Jump to content

renoskier

Members
  • Posts

    25,415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Profile Information

  • Team
    Nevada
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Reno

Recent Profile Visitors

34,596 profile views
  1. don't have HBO I'm sure it's a different kind of a school show but my youngest and I really liked Mr Iglesias
  2. I never liked it either. only saw snippets of P & R, looked good but hooked me.
  3. hey hmhb, ya know who got screwed even more? your opponent...Colorado
  4. this Q rating is arbitrary bullshit... beating #25 is not the same as beating #1
  5. it's my opinion I'm not comparing to what others got and I posted my rationale in the other thread. Boise's average of NET, kenpom, and Massey composite is 35.3; late 9 or early 10. You got screwed by being in a play in don't like my opinion...tough shit
  6. no skiing in the AM, sportbook in the PM
  7. exactly I've never seen any proof of this "reputation" bullshit. Every year stands alone. This year may be a little suspect but the only MWC team that I think was significantly under seeded is New Mexico. Boise got slightly screwed by being in a "play-in" but a 10 was the spot they earned. Everyone else is right where they should be.
  8. okay guys, enough gnashing of teeth...it's not that bad Thought I'd try to diminish the human element (all these "Backetologist" were obviously blowing smoke up our asses) and take a look this morning at several popular computer metrics. If we feel the MWC got screwed, who took their place and was over seeded? For the MWC and a sampling of others, I averaged the NET, Kenpom, and Massey Composite. Here's what I found... New Mexico: you got phucked! Average ranking was 22.6. Okay, maybe you get dinged a little for your schedule but IMO should have been a 7 seed. Boise: you didn't deserve the play-in bullshit. Average 35.3. A 9 or 10 was about right but not the 3rd 10. Nevada: should be happy. Average 33.3. So an 8 or 9 seed would have been appropriate. In this case, a 10 is better! Colorado State: can't complain. Average 37. A solid 10 seed. San Diego State: You earned it. Average 21. Last 5, first 6 Utah State: Count your blessing, I guess. Average 41.6. Translates to an 11 seed, not sure being an 8 is really better. Over-seeded? Surprisingly, not Michigan State. Based on their average of 22.6, they actually got screwed with a 9 seed. And my Colorado Buffs also took it in the shorts with a bullshit play-in 10 after averaging 25.3 Here are 5 of the biggest seed "thieves" 1 South Carolina average 44.6 seed 6 2 Washington State average 41.3 seed 7 3 Clemson average 34.6 seed 6 come on New Mexico!! 4 Northwestern average 47.3 seed 9 5 Texas A&M average 45 seed 9
  9. who was the highest NET left out?
  10. yeah, someone had that as a potential...would've really sucked
  11. I wish my Buffs didn't have to play a MWC team
×
×
  • Create New...