Jump to content

bluerules009

Members
  • Posts

    25,848
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    33

Everything posted by bluerules009

  1. What accuser is Emit Till claiming had it worse off than these folks. I mean there isn't a much worse outcome than being falsely accused and executed for it or serving decades in prison. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrongful_convictions_in_the_United_States
  2. HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! Again, where in the constitution is there any rights given to accusers? They don't need any. If they become the accused they have the same rights as everyone else. I am just wasting my time, you have no interest in honesty. I would call you names right now, that you so richly deserve but the boss would get mad at me.
  3. Actually it wasn't. You need to learn what the words you use mean. New York City is not the whole United States. Using government to pay your bribes across a whole country is far different than using a crime syndicate to pay your bribes in one city. Tammany hall didn't use hate and division to drive voters. Tammany Hall didn't make anyone dependent on them for a living, they just bribed them for a vote. You are comparing peas and nuclear weapons stalker.
  4. Your second comment was just as stupid as our first, we never codified rights for accusers because they have no need to have rights. They aren't being prosecuted. They aren't being attacked, they are the accusers not the accused. The only reason they would have difficulty is if their accusations were false. Then of course if found out they would have rights as an accused. So they are already protected. You really have become ridiculously stupid over the last year stalker.
  5. HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! So you are saying Tammany Hall gave housing vouchers to immigrants across the nation and welfare payments as well. Not only that you are saying they stopped paying them when they left the ghettos and were making money right? HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! You always have a unique historical education. One you make up in your head. Good day stalker.
  6. I see no difference between Bush, your hero Obama or Trump on this issue. Authoritarian governments all hate free speech.
  7. English words mean what they mean. I realize it is hard for someone with your limited vocabulary and experience to understand but languages often vary in their usage between countries who speak the same language. Just because your limited education has handicapped you, doesn't mean everyone else has to come down to your level.
  8. Read the posts. Its all there stalker. How much welfare were immigrants receiving in those slums before WWI that encouraged them to stay there.
  9. Show me in the constitution where accusers have due process rights? HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!
  10. The ACLU hasn't been about protecting the bill of rights for decades. They became a political arm of the left at least by the 70's. The NRA is at least an honest organization in comparison.
  11. Maybe you should take an english class. Learn how to use a dictionary at least before you start acting superior. wilful [wil-fuh l] SynonymsExamples adjective willful. Related formswil·ful·ly , adverbwil·ful·ness , nounun·wil·ful , adjectiveun·wil·ful·ly , adverbun·wil·ful·ness , noun
  12. First Assange wasn't living in the United States, he wasn't in jurisdiction to violate a U.S. Law. Second not that you cared but many of the stories he posted showed our government violating U.S. law. Shouldn't they be prosecuted since they are right here and available? Third U.S. Journalists traffic in information stolen from governments and companies all the time. They are not the ones violating secrecy laws and they get to publish it without recourse by the government because of this little thing called free speech. I am not surprised an authoritarian socialist like you hates free speech.
  13. That UConn QB that everyone laughed at wouldn't have been sacked once by OU. We would have won the game with him on our side. The graduation of Rypien will be the best thing that could happen to BSU's offence. A competent QB steps up in the pocket. when there is a free outside rusher, especially if said QB is essentially crippled.
  14. When you can't even acknowledge historical fact you know you have lost. Have fun stalker. You are not worth the effort.
  15. https://www.wsj.com/articles/your-flying-car-will-be-here-sooner-than-you-think-1542327046 he air-taxi dream has been revived thanks to repeated high-tech shocks. Battery improvements are making passenger drone flights feasible. Ride-sharing and routing software, used by Uber and Lyft, makes complex fleet management possible. Technology developed for self-driving cars will one day automate pilot functions, overcoming the greatest hurdles to a flying-taxi industry: high labor costs and the risk of human error. The industry is moving faster than anyone has recently predicted. Take Voom, an app that matches helicopter pilots with passengers. It started servicing passengers in São Paulo in 2017, and its rapid success led to a March debut in traffic-clogged Mexico City. In the U.S.,Boeing recently announced plans to test a piloted air taxi in 2019. Uber has similar plans for Dallas and Los Angeles in 2020, with an eye toward autonomous flight. Air-taxi flights are pricey today, but costs are expected to fall. A representative from Lilium, a European operator, predicted in October that its electric five-seat air taxis will complete the Manhattan-JFK shuttle for $36 a person, significantly cheaper than cab fares, and that the price will eventually fall to $6 once flights become autonomous. The standard prediction, offered by Porsche Consulting and others, is for commercialization of air taxis to occur around 2025, but that may be overly pessimistic.
