Jump to content
mugtang

Stormy Daniel’s defamation suit tossed by judge

Recommended Posts

And she has to pay Trump’s legal fees :rotflmfao:

 

  • Haha 2

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, retrofade said:

It should be noted that this was just for the defamation suit. There are two others that a part of this. The defamation claim always seemed weird.

The title of the thread says “Defemation suit” :shrug:

  • Like 1

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mugtang said:

The title of the thread says “Defemation suit” :shrug:

I know... but people, like Rebelbacker, were treating it as through it were a 100% Total Trump Victory against her, which isn't accurate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SharkTanked said:

Why shouldn't a porn star be believed? :huh:

Because in Conservobot land, porn stars gave up the right to be believed about anything, because they're horrible immoral people.... just like sexual assault victims. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rebelbacker said:

 

I wasn't gloating about Trump winning so much as making fun of people like you and jackmormon. 

 

 

17 hours ago, Rebelbacker said:

Wait a minute. I was told by numerous legal experts on this board that she had him dead to rights and this was going to take Trump down. LOL!!!!!!!!

You suckers got played again.

#Basta

I don't recall anybody saying that she had him "dead to rights" when it came to the defamation suit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SharkTanked said:

Why shouldn't a porn star be believed? :huh:

 

24 minutes ago, NVGiant said:

Because it's inconvenient. That porn star has been proven to be far more truthful than the lying sack of shit in the White House.

Does this have anything to do with Stormy being "believable"? I don't think so. If it's about defamation, she would need to show that her career was somehow damaged. I think that would be a very difficult hurdle to clear. She's a lot more famous now and I'm quite sure she's doing much better financially today than she was a year ago......Thanks Trump!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, renoskier said:

 

Does this have anything to do with Stormy being "believable"? I don't think so. If it's about defamation, she would need to show that her career was somehow damaged. I think that would be a very difficult hurdle to clear. She's a lot more famous now and I'm quite sure she's doing much better financially today than she was a year ago......Thanks Trump!

Hey, we dovetailed into a broader theme. Don't slow us down now. The defamation suit was always dumb. Proving defamation against a public figure, let alone one who is a porn star, is difficult under any circumstance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...