Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
bluerules009

Clinton emails

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, pokebball said:

Trump and the Clintons have been friends for a very long time.  They probably have a lot of dirt on each other.

Well, I am okay with blaming Trump for Clinton's emails.  Effin Trump always covering up for his various swamp creature friends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Akkula said:

Well, I am okay with blaming Trump for Clinton's emails.  Effin Trump always covering up for his various swamp creature friends.

and the fbi; and the justice dept....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, pokebball said:

and the fbi; and the justice dept....

It is too bad, Trump really failed you guys by not getting to the bottom of things since he controls the entire government.  Too much golf and twitter, I suppose.  If he would have only opened an investigation we would all know THE TRUTHHHHHHHHHH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Akkula said:

It is too bad, Trump really failed you guys by not getting to the bottom of things since he controls the entire government.  Too much golf and twitter, I suppose.  If he would have only opened an investigation we would all know THE TRUTHHHHHHHHHH

...and Obama

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, sean327 said:

Don't need a special council or the circus it would bring. FBI already has all the evidence needed to prosecute, convict, and throw her fat ass in prison.

Well then, why hasn't the Trump DOJ done anything with all this evidence that the FBI has collected?

It's not up to the FBI to "prosecute".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In defense of the Obama administration, they really wanted Hillary to win. And they really really super really wanted Trump to lose

#OrangeManBad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, pokebball said:

...and MichelleBabyDaddy@gmail.com

Fixed that to illustrate why email thing will never prosecuted

#LiarInChief

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, sean327 said:

Who’s talking about uranium? It’s a proven fact she willfully mishandled classified information. 

I don't think it is. Most of the emails were classified after the fact. And none of the emails were properly marked as classified.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, bluerules009 said:

 

Which also leads us to believe Comey lied when he said he made the decision.  Not surprising given his history.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-anti-trump-former-fbi-lovers-strzok-page-sound-like-abbott-costello-in-testimony

But this is where Page, unlike her paramour, provided new and damning information when she testified that “every person on the team knew no charges would be brought” against Clinton. How did they know? Here’s the key questioning by Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, a former federal prosecutor:

Ratcliffe: You’re making it sound like it was the Department (of Justice) that told you you’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to --

Page:  That’s correct.

Ratcliffe: -- bring a case based on that.

So, there it is. Obama’s Justice Department ordered the FBI not to pursue a charge against Clinton for her mishandling of classified emails when she was secretary of state under the most likely legal avenue – the “gross negligence” provision of the Espionage Act.

An Faux opinion piece based on a selectively leaked portion of the transcript.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

An Faux opinion piece based on a selectively leaked portion of the transcript.

You highlighted testimony, not opinion.  Is testimony not important?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Akkula said:

Then I call on President Trump to immediately declassify and release the covered up evidence to the public immediately!

It has already been released moron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jackmormon said:

An Faux opinion piece based on a selectively leaked portion of the transcript.

The whole transcript was leaked moron.

There is no other way to interpret that anyway unless you are a biased hypocrite spinning DNC propaganda.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-reached-agreement-with-clinton-lawyers-to-block-fbi-access-to-clinton-foundation-emails-strzok-says.amp#click=https://t.co/m4Y8GyOhzk

 

The richest part to me is Strzok's testimony that he didn't think they could get a search warrant. This is the man and organization that used the pee pee dossier to spy on the Trump campaign!!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, IanforHeisman said:

You probably believe she sold uranium to Russia as well. 

 

 

Do you juke with Jack?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, renoskier said:

Well then, why hasn't the Trump DOJ done anything with all this evidence that the FBI has collected?

It's not up to the FBI to "prosecute".

@jackmormon can you give reno a hand on this one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, renoskier said:

Well then, why hasn't the Trump DOJ done anything with all this evidence that the FBI has collected?

It's not up to the FBI to "prosecute".

It is the practice of one administration to not prosecute the prior administration.  This has been normal practice for 200+ years.   Bush officials were not prosecuted by Obama and Obama won't be prosecuted by Trump just like Trump expects to not be prosecuted by whomever succeeds him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, IanforHeisman said:

Deleting emails is a regular Tuesday for Trump. 

I am passed caring about Hillary Clinton, but his is rich.  Calling Lois Lerner, calling Lois Lerner...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, modestobulldog said:

You highlighted testimony, not opinion.  Is testimony not important?

Selectively leaked portion of the testimony.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, bluerules009 said:

The whole transcript was leaked moron.

There is no other way to interpret that anyway unless you are a biased hypocrite spinning DNC propaganda.

Then why link an opinion piece by Craig Jarrett of all people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, bluerules009 said:

It is the practice of one administration to not prosecute the prior administration.  This has been normal practice for 200+ years.   Bush officials were not prosecuted by Obama and Obama won't be prosecuted by Trump just like Trump expects to not be prosecuted by whomever succeeds him.

Then why did Trump pressure Sessions to open an investigation into the Clinton Foundation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×