thelawlorfaithful Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 On 9/28/2023 at 11:56 AM, SharkTanked said: I’m not seeing how this context changes anything. Hunter still needed money to pay debts. His uncle still had to go through Joe to get it. An account was wired money from foreign sources that listed Joe’s house. Hunter lived across the country. And AOC is dumber than a bag of hammers. “Mr Turley, considering your position as a law professor and status within the bar, have you knowingly lied for years about evidence of a crime that you saw personally?” duh Quote We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharkTanked Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 On 9/28/2023 at 1:47 PM, thelawlorfaithful said: I’m not seeing how this context changes anything. Hunter still needed money to pay debts. His uncle still had to go through Joe to get it. An account was wired money from foreign sources that listed Joe’s house. Hunter lived across the country. And AOC is dumber than a bag of hammers. “Mr Turley, considering your position as a law professor and status within the bar, have you knowingly lied for years about evidence of a crime that you saw personally?” duh I just don't see proof that the wired money went to Joe. Just because his mailing address was used isn't proof he got the funds. Was the account that was wired money from foreign sources owned by Joe? I haven't seen that reported. There are reasons Hunter would use his Dad's house as a mailing address for an account that have nothing to do with Joe's involvement in the account. I also don't see proof that Hunter needing money from Dad for alimony has anything to do with foreign sources wiring money to an account with the mailing address of Joe's house. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelawlorfaithful Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 On 9/28/2023 at 1:56 PM, SharkTanked said: I just don't see proof that the wired money went to Joe. Just because his mailing address was used isn't proof he got the funds. Was the account that was wired money from foreign sources owned by Joe? I haven't seen that reported. There are reasons Hunter would use his Dad's house as a mailing address for an account that have nothing to do with Joe's involvement in the account. I also don't see proof that Hunter needing money from Dad for alimony has anything to do with foreign sources wiring money to an account with the mailing address of Joe's house. So the money just got there by accident? Lucky day for the crackhead, child denying, brother’s widow banging, also canoodling her sister, lucky son of a gun. Wouldn’t we all like to just find a couple hundred grand magically in our bank accounts addressed to a place when we live 3000 miles away. And it’s the sender who puts in the address. Quote We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tspoke Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 On 9/28/2023 at 2:56 PM, SharkTanked said: I just don't see proof that the wired money went to Joe. Just because his mailing address was used isn't proof he got the funds. Was the account that was wired money from foreign sources owned by Joe? I haven't seen that reported. There are reasons Hunter would use his Dad's house as a mailing address for an account that have nothing to do with Joe's involvement in the account. I also don't see proof that Hunter needing money from Dad for alimony has anything to do with foreign sources wiring money to an account with the mailing address of Joe's house. Thats what I was thinking. WHat does the address listed have to do wit hanything. The money doesn't physically go to that address. From what I understand it was still Hunters account, but I haven't paid super close attention because it all seems like a nothingberder. Didn't they say something to the effect of it was the address listed on his drivers license. That makes sense then why it was included. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharkTanked Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 On 9/28/2023 at 2:19 PM, tspoke said: Thats what I was thinking. WHat does the address listed have to do wit hanything. The money doesn't physically go to that address. From what I understand it was still Hunters account, but I haven't paid super close attention because it all seems like a nothingberder. Didn't they say something to the effect of it was the address listed on his drivers license. That makes sense then why it was included. I mean the guy clearly did not have stability in his life. It wouldn't surprise me if he used Joe's address for pretty much everything. And as you say, a wire transaction makes a physical address meaningless assuming it goes through. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNLV2001 Posted September 28 Author Share Posted September 28 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharkTanked Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 On 9/28/2023 at 2:16 PM, thelawlorfaithful said: So the money just got there by accident? Lucky day for the crackhead, child denying, brother’s widow banging, also canoodling her sister, lucky son of a gun. Wouldn’t we all like to just find a couple hundred grand magically in our bank accounts addressed to a place when we live 3000 miles away. And it’s the sender who puts in the address. The money got where? Into an account owned by who? Joe or Hunter? What does the address matter if the money is being wired? I assume it is only there in case the wire fails. It is only indicated that the money was wired, not physically sent to that address. I don't know the timeline of the texts vs the wire. Was the money immediately wired after that text exchange? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNLV2001 Posted September 28 Author Share Posted September 28 Some proof right here that this Hunter & Biden impeachment performance is just a ply to appease the stupid MAGA base of their party 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandjean87 Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 On 9/28/2023 at 3:22 PM, SharkTanked said: I mean the guy clearly did not have stability in his life. It wouldn't surprise me if he used Joe's address for pretty much everything. And as you say, a wire transaction makes a physical address meaningless assuming it goes through. We have some folks here who are like moths to a lightbulb for conspiracies. