Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About pesik

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Team

Recent Profile Visitors

2,836 profile views
  1. pesik

    Average TV Ratings by Conference. Power 7?

    we do this every year every aac game is rated by Nielsen (on nielsen rated channels) espnu only top mw games are put on nielsen rated channels the aac is the only conference who puts is bad rated games on a nielsen rated channel (p5 put bad games on conference networks or ppv, which aren't rated..no one wants to air bad mwc games ) cbssn isnt rated average is a bad comparison, and people in charge know that..
  2. pesik

    ESPN Way Too Early Top 25

    the fau OC left to houston. he ran their offense. i dont see them beating ucf ucf returns almost the entire offense which was ranked #1 in the nation. even with the early draftees , 8 of 11 transfers offensive players returns. huepel says he doesnt plan to change anything
  3. he said the aac wasnt that good last year in comparison to the other g5 and used our champ losing to army as his evidence ...i noted that how can you talk from that perspective when sdsu lost to south alabama. that wasnt bashing sdsu but stating how can a sdsu/mwc fan use that argument when you have glass house in that debate .. no one in the aac actually dislikes sdsu, fanhood in his words like to keep us in "reality" *cough* trash talk *cough* lol and we make jokes when sdsu loses, not becuase we dislike sdsu but to mock fanhood
  4. bash sdsu???? have you read my posts on the other forum or not....i have always blamed boise and always say sdsu never wanted to leave..that the aac has no problem with sdsu...my conversations with fanhood almost never bash sdsu but are almost simply about his mwc bias ..the only time we discuss sdsu in whenever he tries to bash other schools on things sdsu isn't great on either go to ANY realignment thread, ask fanhood, i always say sdsu if we can go west
  5. its actually 6 not 4, and a 7th .500 season...but back to main point. "history" is all encompassing and doesnt start at your point of preference
  6. thats fine..but he clearly said in "history"..history didnt start in 95...you should stop backing manipulative points... he said smu is one of the worst programs in history ..i note smu has 3 national titles... you guys seem to be the ones lying to yourselves if you believe the first statement
  7. how was our bowl line up not good last year? -champion vs local p5 -#2 vs sec -houston (#6 aac) vs MWC Champion -memphis (#5) vs c-usa champion -ucf (#7) vs sunbelt champion -and navy vs the #2 c-usa (navy was without qb in the game) we had 1 bad bowl that isnt a bad lineup...and what does record have to do with bowl line up????..that is stupid rebuttal in a argument about quality of bowl. that is a meaningless manipulative point. anyone with any smarts can see right through...the big 10 has only had 1 winning bowl record the last decade (by far the worst p5 bowl record)..yet they also have the best bowl line up..better bowls equals harder opponents..equals worse records.... what cycle are you making up? laso the last 2 mwc champs before this year *cough sdsu *cough..lost to south alabama in blowouts..what room do you guys have to talk
  8. smu worst program in history? you realize smu has 3 national titles, a heisman and the award for the best running back is named after a plyer that went there...befroe you give any response your response said "some of the worst programs in CFB history"...history didnt start 20 years ago....hell tulane 3x has more SEC conference championships than Mississippi stage and temple had 10 really horrible years, after joining the big east...but are historically not that bad, theyve been to a sugar bowl. they aeraged 8/9 wins in the mac literaly right after ..and were averaging about 9 wins a season in the 70's... by almost every measurable standard these arent anywhere near the worst cfb programs...and its not even close..they had had horrible stretches but are we going to ignore sdsu was doing 3 wins a season for almost a decade in the early 2000s? and we are heading into year 5 of The AAC, meaning in 2 years almost all the teams will have been in the AAC longer than c-usa...you keep saying we are just c-usa when half the teams were barely in c-usa, and teams like ucf/usf were fresh off the fcs when they were in it...also i watched 2 basketball games the last 2 days..cincy vs florida, wichita vs ok state. and they non stop preached the aac was an elite conference (they werent on the aac payroll)..the aac championship preached about how good the aac was...why are youacting like it is only us hyping us up..everyone hypes us up now..do they say p6? no but almost in their own aords say this is a comparable league
