Jump to content

k5james

Members
  • Content Count

    23,096
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About k5james

  • Rank
    #1 MWC Fan
  • Birthday 05/18/1979

Profile Information

  • Team
    San Diego State
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    El Cajon, CA
  • Interests
    Put some respek on my name!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Reread the UTs CPRA request the UT submitted... "all consultants retained by SDSU to perform work/ services related to the SDSU West project, and the amounts paid to each — by month — since January 2017." Since SDSU cannot publicly support SDSU West you know damn well any discussion of SDSU West had an attorney involved.
  2. UCSD's President has already gone on record saying that land should go to SDSU. Let's face it. Nobody gives a shit what USD thinks.
  3. SDSU won't be spending half a billion dollars to build a football stadium dipshit. SoccerCity's stadium with SDSU on board is actually 32k "capacity" with 2500 of those being SRO. It also cuts SDSU out of any revenue from the stadium except GameDay revenues. No PSLs, not naming rights, etc... But hey, the next time you post something accurate on this topic and not dribbled from Nick Stone's privates will be the first. If this was truly about what's best for the city for you, you'd be voting no on both initiatives so the City can do a full Request for Proposal.
  4. This. Of course everything SDSU has related to SDSU WEST will have gone through a lawyer and be subject to privelage. SDSU isn't allowed to publicly support an initiative. SDSU Mission Valley is another story. That information is pretty much all public anyway though.
  5. Because we've been paying attention and have an understanding of the situation that am outsider wouldn't. Both initiatives failing is far from a "nightmare" scenario. It can be argued it would actually be preferable to both initiatives. If both initiatives fail in order for the land to be sold it would have to be designated surplus land. Once it is designated surplus land the city charter has already established who gets first crack at the land. SDSU would be number two behind government agencies responsible for low income housing. It won't cost SDSU $7M to run that stadium a
  6. No, he's a different kind of nuts. Let him lash out while he can. Soccer City is dead in the water. You know it. I know it. He knows it. Hell, even Citizen Landon knows it. Why the he'll else would he come out of retirement to play in Mexico during what is the most pivotal time of the process?
  7. Lmfao, the city attorney stated the exact opposite. Pardon me if I take her legal advice on the issue over some message board soccer honk. Yes, they were negotiating on building a stadium. Not developing the entire property. Seriously. Keep up.
  8. What color is the sky in your world?
  9. Not when it's etched in the stone of the initiative genius. FFS. For somebody who portends to be so intelligent on the subject you're pretty effing clueless.
  10. That space is designated by the initiative to become condos if the NFL decides not to show dipshit. I figured a mensa like you would know that...
×
×
  • Create New...