Jump to content

happycamper

Moderator
  • Content Count

    25,684
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About happycamper

  • Rank
    PC Rainbow Cop of the Board
  • Birthday 11/15/1987

Profile Information

  • Team
    Gonzaga
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Casper, WY
  • Interests
    MWCboard. Obv

Recent Profile Visitors

29,836 profile views
  1. "The obvious" what? And, holy hell dude, what do you think a "nonpartisan take" would look like?
  2. No, those difficulties are entirely because of how shitty the entire conference is playing year in and year out
  3. I mean... not that much different
  4. 1.4 mil gross a year is "poor"? Christ I should have gotten in to accounting!!!!!
  5. I've posted that a lot of the media has been frankly terrible at covering this whole thing and that impeachment is counterproductive and damaging to democracy (and just stupid... but those first two are more important than just stupid). I do think it gets ridiculous to be totally against an investigation because third parties who you already disagree with are speculating in ways you disagree with. I think that ESPN's coverage of the NCAAT is pretty stupid at times, that doesn't mean I don't like the NCAAT... I needed something to be a step up in weaselness between "lobbyist inventor" and "Michael Cohen" otherwise the sardonic humor of the statement would fall apart
  6. "Completely agreeing with everything Jack is saying" seems to be the only thing you ever consider "honest". Dude... other people honestly believe things that are different from what you believe. It isn't dishonesty or a conspiracy; it's like people are different or something.
  7. Objective? I have no skin in the game, I've said and still say that impeachment would be the worst possible end to the Trump presidency, and overall I've remained mum on this investigation cuz, well, there's been a lot of nothing and now more nothing. What, do you think that you have an objective point of view or something?
  8. What, you're butthurt because I constantly call out democrats for their responsibility in segregation and racial housing disparity?
  9. LOL. Yes, please dig up my support for the "dem tribe" instead of just attacking your tribalism. Please. Ah, yes, because of my well known penchant for posting, ever, about the investigation prior to its completion and my well-known resistance to Kavanaugh. You do realize that there is a record of what people say on mwcboard, right?
  10. YOU PEOPLE DEMANDING INVESTIGATIONS OF MY TEAM MAKE ME SICK! I DEMAND MORE INVESTIGATIONS OF YOUR TEAM!
  11. Given the FBI's history between Hoover, involvement with MLK and whatnot, my overall impression of them was "dirty but competent". They sure have not seemed real competent in this - or at least not competent at investigating political issues.
  12. I mean, I hold them all accountable by not watching any of them. Not really sure how much more I can do than that I agree that certain segments of the media were complete partisan blowhards with no facts but lots of IMPORTANT STATEMENTS on this investigation (and probably on other important stuff but I can't deal with their nonsense) but I don't really know how you punish "wrong and stupid and partisan" other than through starving them of ad revenue. Sure thing skip, as soon as you make an argument for why
  13. What are you talking about? You're digging your own grave. You have completely ceased to even use the window dressing of talking about the special counsel or even the much broader topic of "any problem in America". I've been discussing your disingenuous, lazy posting style... so you are disingenuous and lazy. Dude, attacking a posting style isn't attacking the poster. It's attacking the posting style and often acts as a proxy to their argument. Given how you never offer any argument and instead just bring up increasingly unrelated items in an attempt to stall out any discussion whatsoever that criticism your team, attacking your posting style is entirely appropriate. If you actually think that you are providing arguments in your posting, you are not as smart as I thought.
  14. I save truly personal attacks for irredeemable dipshits. NC is there and jackrabbit is getting there; he finds it ok to attack people's families when he can't mount an argument and when he truly steps in it, he's too much of a coward to acknowledge anything. I tend to attack posting style more than actual posters. You're a prime example; my attacks mean you're lazy and irritating. Other posters deal with it by ignoring you; I deal with it by attacking your posting style. You have chosen "disingenuous" and "vapid" as your style. I don't get why; you're a smart guy and when you try you make good points, you just seem to be unwilling to put in even the bare minimum to contribute. Your smart is being erased by your lazy posting style.
×