Jump to content
UNLV2001

He's a liar & stupid people believe him

Recommended Posts

On 10/4/2018 at 9:40 PM, UNLV2001 said:

 

Gotta love this garbage. What Trump is referring to is not just whether she remembered something, some of the problem is she’s remembered different versions at different times. At one point in the past she said it was 1984, then 1985 IIRC and then 1982. She’s give 3 different years as to when this happened. Same thing with the general location, she’s flipped around on where it was in the house, how many people were in the room besides her (used to say 4, lately says 2, and it goes on and on and on.

This woman has mental issues. She puts on a little girl smile and voice, and wags her chair back and forth for the full little girl effect and over-exaggerates a lot of things. “Tell us about your lie detector test of just TWO questions.”  “Well, it’s hard to remember because I was doing so much crying, but they put all these scary wires all over my body, and then a really big man came up from behind me and positioned himself there to ask me questions, and it made me very uncomfortable.” 

How does she function in society if she’s that tender and delicate? The answer is, she’s not. That was theater. She may have had something happen to her at some point, but she was there to sink Kav. And then her lawyers used her. They wanted a public spectacle on TV so they didn’t tell her she could have had it done privately.

Conservatives get to run the country, while the Dems get to post lame anti-Trump stuff on the internet. 🤪😹😂🤣🤠

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/4/2018 at 9:40 PM, UNLV2001 said:

 

Shocking revelation that a politician lied. Are you suggesting that he’s the first? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a liar and it isn't that people believe him. It's that they want things to be the way he portrays them. They identify with a bully who gets what he wants and the ends justify the means.

 

They don't care about fairness unless it's fairness to them. They don't care about immigrants, women, minorities. LGBT. They want to go back in time when white men ruled and everyone else was in their proper place.

  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Slapdad said:

Shocking revelation that a politician lied. Are you suggesting that he’s the first? 

Anyone with ears knows he's a compulsive liar - the likes we've never seen from a presidency - Sadly quite a few can't see or grasp the obvious :unsure:

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, UNLV2001 said:

Anyone with ears knows he's a compulsive liar - the likes we've never seen from a presidency - Sadly quite a few can't see or grasp the obvious :unsure:

They know. They just like what they hear. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, mysfit said:

He's a liar and it isn't that people believe him. It's that they want things to be the way he portrays them. They identify with a bully who gets what he wants and the ends justify the means.

 

They don't care about fairness unless it's fairness to them. They don't care about immigrants, women, minorities. LGBT. They want to go back in time when white men ruled and everyone else was in their proper place.

Those statements are all ridiculous. Most people see through his trolling and know he’s doing it. As far as the ends justify the means, I’d say that the left is just as guilty of this if not more so. The Antifa protests that devolved into violence and people with their silly outbursts to disrupt meetings/confirmations and their bullying are on a much grander scale than anything the right has done lately. 

The left also doesn’t care about fairness unless it’s fairness to them..that’s not unique to either or any side. That’s human nature. And to generalize by saying that people want to go back in time to when white men ruled is as sexist and racist as what the left is so upset about. You can’t complain about your percieved racism and sexism by making racist and sexist comments. That does nothing but invalidate the points you’ve just made. 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, mysfit said:

He's a liar and it isn't that people believe him. It's that they want things to be the way he portrays them. They identify with a bully who gets what he wants and the ends justify the means.

 

They don't care about fairness unless it's fairness to them. They don't care about immigrants, women, minorities. LGBT. They want to go back in time when white men ruled and everyone else was in their proper place.

Oh boo boo. It’s so unfair. Stop with the blame game and everyone’s a victim crap. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, soupslam1 said:

Oh boo boo. It’s so unfair. Stop with the blame game and everyone’s a victim crap. 

Actually Mysfit is right.  Cons don't care about what's right or wrong, or what's good for the country and what's not.  They only care about power.  Retaining it and expanding it.

The confirmation of this shitbag only underscores just how far cons are willing to go to enforce their will.

Which is ironic because cons have made tons of money pushing a false fear-laden narrative of what "liberals" would do if they obtained power.  It's a classic bait and switch.

