Jump to content
mugtang

#1 Nevada vs #4 SDSU

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TheSanDiegan said:

The quad system existed with RPI as well. They simply cut and paste the parsing into the new NET metric.

This is only the second year of the quad system, right? Maybe third. Prior to quadrants win were categorized by top 50, 50-100, etc. regardless of location. I think the quadrant system is aN improvement in that regard. I also think the NET has been a big step forward from the RPI. Though, I wonder why the NCAA had to create their own metric when they could have just combined the ratings of KenPom, BPI, Sagarin, and others into one number. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, blind_squirrel54 said:

This is only the second year of the quad system, right? Maybe third. Prior to quadrants win were categorized by top 50, 50-100, etc. regardless of location. I think the quadrant system is aN improvement in that regard. I also think the NET has been a big step forward from the RPI. Though, I wonder why the NCAA had to create their own metric when they could have just combined the ratings of KenPom, BPI, Sagarin, and others into one number. 

Ken Pom has said a few times he didn't want his ratings factored into the new NCAA NET system because it was more predictive and wouldn't provide NCAA committee with the information they wanted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×