Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
pokebball

Kellyanne takes Acosta to the woodshed

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, IanforHeisman said:

I guess we have different definitions of taking someone to the woodshed.. 

You and I can probably make a list of this forums members and where they stand on this.  I had you pegged correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven’t watched the video but my issue with Acosta is he makes the story about him instead of reporting on the story.  On the flip side he is a good counterbalance to Trump’s aggresiveness towards the media as Acosta is combative right back.  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kellyanne is a soulless swamp witch whose heart is blacker than burnt toast but Acosta asked her the equivalent of "when are you going to stop beating your wife" and deserved whatever came back.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, mugtang said:

I haven’t watched the video but my issue with Acosta is he makes the story about him instead of reporting on the story.  On the flip side he is a good counterbalance to Trump’s aggresiveness towards the media as Acosta is combative right back.  

Pretty much my take.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, mugtang said:

I haven’t watched the video but my issue with Acosta is he makes the story about him instead of reporting on the story.  On the flip side he is a good counterbalance to Trump’s aggresiveness towards the media as Acosta is combative right back.  

Yeah but let's analyze this particular event.

Many of the questions Acosta has put to Huckabee-(Don't Call Me Bernie)Sanders have been totally appropriate yet she has refused to give a straight answer. Not so here.

One, it's not Sarah involved now, it's somebody else who hasn't run roughshod over Acosta in that manner. Two, his question was what in a court of law would be categorized as "argumentative" and appropriately objected to. That is to say, it was not designed to elicit information but simply to embarrass the "witness." So in this particular instance, her dressing him down was absolutely appropriate.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SleepingGiantsFan said:

Yeah but let's analyze this particular event.

Many of the questions Acosta has put to Huckabee-(Don't Call Me Bernie)Sanders have been totally appropriate yet she has refused to give a straight answer. That is not so here.

One, it's not Sarah involved now, it's somebody else who hasn't run roughshod over Acosta in that manner. Two, this question was what in a court of law would be categorized as "argumentative" and appropriately objected to. That is to say, it was not designed to elicit information but simply to embarrass the "witness." So in this particular instance, her dressing him down was absolutely appropriate.

Well crap. Now I’m going to have to watch it. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After watching it, yes she was right to dress Acosta down like she did.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Acosta is a turd. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

She said "alternative information & additional facts."  That's dangerously close to my favorite quote of her's of all time:  "alternative facts."

W/all the lies that come out of her & the WH she deserves that & more.  She basically told him, you have no friends.  A very mature responce.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, easybronc said:

KellyAnne for white house press secretary!  

Alternative facts!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×