Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

e-zone99

I was just wondering what Big East fans

Recommended Posts

This one will tell you that Utah was the better team on the field that night and deserved the win that they earned.

Utah is the better team, we are really really bad this year and IMHO it is due to the idiot we have as a coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a whole lot of credit giving to Utah, the word mid-major being used by UConn (SF Husky) and South Florida fans????????

Here is the link;

http://www.mwcboard.com/www/forums/index.p...ew_post&f=6

:blink:

Figures. Their students have no idea what level these two schools were when they were attending high school. I suppose ignorance has its privilegies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Utah is the better team, we are really really bad this year and IMHO it is due to the idiot we have as a coach.

I think you are off just a bit.... Louisville is a very bad defensive team this year. It's not like they were really good last #40 320.46 YPG and #17 16.3 PPG (scoring D was good, bend and don't break). But Louisville had to replace 7 of their 11 starter, that's very hard to do... Louisville's O is running about the same 2006- #2 475.31 YPG and #4 37.77 PPG vs 2007 so far- #2 595.40 YPG and #7 45.80 PPG. As you can clearly see the O is rolling but the D really, really stinks!!!

:unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are off just a bit.... Louisville is a very bad defensive team this year. It's not like they were really good last #40 320.46 YPG and #17 16.3 PPG (scoring D was good, bend and don't break). But Louisville had to replace 7 of their 11 starter, that's very hard to do... Louisville's O is running about the same 2006- #2 475.31 YPG and #4 37.77 PPG vs 2007 so far- #2 595.40 YPG and #7 45.80 PPG. As you can clearly see the O is rolling but the D really, really stinks!!!

:unsure:

If that was known then who ranked them so high in the preseason?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at BE fans using "Mid Major"... The Irony... I love it, when UL was kicking arse the last 3 years they were a BE powerhouse.. Now, their own fans are calling them "Mid Major" again..

Someone ought to straighten that board out with a sledge hammer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at BE fans using "Mid Major"... The Irony... I love it, when UL was kicking arse the last 3 years they were a BE powerhouse.. Now, their own fans are calling them "Mid Major" again..

Someone ought to straighten that board out with a sledge hammer...

The true irony of it is Louisville fans (including Maize himself) tossing around the "Mid-Major" label as a derogatory term for their team and Utah when they themselves were "Mid-Major" just a few years ago. Do ya think the move to the Big East hyper-inflated some egos? Just lost a lot of respect for Louisville fans. Way to forget your roots after only a few short seasons. You should ALL know better.

v0icAvfW.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice a couple of CUSA fans pissed off at the usage of the "mid-major" label. They were going to bat for Utah. F the big Least.

True, I was impressed by that. And UCONN fans thinking they're anything but mediocre is laughable at best. Filling your "W" column with crap doesn't make you a good team. It makes you competition with Boise St for the coveted title of "King of the Cupcakes". ;)

v0icAvfW.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep... Ironic indeed.. UL was one of the best teams in CFB in 2004 in CUSA ...

Wow... If there is any BCS fan base in America that should respect the better "mid-Major" teams it is Louisville... The sort of arrogance they display is just remarkable... They seem ignorant of their own history.

As for UConn fans? Well they are just humorous... :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I see it, Utah is a BCS team. LVille, West Virginia, and Pitt are BCS teams. They have all played in BCS bowls. UConn, South Florida, and pretty much the rest of the Big East are not BCS yet. Bosie St. is, the rest of us in the MWC are not, unfortunately. However, I think BYU should be an honorary member since it was our championship that changed college football and started the bowl alliance. ;)

Go Cougs!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, I was impressed by that. And UCONN fans thinking they're anything but mediocre is laughable at best. Filling your "W" column with crap doesn't make you a good team. It makes you competition with Boise St for the coveted title of "King of the Cupcakes". ;)

Boise St thanks the MWC for the neverending string of cupcakes with which we can fill our W column.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow... If there is any BCS fan base in America that should respect the better "mid-Major" teams it is Louisville... The sort of arrogance they display is just remarkable... They seem ignorant of their own history.

As for UConn fans? Well they are just humorous... :P

UConn's only had a 1-A program for just a handful of years now. Less than 10, I think. They only got pulled into the Big Least because of their basketball team and the fact that they were already BE members.

"Once an Aztec, Always an Aztec"

CSU Fresno: Accepting SDSU's sloppy seconds since 1911.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ragtimeJOE

Boise St thanks the MWC for the neverending string of cupcakes with which we can fill our W column.

Can't argue with that. Nothing to do with bsu, but It is odd though that the wac is the only conference that doesn't have a win against a bcs team. I think the sun belt even has 2 or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't argue with that. Nothing to do with bsu, but It is odd though that the wac is the only conference that doesn't have a win against a bcs team. I think the sun belt even has 2 or more.

Odd? Nah, CONSISTENT is the better word. The WAC is horrible against the BCS and always has been. Thank goodness for SJSU, Idaho, LaTech, USU, and NMSt to pad the "W" column. Boise fans can have their one MWC team as well. Still doesn't erase the fact that they've piled up wins over horrible teams.

v0icAvfW.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odd? Nah, CONSISTENT is the better word. The WAC is horrible against the BCS and always has been. Thank goodness for SJSU, Idaho, LaTech, USU, and NMSt to pad the "W" column. Boise fans can have their one MWC team as well. Still doesn't erase the fact that they've piled up wins over horrible teams.

Well you can't really blame the broncos for the deeds of its conference members. All they can do is play the games as they come.

Besides, its not like the Boise St president hasn't made it clear he would accept an offer to change conferences if one was forthcoming. The broncos aren't exactly hiding out in the WAC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...