Jump to content
Nevada Convert

Breaking News: Life Long Friend of Ford Named As Being @ Party Testifies Her Story Is Bogus

Recommended Posts

Now this is the 4th person that Ford has named as being at the house that’s disputed her claims. And yet not 1 person has come forward to validate her claims. This new witness that just submitted written testimony through her lawyer to the committee claims that she’s never seen or met Kav in her life, doesn’t recall a party like this. This life long friend of Ford would go to parties together, but recall or think this happened.

Fords lawyers spins it by saying Ford never mentioned it and kept it a secret, so she wouldn’t know. But if they were at a party together, and nothing horrible happened to her, she would’ve noticed something was wrong with Ford even with looks, body language, attitude, etc. And she would’ve seen the 3 other people including Kav. Certainly not a blockbuster revelation by itself, but with the other evidence as a whole, it’s huge. 

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/third-named-witness-rejects-kavanaughs-accusers-allegations/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, she didn't say the story was bogus.  All she said was she didn't recall the incident, party and has never met Kav.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, mugtang said:

No, she didn't say the story was bogus.  All she said was she didn't recall the incident, party and has never met Kav.  

Hey Mug, back off. For Contard that was actually a pretty accurate post. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Old_SD_Dude said:

Lawlorfaithful posted the cnn link a couple hours ago in the Kavanaugh thread. 

I must have missed it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Ford said her friend was at the party, but her friend says she wasn’t. What a cluster phuck. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Old_SD_Dude said:

Hey Mug, back off. For Contard that was actually a pretty accurate post. 

You're right...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Extra Mayo said:

 

 

Another ding to what we want to be quality journalism.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, pokebball said:

Another ding to what we want to be quality journalism.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.54995454014f

I click on the link to the original article, but it won’t load for me. Just me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, soupslam1 said:

So Ford said her friend was at the party, but her friend says she wasn’t. What a cluster phuck. 

Ford also said she told nobody of the incident and then there was a facebook post from a supposed friend saying she knew all about it.  She deleted it later.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mugtang said:

Ford also said she told nobody of the incident and then there was a facebook post from a supposed friend saying she knew all about it.  She deleted it later.  

A bimbo eruption?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, mugtang said:

No, she didn't say the story was bogus.  All she said was she didn't recall the incident, party and has never met Kav.  

I can see anyone that possibly was involved in this party denying they were there or knowing anything about it, to avoid being a part of this national shitshow. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, soupslam1 said:

I can see anyone that possibly was involved in this party denying they were there or knowing anything about it, to avoid being a part of this national shitshow. 

That and the fact that it happened 35 years ago.  Nobody is likely to remember a random party that happened. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ford very clearly remembers the incident in which she was assaulted. It was traumatic and memorable.

 

For other people at the party it was not a memorable event.

 

As for Kavanaugh and his friend, they were stumbling drunk and likely don't have a clear recollection.

 

But it happened, it was wrong and Ford has no reason to lie or put herself through this other than the need to finally air the wretched truth about a man who by his actions is unfit to be appointed to the SC. If trump weren't equally a sexist pig and if the repubs on the committee weren't soulless misogynists themselves they would pull his name and plug in some other equally conservative person without the baggage.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mugtang said:

That and the fact that it happened 35 years ago.  Nobody is likely to remember a random party that happened. 

I have been to a shitload of parties. The only ones I remember are where something spectacularly good or specaularly bad happened. And probably only a small percentage of those.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally, when a woman makes an accusation she's told she needs evidence before questioning a man's reputation. But when a man is accused, whether it's Kavanaugh or Porter or that pedophile trump backed, well gosh golly in those instances the men all claimed to be innocent and that was good enough for trump. And Grassley and Graham.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×