But cons only last as long as it takes to recognize it.  And that time may finally have come. 

A lot of Americans (in fact a majority!) don't want your vision of a one party system where the minority enforces their will on the majority with impunity.  There are names for such systems.  Democracy is not it. 

  • Like 1
  • Facepalm 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Boise fan said:

Actually Mysfit is right.  Cons don't care about what's right or wrong, or what's good for the country and what's not.  They only care about power.  Retaining it and expanding it.

The confirmation of this shitbag only underscores just how far cons are willing to go to enforce their will.

Which is ironic because cons have made tons of money pushing a false fear-laden narrative of what "liberals" would do if they obtained power.  It's a classic bait and switch.

But cons only last as long as it takes to recognize it.  And that time may finally have come. 

A lot of Americans (in fact a majority!) don't want your vision of a one party system where the minority enforces their will on the majority with impunity.  There are names for such systems.  Democracy is not it. 

Just because it's not your view, that doesn't mean it's not good for the country....it's just an opposing view. Too many people hold the belief that their views are the only correct way. When discussing supreme court justices, It will be a rare answer from a dispassionate person who does not condemn someone on the other side of the political divide. And just because majority power currently rests with the right, that, in no way, means that we have or want a one party system. I would be willing to bet that you weren't trumpeting that message all the years that the democrats had control, so just stop it.....its a silly assertion. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Slapdad said:

Just because it's not your view, that doesn't mean it's not good for the country....it's just an opposing view. Too many people hold the belief that their views are the only correct way. When discussing supreme court justices, It will be a rare answer from a dispassionate person who does not condemn someone on the other side of the political divide. And just because majority power currently rests with the right, that, in no way, means that we have or want a one party system. I would be willing to bet that you weren't trumpeting that message all the years that the democrats had control, so just stop it.....its a silly assertion. 

When a minority goes out of it's way to rig a system to obtain power, refuses to cooperate with the only other party, bringing the government to a stand-still, and ignores the will of the people for agenda driven goals, that isn't simply an "opposing view".  And it certainly has nothing to do with the good of the country. 

 

  • Facepalm 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Boise fan said:

When a minority goes out of it's way to rig a system to obtain power, refuses to cooperate with the only other party, bringing the government to a stand-still, and ignores the will of the people for agenda driven goals, that isn't simply an "opposing view".  And it certainly has nothing to do with the good of the country. 

 

Your answer is an emotional (and unreasonable) one. Power was obtained under the same system that has been in place since this country was founded. Had the results been reversed, you wouldn't be crying foul about the system. And if you are suggesting that Republicans refuse to cooperate with Democrats, but that Democrats are cooperative, then your head is in the sand. Stop wearing your emotions on your sleeve and present a logical argument. Come on man. 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Slapdad said:

Your answer is an emotional (and unreasonable) one. Power was obtained under the same system that has been in place since this country was founded. Had the results been reversed, you wouldn't be crying foul about the system. And if you are suggesting that Republicans refuse to cooperate with Democrats, but that Democrats are cooperative, then your head is in the sand. Stop wearing your emotions on your sleeve and present a logical argument. Come on man. 

Actually my answer isn't emotional at all.  It's a very straightforward look at the discourse.  Cons have been sowing fear into Americans about "liberals" for decades. They have capitalized on the success of that fearmongering and every time they have, they move to consolidate power and reward their benefactors.  Most cons on this board talk about Democrats as though they are all idiots and should not have any power at all.  Where would that leave the country?  Why would cons want only conservatives in authority?

Because cons don't want democracy.  They want power and authority over others.  The biggest con issues are not supported by the majority of Americans.  Do they care?  Will they respect the will of the people?  No.  They will continue to consolidate power and push forward their agenda.

Democracy is dying in America.  And that's not an emotional response.  That's simple recognition. 

History has shown when any country is ruled by one political group, corruption abounds and the country suffers terribly as a result. And this is what cons apparently want, as they don't want to work with democrats, they want democrats to go away.

