-
Posts
38,325 -
Joined
-
Days Won
117
About thelawlorfaithful
- Birthday 01/28/1986
Profile Information
-
Team
Nevada
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Reno, NV
Recent Profile Visitors
-
SCOTUS refuses to hear net neutrality case
thelawlorfaithful replied to mugtang's topic in Non-Sports items
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/25/technology/fcc-net-neutrality-open-internet.html Hey @mugtang, the rapture has come and we’ve all been resurrected. -
thelawlorfaithful changed their profile photo
-
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
The DOJ is for life. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
Sure, I can do that if you want. Strange ask for someone who didn’t follow it closely, but I assure you the amount of ink spilled on this subject on this board alone would require an arc to survive. Which is to say nothing of the ink spilled everywhere. And the Russian agent stuff was debunked by Mueller. This is about how people kept carrying on the notion that he was guilty of obstruction. The declassified document unequivocally states that he wasn’t. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
You’re wrong. Which is why this release went widely unremarked upon here and everywhere. Clown makeup as far as the eye can see. “Not exonerated” is not a thing in this country. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
The current stuff I’ll wait and see. It is strange to let someone who stole nuclear secrets to continue walking around free. As I’ve said, the notion of Trump pouring over nuclear documents is hilarious. He’s absolutely stubborn and stupid enough to take things and say these ARE MY BOXES. The credulity with which people have taken on the issue is funny as this declassified document highlights. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
There were plenty, this was just the one I found first. Plus there’s the bonus of getting Jack, Blues, Boise Fan, and PokeBall all in one thread. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
I only poo-pooed the ones where the evidence was shaky, or non-existent. Like here! Get him if he did something wrong, but the case better be nailed down airtight. What we have here, and for years, is people shooting themselves in the groin repeatedly, without any reflection. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
The board. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
There’s a 116 page thread on the first page. A ridiculously large amount even after Mueller cleared everyone. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
The classified document speaks for itself. You’re the one spinning here. Keep going. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
Lmfao keep typing. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
I’ve always said if given power I’d act like Ghengis Khan. This is why I don’t seek it. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
I was actually searching for another thread but this one will have to do. Bill Barr was a gem. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
You could have just taken the L and moved on with your life. This was an option. Society gave the same deal to Nu Metal fans. But instead you chose to write this. -
Should he wait until after midterms?
thelawlorfaithful replied to pokebball's topic in Non-Sports items
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/memorandum-to-barr-re-mueller-report-review/244f6c5240fa4804/full.pdf A fair evaluation ofthe Special Counsel's findings and legal theories weighs in favor of declining prosecution. While cataloguing actions that the President took, many of which took place in public view, the Report identifies no actions that, in our judgment , constituted obstructive acts, done with a nexus to a pending proceeding, with the corrupt intent necessary to warrant prosecution under the obstruction-of-justice statutes. Based on the evidence described and the legal theories articulated in Volume IIof the Special Counsel's Report regarding whether the President had obstructed justice in connection with Russia-related investigations, we believe that prosecution would not be warranted in these circumstances, wholly apart from constitutional considerations. Not exonerated was a cute way to put it in the report.
