Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

pokerider

This is Dems endgame

Recommended Posts

This is the endgame for Democrats.  The reasons Dems are doing things such as eventually giving people citizenship to get their votes is to get power and eventually go after companies they don't like.  Their 2 biggest things they would do would be gov't controlled healthcare and climate change.  And to pay for it they would actively sue all the oil, gas and coal companies.  They would simply stack the courts with the liberal judges, which they already have in many districts but obviously need the SC as well.   But it wouldn't end with oil companies, they would next go after food companies, drug companies, and eventually any company that didn't tow their pc line.  

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/nyc-sues-oil-companies-for-the-cost-of-adapting-to-climate-change/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, pokerider said:

This is the endgame for Democrats.  The reasons Dems are doing things such as eventually giving people citizenship to get their votes is to get power and eventually go after companies they don't like.  Their 2 biggest things they would do would be gov't controlled healthcare and climate change.  And to pay for it they would actively sue all the oil, gas and coal companies.  They would simply stack the courts with the liberal judges, which they already have in many districts but obviously need the SC as well.   But it wouldn't end with oil companies, they would next go after food companies, drug companies, and eventually any company that didn't tow their pc line.  

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/nyc-sues-oil-companies-for-the-cost-of-adapting-to-climate-change/

stupid-idea-award.jpg

Congratulations!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dems' biggest problem is ignoring the Midwest and focusing only on the coasts. Their national party platform has nothing in common with a Dem running in a place like Montana, and really hurts their chances on the interior of the United States. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, 406WarriorFan said:

Dems' biggest problem is ignoring the Midwest and focusing only on the coasts. Their national party platform has nothing in common with a Dem running in a place like Montana, and really hurts their chances on the interior of the United States. 

 

Does that mean none of those states have Democrat Senators or Reps?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, aztech said:

Does that mean none of those states have Democrat Senators or Reps?

I think it means that democratic Senators like Reid in Nevada have positions not normally associated with Democrats.  Reid for instance had the top rating from the NRA and still does I think.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, aztech said:

Does that mean none of those states have Democrat Senators or Reps?

They're getting fewer and far between, and trends like that will make it harder and harder for the Dems to hold the House and/or Senate in the future. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand people who claim to be 100% democrat or 100% republican. Thats some pretty narrow minded and shallow shit. 

Im half dem and half repub. Both have good ideas and bad ones. Depends on the topic for me. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, WilliamHicks said:

I don't understand people who claim to be 100% democrat or 100% republican. Thats some pretty narrow minded and shallow shit. 

Im half dem and half repub. Both have good ideas and bad ones. Depends on the topic for me. 

 

It's called being a moderate.  I think most voters are.  The noisy far left and extreme right are the real party voters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm an American and a Vet. George Washington tried to warn us about political parties on his way out of office. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both parties establishments are equally shitty IMO. I think both are corrupt and just see us as something to pander to at reelection time. 

The ones that are dangerous are the ones at both extremes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both parties and their candidates get millions in secret money from legal Super Pacs. Alot of this money comes from corporations who own the media and many other umbrella companies who make a tons of money from our tax dollars. 

They run everything and politicians are just their speech readers. 

People who get overstimulated from political news don't understand this. It's a rigged game and our opinions change and mean nothing.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, 406WarriorFan said:

Dems' biggest problem is ignoring the Midwest and focusing only on the coasts. Their national party platform has nothing in common with a Dem running in a place like Montana, and really hurts their chances on the interior of the United States. 

 

Don't elk outnumber humans in Montana?  Too bad they don't vote. Pretty sure they'd vote Democrat.

Be like a large family all last name Elk.  Feds would think they're Mormon.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Boise fan said:

stupid-idea-award.jpg

Congratulations!

Your right!   I agree 100% that the Dems doing things like suing oil companies is completely stupid.  It is intended to drive up costs for those companies and deter people from investing in them.  Of course, looking at the price of oil going up and stocks of oil related companies the past month, its not working at all.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, pokerider said:

Your right!   I agree 100% that the Dems doing things like suing oil companies is completely stupid.  It is intended to drive up costs for those companies and deter people from investing in them.  Of course, looking at the price of oil going up and stocks of oil related companies the past month, its not working at all.  

 

Why do you assume that the "Dems" are suing oil companies?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, renoskier said:

Why do you assume that the "Dems" are suing oil companies?

I'm not assuming anything.  Democrats in cities such as San Fran, Santa Cruz and now NYC are actively creating lawsuits against oil companies for climate change.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, pokerider said:

I'm not assuming anything.  Democrats in cities such as San Fran, Santa Cruz and now NYC are actively creating lawsuits against oil companies for climate change.  

I'll concede that it is Democratic attorney generals and such who are filing lawsuits. However, they seem to be getting help from of all people, the Rockefeller's, definitely not Democrats.

This is a very interesting story:

https://www.npr.org/2016/11/26/503446675/inside-the-climate-change-dispute-between-exxon-mobil-and-rockefeller-family

"David Kaiser and Lee Wasserman who runs the Rockefeller Family Fund, they together wrote a piece for The New York Review of Books that lays out the Rockefeller family positions over time, how they've tried to work with Exxon quietly as large shareholders to get the company to change its ways and then talked about their funding and who they funded and why, what they're doing is civic engagement and not a conspiracy. And so they are going out and, you know - and standing their ground."

If oil companies can be shown to have known that their industry contributed to climate change, and "actively fought regulation by funding groups that would spread doubt about whether climate change is real or not to emphasize the controversy." Then would you say that the lawsuits were without merit?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/12/2018 at 12:01 PM, pokerider said:

This is the endgame for Democrats.  The reasons Dems are doing things such as eventually giving people citizenship to get their votes is to get power and eventually go after companies they don't like.  Their 2 biggest things they would do would be gov't controlled healthcare and climate change.  And to pay for it they would actively sue all the oil, gas and coal companies.  They would simply stack the courts with the liberal judges, which they already have in many districts but obviously need the SC as well.   But it wouldn't end with oil companies, they would next go after food companies, drug companies, and eventually any company that didn't tow their pc line.  

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/nyc-sues-oil-companies-for-the-cost-of-adapting-to-climate-change/

It’s so obvious. The democrats endgame is to turn the United States into the USSR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Democratic Platform:

Hate Trump

Climate Change

Represent minorities

Pro govt.

Pro illegal immigrant

Pro LGBT Issues

Punish "political  enemies"

Pro entitlement

Voted against perhaps the biggest boost to the economy in 3 decades

Ignores the average working stiff.

It has completely lost touch, it has nothing else. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the biggest economic boost to the economy in perhaps three decades?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jackrabbit said:

The Democratic Platform:

Hate Trump

Climate Change

Represent minorities

Pro govt.

Pro illegal immigrant

Pro LGBT Issues

Punish "political  enemies"

Pro entitlement

Voted against perhaps the biggest boost to the economy in 3 decades

Ignores the average working stiff.

It has completely lost touch, it has nothing else. 

 

I don't know which is worse - that you wrote/posted this garbage, or that you actually believe it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×