OrediggerPoke

You imply that it is possible you have seen worse or close to worse? That’s what I find most surprising.

You cannot adversely possess intangible personal property. The better legal theory would be a claim of 'abandonment of intangible personal property.' However, abandonment requires a subjective 'intent' to abandon. I've never seen Jeffkills make any mention that he intends to abandon this site and allow it to be claimed by any third person. I see no legal theory to support the contention. At best, someone might have a claim/could establish a lien for maintenance expenses if they were to front the costs during his absence but even that is tenuous.

Firing her earlier or not sending her to a press conference after her firing seems to be the obvious way to handle the situation. Having her announce her own firing shows the ineptitude of an athletic leader.

You should have showed up at the press conference with tar and feathers. Might as well embarrass her publicly more. Really seem to care about people there at Utah State.

I would question Utah States’s athletic department to send a fired coach out to a press conference. Awful situation for the emotional coach.

I’m sure. In addition, few states allow for admission without passing a bar exam (although bar exams are exceedingly easy and don’t accurately reflect a lawyer’s ability to practice law). That said - I graduated law school quite a few years ago. Not a single classmate that I’m aware of would write garbage like that.

Spot on! None of this makes any sense.

There is no way that was drafted by a lawyer. Either way, this is a bizarre story.

Bob - somehow I imagine you in very similar attire. But I will give you WAY more credit than Gaetz. Rather than a sweater vest over the shirt and tie, I'm picturing a tank top. And rather than an Armani Suit, I'm picturing 70s style salvation army classic.

That and feel free to share any of the Craig Bohl in a sweater vest under his suit jacket pictures...

WIth McGee's background, he is almost certainly a careful lawyer. This appears to be a serious misstep by Gaetz.

It's not a point worth debating - but if you can't see the difference between Craig Bohl's suit and Matt Gaetz's suit then I don't know what to tell you. I handle some big cases - - we all wear suits - - the NY lawyers that come to litigate those cases here stick out like a sore thumb.

No. Craig Bohl should be himself. He relates well to the State - comes across as a hard nosed, hard working straight shooter.

I also agree. It is stupid watching someone coming to Wyoming dressed in a brand new cowboy hat and boots that you would never even find on the shevles in the state. It is pretty simple. Throw on some blue jeans, a button shirt and some sort of jacket. Then you are dressed professionally for the occassion without coming across as someone that is better than everyone else here.

Like an 'uppity better than everyone else city boy' with no understanding of the climate or culture of the state.