Jimyma Crow Laws

[AlvinLee]

 

[toonkee]

'sup Maynard.

[NorCalCoug]

Meanwhile...  somewhere in Costa Rica Akkula is nodding his head in agreement.

[Old_SD_Dude]

A kinder, gentler Maytard/Huge Dump. 

[AndroidAggie]

prison planet

oygevalt

[AlvinLee]

12 hours ago, AndroidAggie said:

prison planet

oygevalt

I google "oygevalt". So "enough with Prison Planet already"?

HBO is promoting Apartheid, but your problem is with Prison Planet?

 

 

[Boise fan]

6 minutes ago, AlvinLee said:

I google "oygevalt". So "enough with Prison Planet already"?

HBO is promoting Apartheid, but your problem is with Prison Planet?

 

 

Stop taking a huge dump on things, Maynard.

You're not fooling anyone.

[AlvinLee]

I noticed a lot of angry people lashing out at me, trying to associate me with someone else.

I'm sorry if this Maynard guy dumped you all. It must have been a special kind of love that you guys had. But I'm not him, I'm Alvin. So changing the subject from your racism to that isn't going to work.

[AndroidAggie]

'people are being mean to me by saying my sources suck so they are racist' 

Cmon man

[AlvinLee]

37 minutes ago, AndroidAggie said:

'people are being mean to me by saying my sources suck so they are racist' 

Cmon man

From all I can gather, I think you meant that you think "the messenger" sucks, and that you wouldn't mind if he got shot.

The actual "source' here is the woman promoting racial segregation, in the OP.

FYI, those of us outside of the Democrat Party consider racial division a BAD thing.

[AndroidAggie]

10 minutes ago, AlvinLee said:

From all I can gather, I think you meant that you think "the messenger" sucks, and that you wouldn't mind if he got shot.

The actual "source' here is the woman promoting racial segregation, in the OP.

FYI, those of us outside of the Democrat Party consider racial division a BAD thing.

stop whining.  stop equating disagreement with "must be a democrat" or "wouldn't mind if the guy got shot" -- unless you got pissed that your dear leader nacho duce is cool with shooting people on 5th avenue and his supporters wouldn't leave him, you have precisely zero high ground here.

for those of us who are capable of thinking straight: alex jones, infowars, and prison planet are not reputable sources and suck big sweaty balls when it comes to retelling stories and reporting what's going on in a factual non-alarmist way.  no one - you, me, NO ONE - has the time to vet every single solitary claim.  vice has a slant, oh most definitely, but they are more reputable than alex freaking jones.  so when i see infowars, prisonplanet, and/or alex jones, i ignore it and move on.  

if you want my attention, post a link to the full interview, highlight the portions that are concerning to you, and demonstrate why that person's interview is indicative of a broad current of thinking and whether or not that current of thinking has permeated beyond her circle.  furthermore, demonstrate that the interview is doing more than exploration of alternative views and instead endorsing them in an attempt to fan the flames of divisiveness.  (hint, it's not)

[youngredbullfan]

11 hours ago, AndroidAggie said:

stop whining.  stop equating disagreement with "must be a democrat" or "wouldn't mind if the guy got shot" -- unless you got pissed that your dear leader nacho duce is cool with shooting people on 5th avenue and his supporters wouldn't leave him, you have precisely zero high ground here.

for those of us who are capable of thinking straight: alex jones, infowars, and prison planet are not reputable sources and suck big sweaty balls when it comes to retelling stories and reporting what's going on in a factual non-alarmist way.  no one - you, me, NO ONE - has the time to vet every single solitary claim.  vice has a slant, oh most definitely, but they are more reputable than alex freaking jones.  so when i see infowars, prisonplanet, and/or alex jones, i ignore it and move on.  

if you want my attention, post a link to the full interview, highlight the portions that are concerning to you, and demonstrate why that person's interview is indicative of a broad current of thinking and whether or not that current of thinking has permeated beyond her circle.  furthermore, demonstrate that the interview is doing more than exploration of alternative views and instead endorsing them in an attempt to fan the flames of divisiveness.  (hint, it's not)

Furthermore, based on the excerpt it seems like she's venting. It's definitely not meant to be some kind of serious policy prescription. 

