, you dope. 

kat.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nevada Convert said:

Dude, wars have been started over someone throwing a rock at the wrong person, a persons honor being insulted, etc. 

Wars involving the US don’t start over tariffs, you dope. 

So you are saying the US didn't fight in WW! or WWII?

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, bluerules009 said:

A trade war forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbor.

Trade was an issue that caused WWI as well.

 

Just saying, history does tend to repeat itself.

This is rich. You spent so much of your time blabbing about us using weapons from WWII (which we don’t), and now you’re giving us a history lesson that the WWII era world economy and WWII era tariffs are comparable with today and we better watch out because we could star a world war. 

A trade war didn’t cause Japan to strike PH you mega dummy. There were several reasons. They wanted to expand their territory in the Pacific to have access to national resources like Oil, rubber, etc. They were never going to be able to trade and acquire all the resources they wanted even with advantageous trading. Japanese imperialism to be a bigger player in the world sums up most of it. Moving the Pacific fleet from CA to Hawaii in 1939 sent a message to Japan that we also had interest in some of those resources, but not making them a part of the US. The Japs felt that war was inevitable and it might as well get it started using surprise. 

You should write a book about how you see history, and it’ll be even more inaccurate than the history books they make kids learn from in Muslim countries, China, Russia and other US hating countries. 

 

kat.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, bluerules009 said:

So you are saying the US didn't fight in WW! or WWII?

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

No, I’m saying you don’t know anything about war, particular wars that have occurred, the US military, a military in general or anything related to that. You are a tragic example of a supposed ‘thinking’ adult. Your bat shit crazy analysis is more like insanely inspired propaganda than anything else. 

kat.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Nevada Convert said:

This is rich. You spent so much of your time blabbing about us using weapons from WWII (which we don’t), and now you’re giving us a history lesson that the WWII era world economy and WWII era tariffs are comparable with today and we better watch out because we could star a world war. 

A trade war didn’t cause Japan to strike PH you mega dummy. There were several reasons. They wanted to expand their territory in the Pacific to have access to national resources like Oil, rubber, etc. They were never going to be able to trade and acquire all the resources they wanted even with advantageous trading. Japanese imperialism to be a bigger player in the world sums up most of it. Moving the Pacific fleet from CA to Hawaii in 1939 sent a message to Japan that we also had interest in some of those resources, but not making them a part of the US. The Japs felt that war was inevitable and it might as well get it started using surprise. 

You should write a book about how you see history, and it’ll be even more inaccurate than the history books they make kids learn from in Muslim countries, China, Russia and other US hating countries. 

 

I don't have to write books about history they already exist, you should read one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bluerules009 said:

I don't have to write books about history they already exist, you should read one.

I’m really waiting for your new book, as the comedy scene out there has been a bit weak. Here’s the title and publisher info. if anyone is interested. 

“Military History All You Idiots Should Already Know” by BlewMules. 1st print: Code Pink Publishers.

At the book stores I’d look for it in the Comedy section first, then maybe the Fiction section, then maybe the War section under Military Propaganda, then try the Psychology section under Mothers That Never Hugged Their Kids: Catastrophic Results, or maybe the Environmental section under Examples of Wasted Paper, or maybe the Travel section under Cities - Shit Cities  - Fallon - Shit Fallon Has Produced, or you might as well just forget it. 

kat.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...