Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

mugtang

Confess your socks

Recommended Posts

I think this thread has not achieved it's purpose.

Yeah I failed miserably.

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I failed miserably.

I thought it would be honest too :/

Remember that every argument you have with someone on MWCboard is actually the continuation of a different argument they had with someone else also on MWCboard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it would be honest too :/

Yeah...oh well I guess people's socks mean too much to them.

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to this thread, there's only about 5 people who post here. The rest are socks.

Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented by this poster (Warbow) are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Univesity of Hawaii or it's loyal fans. All quotes and opinions from Warbow are valid for 30 days following the date of post transmission and are subject to change at any time. All information published herein by Warbow is gathered from his own opinions or sources which are thought to be reliable, but the reader should not assume that the information is official or fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with myself.

I disagree with me.

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im not going to bring up my cincy sock to giff fvck this hoser.

What I said ^

Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented by this poster (Warbow) are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Univesity of Hawaii or it's loyal fans. All quotes and opinions from Warbow are valid for 30 days following the date of post transmission and are subject to change at any time. All information published herein by Warbow is gathered from his own opinions or sources which are thought to be reliable, but the reader should not assume that the information is official or fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else notice how I4H/GT5555 has avoided this thread???

 

Who?

 

 

Ok, it's true...I am really.....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NevadaConvert

He doesn't always tell jokes...but when he does...they aren't funny.

NevadaConvert, the most uninteresting man in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who?

 

 

Ok, it's true...I am really.....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NevadaConvert

And NevadaConvert is another one of my socks, which means I own you.

Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented by this poster (Warbow) are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Univesity of Hawaii or it's loyal fans. All quotes and opinions from Warbow are valid for 30 days following the date of post transmission and are subject to change at any time. All information published herein by Warbow is gathered from his own opinions or sources which are thought to be reliable, but the reader should not assume that the information is official or fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused. Am I babigos' sock, or is he mine?

Yes

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching a boring movie and this thread made me ponder socks and the purpose or agenda behind them.  CT seemed like a good test subject.  I parsed a month or so of his posts to see what schools he specifically attacked/insulted.  Here are the counts:

 

CTinsults_zpsccbc255a.jpg

 

Some obvious problems are:

1)  Responses to posters who are provoking him.  Retrofade and myself are certainly partially to blame for the high FS count.  Its an interesting contrast, though to Nevada, where Mug and NevadaConvert did their own share of CT harassment and yet I did not see one anti-NV post.

2)  Biased by my own interpretation of an attack/insult

3)  Sample size needs to be larger, but I was bored with it after half an hour of 

 

Anyhow, food for thought for anyone who likes to mull over data.  Assuming the FS skew mentioned above, I see three groups in there.  It's possible it says something about other motives the CT sock owner has.

San Jose State
Announced: 85,235
Scanned: 33,892
Percentage: 39.8%
Actual Attendance Per Game: 5,648

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching a boring movie and this thread made me ponder socks and the purpose or agenda behind them. CT seemed like a good test subject. I parsed a month or so of his posts to see what schools he specifically attacked/insulted. Here are the counts:

CTinsults_zpsccbc255a.jpg

Some obvious problems are:

1) Responses to posters who are provoking him. Retrofade and myself are certainly partially to blame for the high FS count. Its an interesting contrast, though to Nevada, where Mug and NevadaConvert did their own share of CT harassment and yet I did not see one anti-NV post.

2) Biased by my own interpretation of an attack/insult

3) Sample size needs to be larger, but I was bored with it after half an hour of

Anyhow, food for thought for anyone who likes to mull over data. Assuming the FS skew mentioned above, I see three groups in there. It's possible it says something about other motives the CT sock owner has.

He insulted Nevada a few times but you probably have to dig more. But I did do a lot of provoking of him I'm surprised there's not more.

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching a boring movie and this thread made me ponder socks and the purpose or agenda behind them.  CT seemed like a good test subject.  I parsed a month or so of his posts to see what schools he specifically attacked/insulted.  Here are the counts:

 

CTinsults_zpsccbc255a.jpg

 

Some obvious problems are:

1)  Responses to posters who are provoking him.  Retrofade and myself are certainly partially to blame for the high FS count.  Its an interesting contrast, though to Nevada, where Mug and NevadaConvert did their own share of CT harassment and yet I did not see one anti-NV post.

2)  Biased by my own interpretation of an attack/insult

3)  Sample size needs to be larger, but I was bored with it after half an hour of 

 

Anyhow, food for thought for anyone who likes to mull over data.  Assuming the FS skew mentioned above, I see three groups in there.  It's possible it says something about other motives the CT sock owner has.

Can you run a similar study on 8588?

Champ Logo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...