Jump to content

Chalsean

Members
  • Posts

    5,977
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Chalsean

  • Birthday 10/15/1977

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Team
    Boise State

Recent Profile Visitors

8,707 profile views
  1. I rarely disagree with your views but in this I do. You speak of new Mexico demographics, or lack thereof, as reasoning not to invite UTEP. But I don't think Montana is any better in that regard. I agree in taking one of them. UM would be the logical choice to me. But if we're looking at MSU as well, there's no reason not to look at UTEP. On reflection I'd really like to get Montana. Our product differentiation is that were regional
  2. Think long and hard whether you want to be in the money whore division. But I think Montana would be a good add. I'm not sure on MSU. I don't think we need 2 schools from Montana just to get to an even number
  3. Honestly I think that's part of it haha. UTSA is better
  4. I've noticed people started mentioning Rice because PAC4 said they were interested in them (for academics). I would hope MWC would not go after them. Try for 2 of UTEP/UTSA/UNT or bust. Memphis/Tulane won't join MWC and they would have to bring some serious bump in $$ to offset the travel costs. Plus why would they? They probably control AAC now, so its gotta be P4 type money to get to peak their interest. Getting into Texas specifically would be worth it though. Side note, I really wish they'd bring back divisions.
  5. cut him some slack, hes probably reading it on his cell phone at waffle house
  6. i would love it! should have always been that way
  7. I didn't realize we were back to a one bid league.. don't sprain your shoulder too much patting yourself on the back.
  8. If I remember correctly their niche is vet stuff..? But man diff eq was freaking hard at my university, not sure how they could make that subject cake. Think you're just smart dude.
  9. "Not in the top 4 but with BB/FB will be the clear 5th representing regions and territories not otherwise represented." Reading is hard.. There will be 4 power conferences left, so he's effectively saying MWC will be the strongest conference not named B10/SEC/B12/ACC.
  10. It is their last resort but they don't have any other option. B12 is waiting for ACC to implode to poach. But ACC will take longer than the two year grace period P12 has. Unless they want to try indy which they don't have the fan base for and the unknown timeline would be playing with financial fire. The MWC per-team buyout is too much for P12 to afford. It's an all or nothing deal at this point. I'd like to have them join, but I more want the MWC to stick together. They would make us better but them not coming doesn't hurt our current position.
  11. I know it's a business and all but man I really wish there was some kind of gentlemens agreement on at least 2 years before bouncing to a new job. Sorry ags, he was a good one.
  12. Alford averages 5 years per school almost like clockwork. He's not the type to stick around, I'm sure UNR is prepared
  13. $50 million won't make it very far. WSU has $240 million athletic debt and OSU $58 million in athletic debt. WSU currently pays $10 million a year just on debt interest alone. That's not including current P12 lawsuits and operating expenses. Unless the state of Washington bails out WSU athletics, I'm not sure they can afford to join MWC.
×
×
  • Create New...