 

 

  • Facepalm 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Boise fan said:

Actually my answer isn't emotional at all.  It's a very straightforward look at the discourse.  Cons have been sowing fear into Americans about "liberals" for decades. They have capitalized on the success of that fearmongering and every time they have, they move to consolidate power and reward their benefactors.  Most cons on this board talk about Democrats as though they are all idiots and should not have any power at all.  Where would that leave the country?  Why would cons want only conservatives in authority?

Because cons don't want democracy.  They want power and authority over others.  The biggest con issues are not supported by the majority of Americans.  Do they care?  Will they respect the will of the people?  No.  They will continue to consolidate power and push forward their agenda.

Democracy is dying in America.  And that's not an emotional response.  That's simple recognition. 

History has shown when any country is ruled by one political group, corruption abounds and the country suffers terribly as a result. And this is what cons apparently want, as they don't want to work with democrats, they want democrats to go away.

 

 

So you're suggesting that Conservatives, who generally favor less government, want power and control over others? If that's the case, it seems that they're going about it all wrong. And if you think that conservatives have been sowing fear into Americans about liberals and that liberals haven't done the same about conservatives, then that's just proof positive that your posting with your heart and not looking at this objectively. No one party is more guilty or innocent on this (and most things) than the other. 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Slapdad said:

So you're suggesting that Conservatives, who generally favor less government, want power and control over others? If that's the case, it seems that they're going about it all wrong. And if you think that conservatives have been sowing fear into Americans about liberals and that liberals haven't done the same about conservatives, then that's just proof positive that your posting with your heart and not looking at this objectively. No one party is more guilty or innocent on this (and most things) than the other. 

All you have to do is look at history. And then match that to the admitted goals of prominent conservatives working within the GOP (past and present).  It has been a concerted effort to demonize the term "liberal" for at least twenty-five years.  The fruit of that labor is rife on this board.  I doubt there are more than one or two conservatives here that don't equate liberals with socialists and communists.  If you repeat lies long enough and forcefully enough, they can become the "truth" to many.  That's exactly what has happened.

There has never been anything even remotely comparable on the Democrat side.  There were no oath documents, no meetings about non-cooperation policies even if it meant shutting government down.  That's your party. 

The response by liberals has been very slow.  Probably because one of the tenets of being liberal is to be tolerant.  Something that conservatism isn't held to.

I can't think of anything that suggests "less government" is anything but lip service the GOP offers their followers.

The GOP absolutely wants complete power.  They have the house and senate, and they rushed through this supreme court nominee, despite the fact that he proved himself he didn't have the temperament. Why? Power.

George W Bush became President because of a Supreme Court ruling.  The biggest mistake "liberals" made was trying to be fair when conservatives whined about it being wrong if Obama picked the SCOTUS during an election year.  It's obvious now that conservatives look at those actions simply as weakness, and only care about power and winning.

That is the worst possible thing for this country.  As is having a one party government.  And that's exactly where we're headed.

You can look at that and claim "oh, typical liberal, his side lost so he's upset", but that would so completely miss the mark, it's like you can't even see the target.  Winning isn't everything.  And it's not about winning. It's about what's best for the country.  Apparently cons have stopped caring about that a long time ago.

  • Like 1
  • Facepalm 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Boise fan said:

Actually my answer isn't emotional at all.  It's a very straightforward look at the discourse.  Cons have been sowing fear into Americans about "liberals" for decades. They have capitalized on the success of that fearmongering and every time they have, they move to consolidate power and reward their benefactors.  Most cons on this board talk about Democrats as though they are all idiots and should not have any power at all.  Where would that leave the country?  Why would cons want only conservatives in authority?

Because cons don't want democracy.  They want power and authority over others.  The biggest con issues are not supported by the majority of Americans.  Do they care?  Will they respect the will of the people?  No.  They will continue to consolidate power and push forward their agenda.

Democracy is dying in America.  And that's not an emotional response.  That's simple recognition. 

History has shown when any country is ruled by one political group, corruption abounds and the country suffers terribly as a result. And this is what cons apparently want, as they don't want to work with democrats, they want democrats to go away.

 

 

Ruled?  I'm pretty sure all of our leaders were elected.  Think about that.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...