MetropolitanCowboy

Can’t wait. The original one has always been one of my favorite games.

They got the authentic experience they were looking for.

Pay 250k to go on a miles deep submersible controlled by a $40 computer controller that wasn’t even cutting edge in 1998. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. They did pay for the realistic Titanic experience, though, so at least there’s that.

He’ll get house arrest at Trump Tower. Win in 2024. Communicate with his people like Palpatine with holograms. Superior lifestyle type shit.

It’s dead Jim. Reminds me of the Kings deal in 2013.

I heard they’re going to get married at the local Unitarian Church dressed as stormtroopers.

Could run a well with radioactive lead infested water for free and it’d still be a better buy and quality than either Coors Light or Bud Light.

Maybe your kids’ll join the After School Satan clubs popping up. It’s free exercise of religion, after all.

The “history only” standard they’ve applied will.

The GOP at this point with their selected court is more or less the terminally ill kid at the Make A Wish meeting LeBron. They get short term satisfaction, but at what long term cost?

https://babylonbee.com/news/gandalf-the-white-returns-as-gandalf-the-black-upon-hearing-about-1-million-reparations

Sri Lankan

Too much frosting

Tears of the Kingdom is an absolutely incredible game.

The red case for SNES did.

Mortal Kombat with the red case was edgy af back in the day

They’ve always been big on a Right to Privacy up there, it’s even enshrined in the MT Constitution if I remember right.

The Supreme Court up there still is sane.

I’d own a tank if I could…I actually agreed that the “may issue” CCPs were unconstitutional, but I thought their reasoning with the “history only” standard was retarded, it’s so…subjective. Same with the praying coach, I abhor religion, but I thought he got railroaded. I agreed with the ultimate conclusion, but again, using it to kill the Lemon Test was too far for my liking.

No, it’s all firearms. The previous 2 (Heller & McDonald) dealt with handguns; Bruen enshrined the 2A as basically the one amendment to rule them all. Basically, it’s that gun laws regulating conduct protected by the Second Amendment are constitutional only if they have a parallel to the firearm measures in place at the time of the Constitution's framing. I think it’s an asinine standard personally, and I’m probably as pro-2A as they come.

He should sue the attorney for sure, the girl too, but definitely the attorney; file an ethics complaint while he’s at it.