[NorCalCoug]

SMH at the excuse making for this incredibly blatant display of racism...  She’s just venting???  LMAO!

[youngredbullfan]

39 minutes ago, NorCalCoug said:

SMH at the excuse making for this incredibly blatant display of racism...  She’s just venting???  LMAO!

Uh... yes. Do you think she is actively pursuing this as a policy prescription? Do you think there is any larger movement to enact this law? You are a retarded, triggered snowflake.

[NorCalCoug]

19 minutes ago, youngrebelfan40 said:

Uh... yes. Do you think she is actively pursuing this as a policy prescription? Do you think there is any larger movement to enact this law? You are a retarded, triggered snowflake.

I don’t care if it’s policy prescription or not.  What she said is racist.  No amount of butthurt or name calling on your part changes that.  If Trump said anything remotely similar you and the other victims of Trump Derangement Syndrome would be all over it on this board.  

[youngredbullfan]

6 minutes ago, NorCalCoug said:

I don’t care if it’s policy prescription or not.  What she said is racist.  No amount of butthurt or name calling on your part changes that.  If Trump said anything remotely similar you and the Trump Derangement Syndrome brugade would be all over it on this board.

Well, because she does not have the power to oppress anyone, she is definitely not "racist" as defined by people who are educated. 

She's definitely bigoted though. And what she said is stupid as hell, your predictable snowflake overreaction to it notwithstanding.

That TDS shit is never going to stick. Talk about try-hard lameness. Plus Trump is the most powerful person on earth with the ability to actually enact discriminatory policies (which he has already begun) 

It's funny, she's powerless yet you're still triggered out of your mind. It must suck flinching at bogeymen all the time, you little shrunken violet. 

[NorCalCoug]

20 minutes ago, youngrebelfan40 said:

Well, because she does not have the power to oppress anyone, she is definitely not "racist" as defined by people who are educated. 

She's definitely bigoted though. And what she said is stupid as hell, your predictable snowflake overreaction to it notwithstanding.

That TDS shit is never going to stick. Talk about try-hard lameness. Plus Trump is the most powerful person on earth with the ability to actually enact discriminatory policies (which he has already begun) 

It's funny, she's powerless yet you're still triggered out of your mind. It must suck flinching at bogeymen all the time, you little shrunken violet. 

So what she said isn’t racist because she doesn’t have power to “oppress” people?  Just stop....  I’m not the one that’s triggered here.  I’m laughing at you right now as you flip out and call me names because I call an obvious racially charged tantrum racist!  LOL

[happycamper]

31 minutes ago, NorCalCoug said:

I don’t care if it’s policy prescription or not.  What she said is racist.  No amount of butthurt or name calling on your part changes that.  If Trump said anything remotely similar you and the other victims of Trump Derangement Syndrome would be all over it on this board.  

People say racist rants on youtube all the time. ACting like it matters is the stupidity, you can always find the one retarded asshole to open their mouths and act like an idiot

[NorCalCoug]

2 minutes ago, happycamper said:

People say racist rants on youtube all the time. ACting like it matters is the stupidity, you can always find the one retarded asshole to open their mouths and act like an idiot

Yes they do but because it’s not “policy prescription” or “just venting” doesn’t make the rants any less racist,

[youngredbullfan]

17 minutes ago, NorCalCoug said:

So what she said isn’t racist because she doesn’t have power to “oppress” people?  Just stop....  I’m not the one that’s triggered here.  I’m laughing at you right now as you flip out and call me names because I call an obvious racially charged tantrum racist!  LOL

Yes, it is merely bigoted, not racist, because she lacks the institutional and economic power to enforce her views in any substantive way, and there is not a wider intellectual and social complex of discrimination in which her views help to fuel.

You lack the intellectual capacity to engage in debate on this issue with me. Stop trying to box with god.