Jump to content
Billings

AI already being used to preoduce new medical drugs

Recommended Posts

makes it easier to put the 5G chips in.

  • Haha 2

The louder someone claims to know something, the less they generally know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2023 at 10:05 AM, Gonzagafan2021 said:

So this might be stupid question but could AI help procreate Human beings?

Not trying to kink shame you, but no, AI can’t +++++ your girlfriend while you watch.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2023 at 12:11 PM, Gonzagafan2021 said:

😂😂😂😂 I've never had a girlfriend 

Chicks dig guys who stream.

  • Haha 1
  • Facepalm 1

The louder someone claims to know something, the less they generally know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2023 at 11:09 AM, Stealthlobo said:

That is fascinating. I'd love to read about the manufacturing and medicinal chemistry of these discovered chemicals.

Machine learning tools to study and investigate molecules and compounds and more is ramping up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2023 at 12:37 PM, grandjean87 said:

Machine learning tools to study and investigate molecules and compounds and more is ramping up.  

Reason I'm interested, is we still dont understand a lot  of medicinal chemistry. A lot of chemical structures theoretically should have certain effects but clinically do something different or nothing at all. 

IE, lysergic acid (LSD) works mostly on 5-HT2a (type of serotonin receptor) but when we stimulate the receptor directly the same effects aren't produced.

Same with chemical differences of ephedrine, methamphetamine, and methylenedioxy methamphetamine (ecstacy). Almost identical chemical structures with profound differences we don't completely understand. It would be really interesting if AI can teach us more in this field.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2023 at 12:10 PM, Gonzagafan2021 said:

I guess I'll still be single then.

Single with cable TV.  nice combo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2023 at 2:10 PM, Gonzagafan2021 said:

I guess I'll still be single then.

Good thing for you there's still porn channels on cable.

The louder someone claims to know something, the less they generally know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2023 at 9:12 AM, Billings said:

AI will be good at going through options we feed it that need a lot of checking. However, AI being able to create something from scratch, to think like a human being would, that’s a very long way off. 

So far I think AI’s current capabilities are over-hyped. You ask it what big cities will look like in 2050, and it looks like George Jetson stuff that might be the case 200-300 years from now at the soonest. ChatOn/ChatGPT has been wrong more than right when I’ve asked some simple questions. 

kat.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2023 at 11:56 AM, Stealthlobo said:

Reason I'm interested, is we still dont understand a lot  of medicinal chemistry. A lot of chemical structures theoretically should have certain effects but clinically do something different or nothing at all. 

IE, lysergic acid (LSD) works mostly on 5-HT2a (type of serotonin receptor) but when we stimulate the receptor directly the same effects aren't produced.

Same with chemical differences of ephedrine, methamphetamine, and methylenedioxy methamphetamine (ecstacy). Almost identical chemical structures with profound differences we don't completely understand. It would be really interesting if AI can teach us more in this field.

I think we’re a really, really long way off from AI actually discovering mysteries of science on its own. Some of the assumptions we think are right that we feed will ultimately be wrong or partially wrong, and it will have to be smart enough to figure that out and then move forward. 

kat.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2023 at 5:08 PM, Nevada Convert said:

I think we’re a really, really long way off from AI actually discovering mysteries of science on its own. Some of the assumptions we think are right that we feed will ultimately be wrong or partially wrong, and it will have to be smart enough to figure that out and then move forward. 

Oh forsure. Even this article is saying it helping us narrow down options that scientist have already hypothesized, not come up with new options or ideas. AI will probably become self aware and destroy us before it solves our mysteries, but it's interesting to ponder.

  • Like 2
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...