Spaztecs Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/9/2024 at 2:02 PM, babs said: You guys didn’t do any worse than any other team against UConn. Not sure why anyone would cast stones. This Board has been. 1 Quote "We don't have evidence but, we have lot's of theories." Americans Mayor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebels2k3 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 8:05 AM, bigd said: Gonzaga has never won a championship, they certainly aren't a blue blood. 9 straight Sweet 16s, multiple final fours...how many programs can lay claim to that? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSF Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 10:23 AM, Rebels2k3 said: 9 straight Sweet 16s, multiple final fours...how many programs can lay claim to that? I guess 2 technically qualifies as multiple Final Fours. Puts them tied for 37th. And their 0 titles puts them in a tie for 38th overall. And Sweet 16s is nice, but nobody remembers that. They arent even close to being a 'blue blood'. 2 1 Quote It gives me a headache just trying to think down to your level Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utenation Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 9:36 AM, RSF said: I guess 2 technically qualifies as multiple Final Fours. Puts them tied for 37th. And their 0 titles puts them in a tie for 38th overall. And Sweet 16s is nice, but nobody remembers that. They arent even close to being a 'blue blood'. To me, "blue blood" is more than just wins. It's power, prestige, brand awareness, fanbase, resources/money and maintaining that through bad seasons. Obviously, The Zags have been fantastic under Few but they are 1 coaching retirement away from being a hot mess and irrelevant. They aren't a wealthy Athletics Department. If Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, UCLA, UNC etc. have bad seasons or are in a rebuild with a new coach, they will still always be a blue blood in hoops with everything I mentioned above. In football, Texas(for the most part the last decade) and USC have been average to bad in football, but they will always be blue bloods and the financials show it. While the Big East has been a fantastic basketball conference and UConn has obviously earned their dues, what happens to them if they go on a 5 year skid? Would anyone call them a blue blood? I'm not sure on that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigd Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 11:23 AM, Rebels2k3 said: 9 straight Sweet 16s, multiple final fours...how many programs can lay claim to that? It just depends on ones definition of blue-blood. IMO, it's the top handful of programs. I'd consider North Carolina, Duke, Kentucky, UConn, UCLA, Kansas and possibly Indiana as blue bloods. Gonzaga is no-where near that list. But if you consider the top 25 or so historic programs as blue bloods than I'd include Gonzaga. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebels2k3 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 The fact is very few programs can touch what Gonzaga has done over the past 25+ years. Not sure why people hate Gonzaga so much but it is what it is. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dshawfan Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 10:08 AM, utenation said: To me, "blue blood" is more than just wins. It's power, prestige, brand awareness, fanbase, resources/money and maintaining that through bad seasons. Obviously, The Zags have been fantastic under Few but they are 1 coaching retirement away from being a hot mess and irrelevant. They aren't a wealthy Athletics Department. If Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, UCLA, UNC etc. have bad seasons or are in a rebuild with a new coach In football, Texas(for the most part the last decade) and USC have been average to bad in football, but they will always be blue bloods and the financials show it. While the Big East has been a fantastic basketball conference and UConn has obviously earned their dues, what happens to them if they go on a 5 year skid? Would anyone call them a blue blood? I'm not sure on that. Didn't you forget UNLV on your list..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterfrog Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 12:53 PM, Rebels2k3 said: The fact is very few programs can touch what Gonzaga has done over the past 25+ years. Not sure why people hate Gonzaga so much but it is what it is. Would the Rebels rather have that or the national championship and the four Final Four appearances? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NevadaFan Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 10:53 AM, Rebels2k3 said: The fact is very few programs can touch what Gonzaga has done over the past 25+ years. Not sure why people hate Gonzaga so much but it is what it is. No one hates Gonzaga. One thing isn’t like the other. GU is one Coach away from being USF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utenation Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 11:55 AM, dshawfan said: Didn't you forget UNLV on your list..... I put UNLV in their own top tier above the rest. It’s just too bad you need a VCR to watch their glory days. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utenation Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 11:57 AM, NevadaFan said: No one hates Gonzaga. One thing isn’t like the other. GU is one Coach away from being USF. I like The Zags. Any good western program is fine by me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterfrog Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 I’m not a Gonzaga hater either, but it would be pretty easy to make a documentary several hours long about the history of college basketball without mentioning them at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebels2k3 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 11:57 AM, NevadaFan said: No one hates Gonzaga. One thing isn’t like the other. GU is one Coach away from being USF. Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babs Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 On 4/10/2024 at 10:08 AM, utenation said: To me, "blue blood" is more than just wins. It's power, prestige, brand awareness, fanbase, resources/money and maintaining that through bad seasons. Obviously, The Zags have been fantastic under Few but they are 1 coaching retirement away from being a hot mess and irrelevant. They aren't a wealthy Athletics Department. If Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, UCLA, UNC etc. have bad seasons or are in a rebuild with a new coach, they will still always be a blue blood in hoops with everything I mentioned above. In football, Texas(for the most part the last decade) and USC have been average to bad in football, but they will always be blue bloods and the financials show it. While the Big East has been a fantastic basketball conference and UConn has obviously earned their dues, what happens to them if they go on a 5 year skid? Would anyone call them a blue blood? I'm not sure on that. They’ve won 6 titles in 25 years under 3 different coaches. It’s hard to argue that they are not. In the same time span, the others you mentioned have won a combined 6. At this point, I think it’s hard to argue they aren’t. Especially if you consider UCLA and Indiana blue bloods. They have done chit in forever. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utenation Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 On 4/10/2024 at 5:37 PM, babs said: They’ve won 6 titles in 25 years under 3 different coaches. It’s hard to argue that they are not. In the same time span, the others you mentioned have won a combined 6. At this point, I think it’s hard to argue they aren’t. Especially if you consider UCLA and Indiana blue bloods. They have done chit in forever. I don’t doubt their performance. I just think there is more to being a blue blood. I’m not looking for a debate on this. Which is why I left it as an open ended question. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AztecSU Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 Blue Blood sounds a lot like prom king/queen. If it’s just most money and fans then it’s just a popularity contest. Fine, then UCONN isn’t a blue blood which proves it’s a bs made up designation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NevadaFan Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 On 4/10/2024 at 4:37 PM, babs said: They’ve won 6 titles in 25 years under 3 different coaches. It’s hard to argue that they are not. In the same time span, the others you mentioned have won a combined 6. At this point, I think it’s hard to argue they aren’t. Especially if you consider UCLA and Indiana blue bloods. They have done chit in forever. https://www.on3.com/news/top-ten-college-basketball-programs-since-2000-duke-uconn-kansas-unc-kentucky/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babs Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 On 4/10/2024 at 5:40 PM, utenation said: I don’t doubt their performance. I just think there is more to being a blue blood. I’m not looking for a debate on this. Which is why I left it as an open ended question. That’s fine. We can agree to disagree then. All good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babs Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 On 4/10/2024 at 7:14 PM, NevadaFan said: https://www.on3.com/news/top-ten-college-basketball-programs-since-2000-duke-uconn-kansas-unc-kentucky/ That’s a pretty debatable list. Not sure I think Gonaga is ahead of a lot if schools in this list. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NevadaFan Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 On 4/10/2024 at 8:53 PM, babs said: That’s a pretty debatable list. Not sure I think Gonaga is ahead of a lot if schools in this list. It lists ‘ships, NCAA trips, and athletes. Not sure what data is missing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...