  9. define respectful, fanhood regularly calls us delusional and undermines every single team in the AAC and regularly mocks...but i dont think the poster there mind ....but everytime sdsu losses we make threads trash talking sdsu becuase of him lol but we actually have quite some sdsu posters SDSU-Alum2003 , dshawfan, Badfish, SteveAztec they dont post often and mostly only on sdsu related stuff (like the trash taking sdsu threads)
  10. preseason ranking matter...usf has montain leads there...and before you say they dont in the cfp, look at the first cfp poll its mirrored trends of preseason expectations
  11. thats a lie, the aac fans have always been supportive of sdsu when sdsu was invited...they never felt we were too good...if anything tilll this very day it is sdsu fans who come to the AAC forums to trash tulane as being too good for them some Cincy fans were like that but they are like that with everyone .. im not gonna lie we talked about how we didnt think sdsu football was gonna be good versus us, but not to the point we thought they shouldnt be invited, more of a glad you are here but you are going to be our bottom feeders..ive been on that forum forever and on the old espn blog and when sdsu was expected to join you are flat out making out how we treated ya'll we joke about being too good for sdsu "now" becuase of fanhood (who stirs things up), the stadium situation and our love of trolling the g4, but if an actual invite was given most aac would be happy... lastly you guys post more there than we post here...why are you acting like we just came here to tournament you, me and fanhood have made a frienemy situation and thats mostly from him trash talking on the AAC forums
  12. how did i move the goal post..nowhere in this thread, nowhere in this forum have i claimed houston was the best aac team last year you claimed houston was the best AAC last year (not me) and then claimed the mwc was better becuase the mwc beat them...you inflated houston to make the win more prized, and then ignored any details of the game...i never moved any goal posts 2) no one ever claimed that our #6 or #7 teams were better than g5 champs..no one in the AAC ever claimed that kind of dominance..if the acc #7 was pinned against the mwc#1, acc #8 was pinned against c-usa #1 , acc #9 was pinned against the #1 AAC..i dont expect the acc to have a winning record with that, but that doesnt mean the acc isnt better 3) and you can call it equal second rate bowls. but playing 10-2 wku (with top 25 votes) isnt the same as playing 6-6 utsa which is the disparity in our bowl games 4) the big 10 the most power p5 conference has only had 1 winning bowl record the last 10 year..ONE!! bad bowl records means tougher bowls
  13. every year?? AAC has drawn atleast 2 g5 champions every year, 3 Last year, plus at-least 2 other p5...the mwc champion played the #6 aac 2 years in a row..if the pac12 doesnt qualify enough for vegas itll be 3 years in a row in hawaii and Houston also finished 4th in its division!! we also lost to smu...atleast smu beat us when offensive genius tom herman was still head coach, derek warehime still oline coach, meekins was still assistant head coach..Craig Naivar was still co-dc/special teams coach, Oscar Giles was still the D-line coach..herman cleaned house when he left because he wanted to get a head start on recruiting.. they beat a team ran by grad assistants even applewhite ran the offense through a press box, from a vantage point of view for those games, for sdsu it was the first time he called an offense from the field ...they didn't beat the houston that beat Louisville and Oklahoma stop hyping it like sdsu beat the #1 AAC team, houston finished #6 last year
  14. i never said or even asserted that an offer was out there..i said we are likely to resign with espn...in all those interview he also said the negotiations havent started yet, so why would i say an offer would be made..(literally in all the posts on this thread i has also said, only if the money is right, clearly insinuating there was no formal offer) bruin said the aac will sign with cbs and nbc (and said espn doesnt want the AAC)..And the MWC would be going mostly ESPN and FOX (fs1)..i said you realize the AAC will likely resign with ESPN.. he says the mwc will get more the next tv deal because espn wants sports bar licenses that only the mwc can give,that the fs1 wants all of the mwc because foxsports san diago has some sdsu rights...he says espn doesnt want to get the AAC becuase we compete with the sec/acc network, and espn will get rid of espnu/news..and the only people that will want the AAC is cbssports....since you are defending him im guessing you think all of this too????
  15. lol what reason??? you didnt add any reason to the debate, you simply just told me to agree with your point of view. you just said to admit the leagues are equal, when no legitimate measuring stick says so if you had said the aac has been competitively better than the mwc the last 4 years but im going to need a few more years before i can say the league is better and not a cycle ..that's reason, accepting the reality of situation but adding causation for doubt of the conclusion yeah but facts..