Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About CV147

  • Rank
    Super Member

Profile Information

  • Team
    Boise State
  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Rand Paul has a good chance. He was right about the NIH funding gain of function. He was also right about cloth masks being useless. He has been right about COVID even when the NIH and Fauci have been adamant that he was an idiot. The groundswell around him is tremendous and will be greater still once COVID actions are being investigated in retrospect.
  2. Trump has endorsed vaccines. That will hurt him. The most extreme, anti-everything-COVID Republican will win.
  3. Really I could pack heat if I wanted to but I don't even though I own firearms. I am not afraid and I know the scenario of a shootout is slim. I am neither an open carry nor concealed carry guy. That doesn't mean that I would give away my right to arm myself should that situation change. It's better to have the right to guns and not need it than to need the right to guns but not have it.
  4. But the illustration shows the white guy inventing the thing and the black slaves doing the labor. Doesn't that introduce or at least imply a ramification? "It made slaves' lives easier? Oh, okay, that's great!" lol
  5. CV147


    Wordle 222 5/6 ⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟩🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
  6. I'd just question why they'd choose that invention. Yes it was a great one, but there were numerous other great inventions in the history that were far more important than the cotton gin. I'm wondering if they included it because they wanted slavery explored/discussed?
  7. No. The explicit reading is that due to the fact that a well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. You're reading it backwards. Gun rights is necessary for a militia, not the other way around.
  8. I wonder how many shootings are done with legally owned guns. I know it's a very small percentage. This new law will either remove legally owned guns, or create more illegally owned guns, but it won't address shootings. Criminals with black market guns won't care about insurance. It's nonsense. Those who are rich will pay and shrug. Those who are poor and can't afford it lose their right to self defense. I don't know why Democrat ideas are always so regressive. Like fuel taxes, it hurts the poor the most.
  • Create New...