Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

mugtang

Here’s an impeachable offense

Recommended Posts

Why would Mueller respond to this item specifically after being so quiet for so long?  There have been tons of reports and articles before this. They have never talked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, toonkee said:

Why would Mueller respond to this item specifically after being so quiet for so long?  There have been tons of reports and articles before this. They have never talked.

I think it's because they directly attributed things to the SCO. The Buzzfeed News editor-in-chief and reporters have tried to get clarification from Peter Carr, and they won't tell them what they have incorrect. They also seem to be confused as to why he didn't correct them when they asked for comment yesterday. This whole thing is weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, toonkee said:

Why would Mueller respond to this item specifically after being so quiet for so long?  There have been tons of reports and articles before this. They have never talked.

Maybe because the NY Times paid him for exclusive rights to leaked info.

       

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, retrofade said:

Here's something that I find hilarious.

People like @SDSUfan, @Rebels18, @easybronc, @pokerider, etc., all attack Mueller as being corrupt, untrustworthy, and other similar things. Now that his office is pushing back on a pretty damning report, he's suddenly their hero. :lol:

 

I never said anything about the Special Counsel investigation team. Even though the basis for the investigation was bullsh*t (Steele dossier and FISA Court), and the fact that this investigation has been going on for nearly 2 years (and like $60 million) without any substantial evidence is pretty ridiculous. Many think the Mueller Report is going to be pretty disappointing when they eventually do give up on the Trump/Russia hoax. 

No one is singing their praise because they won't back the report. Unlike you who ignorantly instantly believes anything anti- trump...we can connect the dots and assume Mueller isn't backing it because "Pee pee Tapes Buzzfeed" once again didn't produce any reliable sources/evidence to substantiate their claims. I think it's very damning that even Mueller doesn't want to embarrass himself further by associating themselves with this BOMBSHELL/SMOKING GUN TO IMPEACH TRUMP" report that was debunked in less than 24 hours and was nothing but opinion and speculation which was misleadingly presented as fact by the MSM because...fake news. 

Rebel18_zps27699187.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, toonkee said:

Why would Mueller respond to this item specifically after being so quiet for so long?  There have been tons of reports and articles before this. They have never talked.

One possibility is that the SCO was upset that Cohen disclosed things that he should not have.  

Don't forget, this is a highly complex case.  Comments on what may or may not have occurred are consequently highly nuanced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sandiegopete said:

One possibility is that the SCO was upset that Cohen disclosed things that he should not have.  

Don't forget, this is a highly complex case.  Comments on what may or may not have occurred are consequently highly nuanced. 

Cohen wasn't the source for the article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, sandiegopete said:

One possibility is that the SCO was upset that Cohen disclosed things that he should not have.  

Don't forget, this is a highly complex case.  Comments on what may or may not have occurred are consequently highly nuanced. 

Cohen wasn’t a source for the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, retrofade said:

Dude... you regularly defend pretty much everything that Trump does. Hell, even in this thread you're trying to say that the reporting doesn't matter because it's coming from Cohen. The problem is that it isn't... it's coming from two federal law enforcement officials.

Well shyt

The World Needs More Cowboys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, retrofade said:

No, that's not what happened. The SCO is disputing some aspects of the report, but not specifically identifying anything. Reading comprehension appears to be difficult for Trumpists.

Fap fap fap ......

Wake up,little Willie

Haha

Clown

1 hour ago, youngrebelfan40 said:

Good to know of your faith in the Special Counsel's Office. I'm sure you will accept their findings!

Ooh got me there!

Hard to match wits with you!

“Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”

-Richard Feynman

"When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators."

-P.J. O’Rourke

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...