Jump to content

RambleOn

Members
  • Posts

    1,810
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Team
    Colorado State
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Big win for the Rammies tonight. Not going to lie, I was sweating this one going in, but CSU continues to show that experience and coaching can make up for deficiencies in athleticism. I'm looking forward to the rematch at the Pit.
  2. CSU can't afford to overlook anyone. We've done well because of attention to detail and respecting every opponent. Hopefully that continues.
  3. Any unequal revenue share should be performance based and should be assessed on a year to year basis including all programs. Doing the deal with Boise back then didn't make a lot of sense and it makes even less sense now.
  4. BFN played really with the notable exception of 2 very bad INTs. Without those 2 turnovers, the score wouldn't have been as close as it was. I'm ok with the performance last night but BFN needs to tighten things up a little bit, and I think that exactly what we'll see next week in Logan. Kid just has the "it" factor.
  5. I never said that Gonzaga "needed" to be part of the MWC to survive, but long term, I think it would benefit their program and their school more to be part of a more mainstream conference than the WCC. I believe the MWC could make them an attracitve offer to jump on board too. Probably pie-in-the-sky, but that would move the needle for the MWC more than any other school out there.
  6. The MWC is still around right? Shouldn't be that hard to explain... And while I was against disproportionate revenue sharing for Boise, I also understood why it made sense. The same would hold true for the Zags. They would move the needle more than any other program out there, so I think it would be fair to offer them a preferential slice of pie bigger than what they can currently get. The benefits would far outweigh the costs.
  7. A better conference schedule for starters. As is, the Zags have to schedule ridiculous OOC games just to have a respectable SOS. In the MWC, OOC games wouldn't be as crucial. Outside of that, I would be ok offering the Zags a slice of football revenue that they currently don't receive to make the jump understanding that long term, the benefits of having them in the conference would far outweigh the cost.
  8. I don't think getting Gonzaga is a pipe dream... get creative. It would be worth it.
  9. I think the only move the should be made right now is to land Gonzaga and Wichita St. They are the most valuable properties available right now even though they don't play football. Get those two, and poaching from the AAC will make a lot more sense for the remaining schools. Then strategically pick of the schools that you want.
  10. Bad teams find ways to lose... and we did.2 pick 6's and a GW TD called back on a stupid penalty.
  11. Agreed... there was definitely a level of subjectivity to the call and its too bad a great play was denied because of it. Good luck to USU though... no doubt, that was the outcome the conference wanted.
  12. I know I'm biased, but taking great plays away from great players is the bigger tragedy here. I understand rules are rules, but holding doesn't get called on every player either, when it probably could. Refs should let the players decide the outcome on the field.
×
×
  • Create New...