Jump to content

AztecSU

Members
  • Posts

    13,467
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by AztecSU

  1. The only thing you’re right about was the origin time frame for the show. But the fat heads are what got them attention before the team broke through with a S16.
  2. Lmao this post basically proves you weren’t paying attention back then. Try and use your brain to figure out why the BB program finally elevated in stature during the 10-11’ season. Hint it’s something they had never done before and it’s not having a good regular season you absolute phony.
  3. No, but why not an FBS NIT? Let the CFP take their 12, then invite the next best 12 to the NIT and use bowls in the rounds like the CFP. You could add a 3rd tourney(hello CBI). People would watch, and the “bowls” would roll into the new post season format.
  4. He would’ve been far more accurate had he said nearly destroyed the BB program(by sending it to the BW). Oh well.
  5. Between 86 and 96 SDSU was bowl eligible 6 or 7 times, but some "fans" seem to not know this.
  6. The thing that makes you and Spaz come off as phony fans is commentary like you have with ECA here. I walked on 07' and still lived in Bayho when our FB and BB teams finally became good. And I was def lurking here. SGF was about the only one meeting your description, and certainly, no one was doing it in public. Also, throwing out 30 years makes it seem like you didn't watch for any of those 30 years considering we were bowl eligible in the 80's and 90's. Specifically 86', 91', 95' & 96'. IOW, for those who actually paid attention we returned about where we were in the early 90's around 2010/11. But go ahead and make up stories about inflated ego Aztec fans and continue to let most Aztec fans know you are full of it.
  7. Interesting thread but all I know is Fresno got whooped by the worst SDSU team in 15 years.
  8. Bad enough the PAC2 could have a losing record against the MW in FB any given season now…but finishing in the bottom half in BB would immediately cement them as G5 from a perception stand point. Good strategy to save face and keep their options open.
  9. This is probably it...but they may also be going this route to avoid further entanglement with the MW that would make it easier to extract penalties if they left or tried to take existing members with them. That said I think a PAC rebuild is unlikely given it wouldn't be viewed as anything other than a G5 conference anyway.
  10. And still listed as indy lol. Someone at 247 has a little SDSU hate boner.
  11. No Pitt super weapon? No thanks. No enter sandman to start the season? No thanks. No holy war? No thanks. You want to kill CFB west of Texas? Make sure only Seattle, Portland, and LA have teams in the super league. lol.
  12. Just read what’s out there my guy. I’m just sharing what’s in the article. JMO but I think they want D1 to be FB and BB which is why the number maybe larger than expected. Also, around 94 or 95 for FB schools it’s really just the current P4 plus the AAC and MW+PAC2. I will say this, if they cut out most of the B12 and ACC people will stop watching. Nobody actually wants minor league pro football.
  13. The 100 number was referencing the number of schools that might make up the new D1 by an insider. It wasn’t referencing a minimum budget requirement.
  14. If the 100 number is legit I actually think the PAC2+MW makes it in and our hoops may actually be why. https://x.com/rossdellenger/status/1732806534302998797?s=46&t=gQe1OAvM5ukZHrbUuDCYLw
  15. B+ Locally the biggest complaint has been the offense. If you look at what Sean Lewis has done with every offense he's lead this hire absolutely addressed that issue. The real question is his contract and assistants.
  16. I should chosen my words more wisely. I meant the football outlook for the MW. I agree that adding the PAC2 would certainly improve media contract value. Not massively, but at our scale every dollar helps.
  17. We’re not on equal footing. And adding two washed P5 programs that were never even better than Boise at its peak likely aren’t changing the conferences fortunes.
  18. It's been 10 years since anyone from the MW played in a big-time bowl. The AAC just lost its 3 best programs and will still send their champ to an NY6.
  19. I would say if the late-game issues are temporary, you are correct. The Aztecs may be a team that never realizes its potential though. Also, they lack a true rim protector this year(losing KJ is going to hurt), so they will eventually run into a matchup nightmare or two.
  20. Here's my list in CURRENT order. The breaks indicate separation. 1 - CSU 2 - UNR 3 - SDSU 4 - UNM 5 - USU 6 - BSU 7 - WYO 8 - SJSU 9 - UNLV 10 - FSU 11 - AFA
  21. Exactly. The greed of the top schools ruined it for the rest. Hell, if USC doesn’t mislead the PAC leadership two summers ago the movement between the PAC and B12 would’ve been in the opposite direction. An all time failure by the PAC leadership.
×
×
  • Create New...