  16. Little tin horn dictator authoritarian regimes prosecute journalists for telling the truth. That tells you a lot about the current U.S. regime. Next we will get more efficient and take the Saudi approach and just kill them. After we have precedent for it.
  17. Are you a wilful liar? Or can you not read? https://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-is-donald-trump-worth-his-father-gave-millions-investing-2018-10 The Times also found that if Trump had done nothing but invest the money his father gave him in an index fund that tracks the S&P 500, he'd still be worth about $2 billion today. Overall, Trump received about $413 million in today's dollars from his father's real-estate empire, largely because he helped his parents evade taxes, The Times' report says. Forbes estimates that Trump's net worth is about $3.1 billion.
  18. What were you supposed to ask Ford? She didn't know who were there and those she thought might be there had no memory. She had no time or place. She didn't even have a year. Not much left to talk about no matter how much you want to believe her. Not much to ask Kavanaugh either. You can't ask him where he was on a day or if he had ever been to a place since Fords accusation didn't include anything that could be disproved. Five minutes seems like plenty of time to ask everything relevant.
  19. True to form liar and hypocrite even when you are quoted. You are always on your game.
  20. https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-trade-deficit-isnt-a-mortgage-1542327085?mod=hp_opin_pos3 First, the trade deficit reflects only one side of a national accounting ledger. Whereas a homeowner might never see his money or house again after repaying the bank for a reverse mortgage, that’s not true for nation-states. When Americans send dollars abroad to buy Chinese shoes, those dollars will likely come back in the form of capital inflows. That’s why the U.S. capital account, which measures net investment in the country, has a capital surplus equal to the U.S. trade deficit. Chinese shoe salesmen who receive American dollars choose to reinvest greenbacks in dollar-denominated assets. This investment then produces more factories and jobs in the U.S.—something protectionists inexplicably ignore.
  21. You still ignore the point of the post. Immigrants prior to WWII weren't plied with welfare and trapped in public housing traps to keep them poor and enslave them into the democratic cause. They weren't told it was okay to not speak the language and they weren't told their culture was something they should keep. They were expected to become americans. Not black americans or hispanic americans or irish americans, they were expected to become americans. It was the true melting pot. Now democrats are doing their best to promote their culture, to divide the country into hate groups by race and color. Most importantly to trap groups into poverty and dependency on welfare so as to keep them as democratic voting blocks. They don't want today's immigrants to develop into american businessmen and be successful as they might then change parties.
  22. So what? Communism would have still failed. The only difference being we would have been trading partners this whole time not enemies.
  23. The argument was made against Irish, Germans and everyone else. Yet it did not have a political party investing billions in giving them welfare, creating the environment where they become trapped in public housing slums and relishing in the division and hate they can create. To guarantee a democratic voting block for the future. This didn't happen with germans or irish or immigrants prior to the mid 70's. This is the probably the only new idea the democratic party has fomented in the last 5 decades. The only person with trouble seeing the facts is you. Get your eyesight checked.
  24. If you want to change societies like Japan, Nazi Germany, Red China, Vietnam, Korea, etc... You have two workable options. 1) Win a costly war in men and materials to prop up your authoritarian socialist government. Then occupy them for 3 decades at least while building them infrastructure. 2) Trade with them. Option 2 makes us wealthier, doesn't kill our young men, doesn't make terrorists of the world, doesn't break our economy with war debt. Is also arguably much more effective. Of course Option 2 doesn't have the side effect of all that patriotism and manly hero's. It doesn't give our government the propaganda bump that all authoritarian socialist governments love.
×
×
  • Create New...