Jump to content
14dsgraham14

Ban xx-97 now!

Recommended Posts

Just now, utenation said:

LMAO.. I don't think the B12 has the same academic requirements as the P12 when TCU was invited and there's wasn't even a sniff for BSU to the B12 this latest round.  I agree that BSU was more consistent than Utah but the rest of what you said is just fluff. Taking the most comparable seasons for both teams is about as fair as you can get.  Utah has always sold out our stadium since 2003 and did well in TV ratings.

If Utah was BSU's little sister, I sure like the way things turned out for us..

Again, congrats on being prestigious academic school!  You should take pride in that.

Utah, never, ever came close to grabbing the nations attention the way Boise did.  Just facts.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

Again, congrats on being prestigious academic school!  You should take pride in that.

Utah, never, ever came close to grabbing the nations attention the way Boise did.  Just facts.

 

Like I said, being BSU's little sister worked out well for us.  But again, if BSU was the national powerhouse you claimed they were you'd think BSU would have got an invite to the B12 over TCU(since BSU was the supreme King) or even West Virginia. The B12 isn't as strict on academics like the P12.

And today, picked over BYU, and UCF and Houston..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, utenation said:

Like I said, being BSU's little sister worked out well for us.  But again, if BSU was the national powerhouse you claimed they were you'd think BSU would have got an invite to the B12 over TCU(since BSU was the supreme King) or even West Virginia. The B12 isn't as strict on academics like the P12.

And today, picked over BYU, and UCF and Houston..

 

No, we have a small donor base, a government that hates higher education, our academic profile is not even in the same solar system as Utah's (though improving at a remarkable rate) and we are in +++++ing Idaho.

Boise was head and shoulders above Utah during the BCS era.  Not even a question.

Our football program since we joined D1 has been better than yours, and it is not all that close.  Congrats on your med school.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

 

No, we have a small donor base, a government that hates higher education, our academic profile is not even in the same solar system as Utah's (though improving at a remarkable rate) and we are in +++++ing Idaho.

Boise was head and shoulders above Utah during the BCS era.  Not even a question.

Our football program since we joined D1 has been better than yours, and it is not all that close.  Congrats on your med school.  

So what did all the king of the mountain stuff get you besides a little more TV money than the rest of the MWC?  Anytime a BSU coach does anything good, they get picked off by P5 schools.

You guys don't even sell out a small stadium..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

Utahs win over Bama was more impressive than Boise's win over OU but received less than one hundredth the attention.  Gotta suck.... 

 

23 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

There is ZERO comparison as to which program was better in the BCS era.  Boise was far more accomplished year after year.  Our only peer was TCU, in which they still took a back seat in the media.  Utah was our ugly cousin.  

This isn't accurate. Sorry halfman. Ur fever dreams are fueled by tater mold

Remember that every argument you have with someone on MWCboard is actually the continuation of a different argument they had with someone else also on MWCboard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, utenation said:

So what did all the king of the mountain stuff get you besides a little more TV money than the rest of the MWC?  Anytime a BSU coach does anything good, they get picked off by P5 schools.

You guys don't even sell out a small stadium..

 

Nothing, we do not have the academic profile.

There is ZERO question as to which program was the NonAQ premiere program.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, happycamper said:

 

This isn't accurate. Sorry halfman. Ur fever dreams are fueled by tater mold

It is 100% accurate.  The computers, the math, the accolades all say so.

Boise was far and away the premier program of the non AQ era.  Arguing otherwise is ignorant homerism.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, halfmanhalfbronco said:

 

Nothing, we do not have the academic profile.

There is ZERO question as to which program was the NonAQ premiere program.  

 

Or athletic 

Or demographic 

Boise.  It's like slc, tuscon, Boulder, Phoenix, Eugene, corvallis,  Seattle,  Pullman, LA, Berkeley, Stanford.  

But dumber, weaker, slower.   unworthy

Remember that every argument you have with someone on MWCboard is actually the continuation of a different argument they had with someone else also on MWCboard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

It is 100% accurate.  The computers, the math, the accolades all say so.

Boise was far and away the premier program of the non AQ era.  Arguing otherwise is ignorant homerism.  

Lol.  Lmao

Remember that every argument you have with someone on MWCboard is actually the continuation of a different argument they had with someone else also on MWCboard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, happycamper said:

Or athletic 

Or demographic 

Boise.  It's like slc, tuscon, Boulder, Phoenix, Eugene, corvallis,  Seattle,  Pullman, LA, Berkeley, Stanford.  

But dumber, weaker, slower.   unworthy

The city maybe....

Not the football program during that time.  Ours was the best most acknowledged non AQ program. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

Nothing, we do not have the academic profile.

Houston, Cincy, WVU and UCF aren't academic giants. Average at best according to US News.  I don't really think the B12 has modeled their invites on academic profile only.  I think they wanted to fill holes with sports related numbers and possibly snag decent revenue. With BSU's reputation of being King of the Mountain and waves and waves of national interest, I'm surprised BSU wasn't top choice considering BSU's firepower when they were top dog as recent as 2014. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, utenation said:

Houston, Cincy, WVU and UCF aren't academic giants. Average at best according to US News.  I don't really think the B12 has modeled their invites on academic profile only.  I think they wanted to fill holes with sports related numbers and possible snag decent revenue. With BSU's reputation of being King of the Mountain and waves and waves of national interest, I'm surprised BSU wasn't top choice considering BSU's firepower when they were top dog as recent as 2014. 

 

All those programs had larger investment.

There is ZERO question as to who was a better football program.  We shit on Utah, during that time period.  Our teams were soooo much better year after year.  You getting invited to the PAC does not change that.  We were simply the best NonAQ football program during that era.  Period.  If you want me to wreck your ass I can post the year to year numbers,, it would take me a while but just let me know, I have done it before..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, halfmanhalfbronco said:

 

All those programs had larger investment.

There is ZERO question as to who was a better football program.  We shit on Utah, during that time period.  Our teams were soooo much better year after year.  You getting invited to the PAC does not change that.  We were simply the best NonAQ football program during that era.  Period.  If you want me to wreck your ass I can post the year to year numbers,, it would take me a while but just let me know, I have done it before..

 

LOL. It sounds like you're getting sensitive about this..  BSU was a fantastic football program back then. I don't think anyone questions that. 

I'm moving on from this topic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, utenation said:

LOL. It sounds like you're getting sensitive about this..  BSU was a fantastic football program back then. I don't think anyone questions that. 

I'm moving on from this topic. 

Yeah you should...

Boise was the best nonQ team and anybody with an ounce of honesty would acknowledge that.  Sure as +++++ was not Utah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, happycamper said:

Ok.  And beat sjsu by 7.

The mw had more roadblocks than the wac. So bsu would have been as good,  but the likelihood of running the table was lower.  :)

We actually lost to San Jose.. Their rb had a long td called back that would have iced the game for them, but a phantom hold brought it back. I remember watching the replay and giggling to myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...