Jump to content
halfmanhalfbronco

The UK detained Canadian and American journalists under schedule 7 (terrorism)

Recommended Posts

The driver is on the wrong side and it looks like that’s a French Flag on the driver’s right arm. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, mugtang said:

The driver is on the wrong side and it looks like that’s a French Flag on the driver’s right arm. 

It could be on the French side of the Chunnel:

http://www.chunnel.org.uk/

They can still be UK border agents. For example, I was in Belgium a few weeks ago and the border agents were British at the Medi Zuid train station in Brussels with uniforms that had patches similar to those.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BSUTOP25 said:

It could be on the French side of the Chunnel:

http://www.chunnel.org.uk/

They can still be UK border agents. For example, I was in Belgium a few weeks ago and the border agents were British at the Medi Zuid train station in Brussels with uniforms that had patches similar to those.

They never made it into the UK so I assume this is correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Denying foreign political extremists entry? Man what country would ever do such a thing?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, happycamper said:

Denying foreign political extremists entry? Man what country would ever do such a thing?

Lauren Southern is far right but not exactly an extremist.  Pettibone was there to interview a best selling author.  

Sellner seems like a piece of work but this is the first I have ever heard of him.  They just made him famous.  Good job?

Just like on campuses here with Milo.  When you deny them speech all you are doing is giving them an exponentially bigger platform once it makes the news.  Dumb logic.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She is conservative on the right. Ban this person. Build a wall. But prevent me from getting in to any country you be damn and my rights are violated.  :hmmm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5490911/Martin-Sellner-Brittany-Pettibone-denied-entry-Britain.html

 

Pettibone and her boyfriend were detained for 3 days.  

 

 

Brietbart will write "UK prevents Pakistani terrorist from entry country"  Then claim a thousands of terrorist from Pakistan are entering the UK., but not being reported by the liberal media.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

Lauren Southern is far right but not exactly an extremist.  Pettibone was there to interview a best selling author.  

Sellner seems like a piece of work but this is the first I have ever heard of him.  They just made him famous.  Good job?

Just like on campuses here with Milo.  When you deny them speech all you are doing is giving them an exponentially bigger platform once it makes the news.  Dumb logic.

 

There's a mile of difference in between "allowing free speech" and "denying entry". You're creating a strawman. Also are you now and have you ever been a member of the communist party?

  • Idiot 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, happycamper said:

There's a mile of difference in between "allowing free speech" and "denying entry". You're creating a strawman. Also are you now and have you ever been a member of the communist party?

No not really and yes.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

No not really and yes.

Not really? Seriously? So you and Norcal are totally against any immigration control because it violates free speech?

Dude think through your positions. You're smarter than this.

  • Idiot 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, happycamper said:

Not really? Seriously? So you and Norcal are totally against any immigration control because it violates free speech?

Dude think through your positions. You're smarter than this.

They were entering the country legally.

Banning Lauren Southern in particular from your country is fuggen stupid.  If you can not see that I can not help you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, halfmanhalfbronco said:

They were entering the country legally.

Banning Lauren Southern in particular from your country is fuggen stupid.  If you can not see that I can not help you. 

The UK gets to decide who enters their country. As you may be aware, they are sovereign. They also have banned Snoop Dog, Chris Brown, and 50 Cent. If they say "no", it's not legal.

Equating immigration control to "free speech" is an argument that is going to bury you dude. Are you really going to go down this route?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, happycamper said:

The UK gets to decide who enters their country. As you may be aware, they are sovereign. They also have banned Snoop Dog, Chris Brown, and 50 Cent. If they say "no", it's not legal.

Equating immigration control to "free speech" is an argument that is going to bury you dude. Are you really going to go down this route?

What was Lauren there to do?  Speak.  What was Pettibone there to do?  Interview.  Why were they denied entry?  Speech.'

Lol at this having anything to do with immigration control.  This is just as stupid as when the USA banned The Kinks.  Was that about immigration control as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, halfmanhalfbronco said:

What was Lauren there to do?  Speak.  What was Pettibone there to do?  Interview.  Why were they denied entry?  Speech.'

Lol at this having anything to do with immigration control.  This is just as stupid as when the USA banned The Kinks.  Was that about immigration control as well?

What were 50 cent and Chris Brown going to do? Perform at a concert. They weren't there to get shot or punch Rihanna.

Sure. You can say that it is a stupid immigration decision... but saying that it is a free speech decision is more stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, happycamper said:

What were 50 cent and Chris Brown going to do? Perform at a concert. They weren't there to get shot or punch Rihanna.

Sure. You can say that it is a stupid immigration decision... but saying that it is a free speech decision is more stupid.

It is just as dumb as banning 50 cent.  This had nothing to do with immigration and everything to do with barring their speech, same with fiddy.  What did it accomplish?  Well it gave each of them millions worth of free advertising.  Good job?

You have no idea if Chris Brown was there to punch Rihanna or not.

  • Facepalm 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

What was Lauren there to do?  Speak.  What was Pettibone there to do?  Interview.  Why were they denied entry?  Speech.'

Lol at this having anything to do with immigration control.  This is just as stupid as when the USA banned The Kinks.  Was that about immigration control as well?

No. It was because they were idiots. The Kinks unfortunately phucked themselves.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, renoskier said:

No. It was because they were idiots. The Kinks unfortunately phucked themselves.

X-Ray is a great read about Ray Davies and the Kinks if you ever get the chance.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

It is just as dumb as banning 50 cent.  This had nothing to do with immigration and everything to do with barring their speech, same with fiddy.  What did it accomplish?  Well it gave each of them millions worth of free advertising.  Good job?

Uh huh. It exerts their sovereignty. You're essentially claiming that the UK has a duty to guarantee free speech of non-citizens who are not in the country yet.

How could that work?

Quote

You have no idea if Chris Brown was there to punch Rihanna or not.

Unless there is a portal in the UK that links directly to Rihanna's face, that's not what he was going to go there for...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×