Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

bluerules009

Clinton emails

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, pokebball said:

Trump and the Clintons have been friends for a very long time.  They probably have a lot of dirt on each other.

Well, I am okay with blaming Trump for Clinton's emails.  Effin Trump always covering up for his various swamp creature friends.

Posted Image
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, pokebball said:

and the fbi; and the justice dept....

It is too bad, Trump really failed you guys by not getting to the bottom of things since he controls the entire government.  Too much golf and twitter, I suppose.  If he would have only opened an investigation we would all know THE TRUTHHHHHHHHHH

Posted Image
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Akkula said:

It is too bad, Trump really failed you guys by not getting to the bottom of things since he controls the entire government.  Too much golf and twitter, I suppose.  If he would have only opened an investigation we would all know THE TRUTHHHHHHHHHH

...and Obama

The World Needs More Cowboys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sean327 said:

Don't need a special council or the circus it would bring. FBI already has all the evidence needed to prosecute, convict, and throw her fat ass in prison.

Well then, why hasn't the Trump DOJ done anything with all this evidence that the FBI has collected?

It's not up to the FBI to "prosecute".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, sean327 said:

Who’s talking about uranium? It’s a proven fact she willfully mishandled classified information. 

I don't think it is. Most of the emails were classified after the fact. And none of the emails were properly marked as classified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, bluerules009 said:

 

Which also leads us to believe Comey lied when he said he made the decision.  Not surprising given his history.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-anti-trump-former-fbi-lovers-strzok-page-sound-like-abbott-costello-in-testimony

But this is where Page, unlike her paramour, provided new and damning information when she testified that “every person on the team knew no charges would be brought” against Clinton. How did they know? Here’s the key questioning by Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, a former federal prosecutor:

Ratcliffe: You’re making it sound like it was the Department (of Justice) that told you you’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to --

Page:  That’s correct.

Ratcliffe: -- bring a case based on that.

So, there it is. Obama’s Justice Department ordered the FBI not to pursue a charge against Clinton for her mishandling of classified emails when she was secretary of state under the most likely legal avenue – the “gross negligence” provision of the Espionage Act.

An Faux opinion piece based on a selectively leaked portion of the transcript.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

An Faux opinion piece based on a selectively leaked portion of the transcript.

You highlighted testimony, not opinion.  Is testimony not important?

110926run_defense710.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-reached-agreement-with-clinton-lawyers-to-block-fbi-access-to-clinton-foundation-emails-strzok-says.amp#click=https://t.co/m4Y8GyOhzk

 

The richest part to me is Strzok's testimony that he didn't think they could get a search warrant. This is the man and organization that used the pee pee dossier to spy on the Trump campaign!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, renoskier said:

Well then, why hasn't the Trump DOJ done anything with all this evidence that the FBI has collected?

It's not up to the FBI to "prosecute".

It is the practice of one administration to not prosecute the prior administration.  This has been normal practice for 200+ years.   Bush officials were not prosecuted by Obama and Obama won't be prosecuted by Trump just like Trump expects to not be prosecuted by whomever succeeds him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bluerules009 said:

The whole transcript was leaked moron.

There is no other way to interpret that anyway unless you are a biased hypocrite spinning DNC propaganda.

Then why link an opinion piece by Craig Jarrett of all people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bluerules009 said:

It is the practice of one administration to not prosecute the prior administration.  This has been normal practice for 200+ years.   Bush officials were not prosecuted by Obama and Obama won't be prosecuted by Trump just like Trump expects to not be prosecuted by whomever succeeds him.

Then why did Trump pressure Sessions to open an investigation into the Clinton Foundation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...