Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

thelawlorfaithful

The Kavanaughcalypse!

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

The accuser is asking for a thorough investigation. Those supporting the accused are doing everything they can to prevent it from happening. That should tell you something.

Come think of it, since Kavanaugh is so adamantly proclaiming his innocence, why isn’t he demanding an investigation to clear his name?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sean327 said:

No one on the Republican side tried to destroy Garland's reputation with a last minute accusation full of holes. He should gotten a hearing and a vote. Most of us on here agree with that, but to equate his not getting a hearing and the destruction of another's reputation as fair turn about is laughable.

It’s fair if the woman is telling the truth. Unfortunately, none of us know the truth.

And there was no last minute accusation because there was no last minute. Who knows what would’ve happened? Maybe Garland would’ve been accused of grabbing Anita Hill’s ass while he was having an affair with a porn star ... all while enjoying weekly hummers from his intern. We’ll never know for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

Come think of it, since Kavanaugh is so adamantly proclaiming his innocence, why isn’t he demanding an investigation to clear his name?

An investigation will not clear his name.  The prior 6 investigations do nothing for him.   What is the FBI supposed to investigate some unknown house during some year in the 80's?

So why would he care either way.

 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bluerules009 said:

An investigation will not clear his name.  The prior 6 investigations do nothing for him.   What is the FBI supposed to investigate some unknown house during some year in the 80's?

So why would he care either way.

 

  

Perhaps because he wants to be on the Supreme Court?    He doesn’t strike me as a terrible guy.   The Lewinski questions memo were cringe worthy though.   If he can’t be bothered to clear things up perhaps someone else should be nominated.   

Posted Image
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, edluvar said:

Perhaps because he wants to be on the Supreme Court?    He doesn’t strike me as a terrible guy.   The Lewinski questions memo were cringe worthy though.   If he can’t be bothered to clear things up perhaps someone else should be nominated.   

So all we have to do to keep someone off the supreme court is make an unsupported accusation of a sexual variety that may or may not have been a crime 30 decades ago during some unknown year at some unknown location.

Not exactly in the spirit of innocent until proven guilty.

I doubt we ever fill this supreme court seat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, bluerules009 said:

So all we have to do to keep someone off the supreme court is make an unsupported accusation of a sexual variety that may or may not have been a crime 30 decades ago during some unknown year at some unknown location.

Not exactly in the spirit of innocent until proven guilty.

I doubt we ever fill this supreme court seat.

Like someone said the investigation af hill took a few days.   Stop being so dramatic.     He is at least going through the process unlike Garland whose sole problem was being nominated by Obama.   

Posted Image
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, bluerules009 said:

An investigation will not clear his name.  The prior 6 investigations do nothing for him.   What is the FBI supposed to investigate some unknown house during some year in the 80's?

So why would he care either way.

 

  

They would interview the people that have already been named, including Blasey Ford and Kavanaugh. One of them will lie which is a felony. One wants to talk about it to the FBI, the other doesn’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pokebball said:

This fact probably helps the GOP towards confirming before the mid terms and the Dems concern about BK's lifetime appointment.  She can still get her claim investigated and adjudicated.  If she is succesful, or depending upon the proceedings, BK might be removed.  Win win, right?

I thought the same thing at my granddaughters volleyball game tonight.  She should show up on Monday, the committee can take the appropriate action, and if she is not satisfied with the results, file charges in the appropriate juridiction.  

110926run_defense710.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jackmormon said:

The accuser is asking for a thorough investigation. Those supporting the accused are doing everything they can to prevent it from happening. That should tell you something.

After this virtuoso performance, maybe you should sit this one out.

 

We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pokebball said:

I get the feminists concerns about BK.  I think they're overstated, but I understand them nonetheless.

I just really, really hope they're not fabricating shyt and so willing to ruin a guys life.  This guy has a wife, a mom and daughters for pete's sake.  I wouldn't ever understand how doing something like this is considered good for women.

And in another article I read, I saw where the CA congresswoman that Ford originally notified about incident said that she believed Ford and that Ford didn't have a political bone in her body, or something like that.  I heard Ford marched a year or so earlier wearing one of those vagina hats.  Don't know if that's true, but it doesn't jive with Ford not having a political bone in her body.

I'm seeing more that hurts Ford and her claim than otherwise.  Maybe I'm not googling in the right places.

This is the new sCroogle, they will make sure you don't find it.

110926run_defense710.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Old_SD_Dude said:

I hope a bunch of old white guys try to “cut her story to ribbons.”  Win battle, lose war. 

You can be extremely nice to someone and expose someone with the simple facts at the same time. She’s never intended to testify. All she has to do is help get this thing delayed enough to hope that the election results would require a new candidate. And when Kav is out, she’s done. 

kat.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jackmormon said:

Come think of it, since Kavanaugh is so adamantly proclaiming his innocence, why isn’t he demanding an investigation to clear his name?

So Muller can find tax return irregularities?  His tax returns are Rock solid, rumor has it they were prepared by MWCBOARD CPA, my guess mug or pokeball.

110926run_defense710.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, retrofade said:

That’s because the big 3 networks aren’t giving them all the facts and reporting it biased. They’re hyping this up as a guy that’ll single handedly overturn RvW.

kat.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bluerules009 said:

So all we have to do to keep someone off the supreme court is make an unsupported accusation of a sexual variety that may or may not have been a crime 30 decades ago during some unknown year at some unknown location.

Not exactly in the spirit of innocent until proven guilty.

I doubt we ever fill this supreme court seat.

To be fair, innocent until proven guilty is hardly the standard that has ever applied to such political proceedings.

Preponderance of evidence would be a more apt standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, toonkee said:

I'm going to say it again.  The dems playing partisan opportunity games does not make Ford's allegations false or less credible. It makes the dems less credible but who gives a shit at this point.   

None of us with a brain that weren’t born yesterday know this has been a carefully planned out, strategic and orchestrated Dem attack on the Kav candidacy. They held on to it as a last ditch effort if nothing else worked. And it nearly worked with Thomas, so why not try it again. This woman will not testify under oath because she’s not going to take any chances of getting caught on perjury charges. She knows she’s lying and that’s what activists like her do. 

kat.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Nevada Convert said:

You can be extremely nice to someone and expose someone with the simple facts at the same time. She’s never intended to testify. All she has to do is help get this thing delayed enough to hope that the election results would require a new candidate. And when Kav is out, she’s done. 

Is she a time traveler?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nevada Convert said:

None of us with a brain that weren’t born yesterday know this has been a carefully planned out, strategic and orchestrated Dem attack on the Kav candidacy. They held on to it as a last ditch effort if nothing else worked. And it nearly worked with Thomas, so why not try it again. This woman will not testify under oath because she’s not going to take any chances of getting caught on perjury charges. She knows she’s lying and that’s what activists like her do. 

It still would have to involve time travel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...