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornontheblue Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 On 9/26/2023 at 5:11 PM, retrofade said: why are the right so obsessed with Hunter Biden? Why was the left so obsessed with Stormy Daniels ???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharkTanked Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 On 9/28/2023 at 2:59 PM, grandjean87 said: We have some folks here who are like moths to a lightbulb for conspiracies. I mean people really want to make something out of what looks like nothing. At least as it relates to Joe. The whole thing looks just as bad as the "Russia Hoax." People who were blasting the left for swallowing the Russia conspiracy theories are lapping up the Joe Biden bribery ones. Facts and evidence seem to be in short supply here. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandjean87 Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 On 9/28/2023 at 4:05 PM, SharkTanked said: I mean people really want to make something out of what looks like nothing. At least as it relates to Joe. The whole thing looks just as bad as the "Russia Hoax." People who were blasting the left for swallowing the Russia conspiracy theories are lapping up the Joe Biden bribery ones. Facts and evidence seem to be in short supply here. Confirmation bias among other biases reign these days. There was a lot of hoax about Russia. Some of it (purposeful) Russian disinformation. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelawlorfaithful Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 On 9/28/2023 at 2:26 PM, SharkTanked said: The money got where? Into an account owned by who? Joe or Hunter? What does the address matter if the money is being wired? I assume it is only there in case the wire fails. It is only indicated that the money was wired, not physically sent to that address. I don't know the timeline of the texts vs the wire. Was the money immediately wired after that text exchange? It was wired to Hunter a few months after the texts in summer of 2019. Per Jim Biden a few months is “as usual”. Right as Joe Biden was leading everybody in the polls running for President. Quote We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharkTanked Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 On 9/28/2023 at 10:11 PM, thelawlorfaithful said: It was wired to Hunter a few months after the texts in summer of 2019. Per Jim Biden a few months is “as usual”. Right as Joe Biden was leading everybody in the polls running for President. So Joe never got the money. But he somehow extorted Chinese businessmen to send Hunter money. Which Joe never got. But it's a bribe because people want it to be? Even though Joe never got the money. Just to clarify, Joe didn't get the money. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retrofade Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 On 9/28/2023 at 6:02 PM, bornontheblue said: Why was the left so obsessed with Stormy Daniels ???? Are you insinuating that Hunter Biden had an affair with his dad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornontheblue Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 On 9/29/2023 at 8:24 AM, retrofade said: Are you insinuating that Hunter Biden had an affair with his dad? No you fool. I am saying the silly obsession on the right with Hunter Biden = the silly obsession on from the left (you) with Stormy Daniels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retrofade Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 On 9/29/2023 at 10:50 AM, bornontheblue said: No you fool. I am saying the silly obsession on the right with Hunter Biden = the silly obsession on from the left (you) with Stormy Daniels. Yeah, there's not actually a comparison between the two. It's telling just how desperate and reaching you are with this nonsense. The left wasn't "obsessed" with Stormy Daniels. The left wasn't holding congressional hearings and trying to impeach Donald Trump because of Stormy Daniels. I know you're not a "true" MAGA, but you're doing a great job carrying their water for them. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonkee Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharkTanked Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 On 9/29/2023 at 7:50 AM, bornontheblue said: No you fool. I am saying the silly obsession on the right with Hunter Biden = the silly obsession on from the left (you) with Stormy Daniels. The Stormy Daniel's thing is dumb but we didn't have Congressional oversight hearings on it. The Russia Hoax is a more apt comparison. Maybe there really is more involvement from Joe than we know, but we won't find direct evidence just like we didn't with Russia and Trump. It will end up being a big nothingburger, and yes, the Dems should not have gone after Trump with impeachment over the Russia influence thing either. It directly set the stage for stupidity like this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulldogBeliever Posted September 29 Share Posted September 29 On 9/29/2023 at 2:20 PM, SharkTanked said: The Stormy Daniel's thing is dumb but we didn't have Congressional oversight hearings on it. The Russia Hoax is a more apt comparison. Maybe there really is more involvement from Joe than we know, but we won't find direct evidence just like we didn't with Russia and Trump. It will end up being a big nothingburger, and yes, the Dems should not have gone after Trump with impeachment over the Russia influence thing either. It directly set the stage for stupidity like this. The Democrats didn't go after Trump with impeachment over Russia. At least their leadership never let them follow through on anything even close to an inquiry. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
