Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

mugtang

Mueller Report Out Next Week?

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

The timing seems odd if this report bears out. He just arrested Roger Stone and still have a lot of evidence to sift though it seems like there are still a lot of loose ends to tie up. 

 

Anyone who thinks someone as undisciplined as Trump could successfully run a coverup is dumber than Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, bluerules009 said:

 

Anyone who thinks someone as undisciplined as Trump could successfully run a coverup is dumber than Trump.

These are the same people that think Russia’s meddling had a material impact on the election too...  don’t underestimate the stupidity.

v0icAvfW.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mueller’s report will say nothing regarding Trump. Unlike Comey, he will follow Justice Department policy and make no statements regarding a person under investigation that did not result in indictment. Also, this was done weeks ago and he was only waiting for Barr to be confirmed due to Whittaker’s questionable status as acting AG. Mueller already said his piece with his indictments. Everything interesting about the investigation into Russia’s that we don’t already know will remain classified as is usual in counterintelligence investigations.

My prediction. Either way, it’s gonna be a lot news/twitter/mwcboard day.

giphy.gif

We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, soupslam1 said:

They should have a separate committee of Congress (4 Republicans and 4 Democrats) that does nothing but investigations into each party and the president, so that the rest of congress can concentrate on the business of running the country. 

Wouldn't work, the other congressman and senators would not allow a committee like that where they couldn't grandstand for the press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, bluerules009 said:

Wouldn't work, the other congressman and senators would not allow a committee like that where they couldn't grandstand for the press.

I said that tongue in cheek, because it seems like all you hear coming out of Congress are investigations. Let eight of them chase their tails and make the rest actually get some work done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, NorCalCoug said:

These are the same people that think Russia’s meddling had a material impact on the election too...  don’t underestimate the stupidity.

We have finally reached the point where the line is...

There was collusion, but there is no proof it affected the outcome of the election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

We have finally reached the point where the line is...

There was collusion, but there is no proof it affected the outcome of the election.

There was collusion to build a hotel.  Which isn't a crime.

The only crime was Hillary paying Russians to help her campaign get dirt on trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bluerules009 said:

There was collusion to build a hotel.  Which isn't a crime.

The only crime was Hillary paying Russians to help her campaign get dirt on trump.

You can’t help yourself from bring up Obama or Hillary. Hillary didn’t pay the Russians anything.

its against the law to offer a foreign official a bribe. And if everything was very legal and very cool, why has he been lying about it for the past three years. Why have all of Trump’s folks been lying about all of the Russian contacts, even though the know it will land them in prison?

There are three components to a contract. An offer, acceptance, and consideration.

The offer: Russia, if your listening...

Acceptance: Russian military intelligence began hacking Podesta’s emails within 24 hours.

Consideration. If only someone could figure that out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

You can’t help yourself from bring up Obama or Hillary. Hillary didn’t pay the Russians anything.

its against the law to offer a foreign official a bribe. And if everything was very legal and very cool, why has he been lying about it for the past three years. Why have all of Trump’s folks been lying about all of the Russian contacts, even though the know it will land them in prison?

There are three components to a contract. An offer, acceptance, and consideration.

The offer: Russia, if your listening...

Acceptance: Russian military intelligence began hacking Podesta’s emails within 24 hours.

Consideration. If only someone could figure that out...

You can't help yourself claiming Hillary/Obama/DNC or anyone on your side of the fence, didn't commit a crime and claiming the same action by Trump was a crime.

It fully discredits everything you claim.   Not to mention your tendency to lie all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jackmormon said:

We have finally reached the point where the line is...

There was collusion, but there is no proof it affected the outcome of the election.

What! As far as I’m aware collusion has not been proven. Are you now an insider on Muellers investigation? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jackmormon said:

You can’t help yourself from bring up Obama or Hillary. Hillary didn’t pay the Russians anything.

its against the law to offer a foreign official a bribe. And if everything was very legal and very cool, why has he been lying about it for the past three years. Why have all of Trump’s folks been lying about all of the Russian contacts, even though the know it will land them in prison?

There are three components to a contract. An offer, acceptance, and consideration.

The offer: Russia, if your listening...

Acceptance: Russian military intelligence began hacking Podesta’s emails within 24 hours.

Consideration. If only someone could figure that out...

Correct, Hillary didn’t pay the Russians.

she paid a former British intelligence agent to make up shit about the Russians and Trump.  And failed to report that expenditure to the FEC.

Look, Trumps a bad guy.  Dirty as sin.  FFS, look at the people he surrounded himself with.  The irony, is that he the Clintons were exactly the same way.  Oh, and by the way, the clintons and trump were friends until they ran for president against each other.

i honestly don’t understand how someone could be as partisan as you are on a message board.  You are just like Hannity, except Hannity is getting paid to be a partisan shill.  You aren’t a nut, or even whacko left, but you are the single most partisan democrat I’ve ever come across.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/20/2019 at 3:54 PM, Artist formerly known as Hal said:

stormy daniels is the only one that can bring trump down 

I disagree. If there is a Russian pee pee tape and it's released, that would do the trick. Make that trickle.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CPslograd said:

Correct, Hillary didn’t pay the Russians.

she paid a former British intelligence agent to make up shit about the Russians and Trump.  And failed to report that expenditure to the FEC.

Look, Trumps a bad guy.  Dirty as sin.  FFS, look at the people he surrounded himself with.  The irony, is that he the Clintons were exactly the same way.  Oh, and by the way, the clintons and trump were friends until they ran for president against each other.

i honestly don’t understand how someone could be as partisan as you are on a message board.  You are just like Hannity, except Hannity is getting paid to be a partisan shill.  You aren’t a nut, or even whacko left, but you are the single most partisan democrat I’ve ever come across.

No. Her campaign and the DNC used Perkins Coie to hire Fusion GPS to continue the oppo research on Trump that was initially funded by the owners of the Washington Free Beacon. As part of their research into Trump, Fusion GPS hired a firm owned by two former MI-6 agents, one of whom specialized in Russia for 20+ years to look into Trump's personal and professional dealings with Russia. 

There's a pretty significant difference between what actually happened and the varied conspiracy theories that get peddled around about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, retrofade said:

No. Her campaign and the DNC used Perkins Coie to hire Fusion GPS to continue the oppo research on Trump that was initially funded by the owners of the Washington Free Beacon. As part of their research into Trump, Fusion GPS hired a firm owned by two former MI-6 agents, one of whom specialized in Russia for 20+ years to look into Trump's personal and professional dealings with Russia. 

There's a pretty significant difference between what actually happened and the varied conspiracy theories that get peddled around about it. 

Clinton paid Russians for information through an intermediary Fusion GPS.  We all know this for sure.    Her husband also recieved bribes I mean speaking fees of $750K and she approved some paperwork in her job that helped Russians aquire a uranium mine in this country.   Not to mention the Russians were probably reading her classified e0mails.

Trump is accused of colluding with Russians for information for some unknown reward with the cooperation of Wikileaks for some unknown reason.

Why is one a crime in your mind and the other isn't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...