thelawlorfaithful

I’m aware of his past work. This piece is trash reporting.

If his previous reporting was anything like that piece he wouldn’t have one, other than being a failed talking head.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez/amp?mbid=social_twitter&__twitter_impression=true The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party. Enjoy the fine Journalisming of 2018.

No he shouldn’t. If you want to see more disgusting smear campaigns just like this in the future, reward the Dems for doing it..

You don’t know any of this.

Maybe she gets a fawning Nike commercial?

Both sell out their previous beliefs based on whatever position Trump takes on a given issue

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.54995454014f I click on the link to the original article, but it won’t load for me. Just me?

The lawyer demanded an FBI investigation knowing the FBI has already declined to investigate and also that the proposal was too ridiculous for Grassley to consider. The polygraph test was Ford reading a statement saying her allegations were accurate, not that they were true, but accurate. The therapists notes in 2012 describe an attack in her late teens by 4 boys. They do not mention Kavanaugh, she changed it to two boys claiming the note taker got it wrong, and changed it to 15. Is it really character assassination when you insert yourself into an important proceeding for the future of the country and none of the very few verifiable allegations you make check out? Maybe she is telling the truth, but right now the preponderance of evidence is greatly against her. Max Boot is awful.

Ford told the Washington Post there were four boys at the party, that her therapist’s notes were wrong describing an attack by four boys. The girl was said to be there when Katz gave a CNN interview. There should still be one more witness to go, right?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/22/politics/kavanaugh-ford-accuser-nomination/index.html CNN has learned that the committee has reached out to a longtime friend of Ford named Leland Ingham Keyser. "I understand that you have been identified as an individual who was in attendance at a party that occurred circa 1982 described in a recent Washington Post article," a committee staffer wrote Keyser earlier this week. On Saturday night, her lawyer, Howard Walsh, released a statement to CNN and the Senate Judiciary Committee. Simply put," Walsh said, "Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford." The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford's.

Savage

So I think that’s still a maybe?