Has the MWC created an uneven playing field for it's members? TV bonus money and travel subs come to mind. The way the TV bonus money system and BCS bowl money distribution and over all TV revenue distribution is set up I foresee no school besides Boise building a better football program using that money than Boise St. Recruiting budget, coaches salaries and facilities up-grades. Based on uneven TV distributions and how one school is forced to pay travel subs, the league is holding down their own members in regards to improvements. I think the MWC would be a better league if all members were given an equal chance to succeed based on their overall fan support revenues. All other shared revenue factors should be done equally. That way, it's no fault but your own if your program sucks.