Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

utenation

I think it's time to really consider

Recommended Posts

For many moons now, one of the knocks on BSU being a good MWC candidate has been their One Trick Pony sports status with their football team.

I think the wait is over...In fact, I think a few of their pigskin players are on this team too.. As soon as BSU gets their academics in order, I think it's time for legit consideration.

http://www.redlasso.com/ClipPlayer.aspx?id...0d-9504c94cb5ea

(takes a minute to load)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For many moons now, one of the knocks on BSU being a good MWC candidate has been their One Trick Pony sports status with their football team.

I think the wait is over...In fact, I think a few of their pigskin players are on this team too.. As soon as BSU gets their academics in order, I think it's time for legit consideration.

http://www.redlasso.com/ClipPlayer.aspx?id...0d-9504c94cb5ea

You surprise me Utenation, from your usual posts about BSU I was beginning to think you considered them beneath you and that you looked down at them. It's truly heartwarming that you are willing to overlook Boise's faults and offer their program a hand up. It's not often you see such a change of conviction transpire on a message board and it shows me that you are indeed the bigger man for it.

Perhaps as a result of this magnanimous gesture the Boise State fans will experience some personal growth and rise up to the challenge.

2me1q87.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy crap.....that's hilarious. Little dude had some skills though, he more than likely could school the rec team I play on! :D

That's Ian Johnson's replacement.. He was clocked running a 4.20-20 time.. Why didn't he run the 40 yard dash you ask? Dwarfs get to be tested in the 20 for obvious reasons.

LOL at his little legs going so fast... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's Ian Johnson's replacement.. He was clocked running a 4.20-20 time.. Why didn't he run the 40 yard dash you ask? Dwarfs get to be tested in the 20 for obvious reasons.

LOL at his little legs going so fast... :D

He could probably find the gap and gain some sweet yards before the defense could figure out where he went (could also see a ressurgence of the fumble rooskie, but he holds the ball and the guard......definitely ESPN top 10 worthy).

Yeah, the little legs were pumping like a 2 stroke engine.....pretty good footwork on a serious note though.

Nothing to really say here.....except GO MWC!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He could probably find the gap and gain some sweet yards before the defense could figure out where he went (could also see a ressurgence of the fumble rooskie, but he holds the ball and the guard......definitely ESPN top 10 worthy).

Better yet the QB could just toss the dwarf for a ten yard gain (more if he lands on his feet and takes off running).

2me1q87.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better yet the QB could just toss the dwarf for a ten yard gain (more if he lands on his feet and takes off running).

Can you imagine what a pass interference call would look like on a 'toss" play? I think "face guarding" could yield a whole new meaning.. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Cowboy Junky

Can you imagine what a pass interference call would look like on a 'toss" play? I think "face guarding" could yield a whole new meaning.. :blink:

You make fun of me for being anti-Utah and launch straight into a thread bashing people with disabilities. ;) Little people have big feelings my anti-dwarfite friend.

This hits kind of close to home for me. My little brother is a dwarf.......

............he's only 6'2".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You make fun of me for being anti-Utah and launch straight into a thread bashing people with disabilities. ;) Little people have big feelings my anti-dwarfite friend.

This hits kind of close to home for me. My little brother is a dwarf.......

............he's only 6'2".

MWC should add Boise State right away, but it won't. It will keep the status quo and not grow and improve. Why won't it do something so obvious and beneficial?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MWC should add Boise State right away, but it won't. It will keep the status quo and not grow and improve. Why won't it do something so obvious and beneficial?

My guess would be that your Presidents don't consider the decision all that obvious or beneficial. My sense is that there is some support for expanding to 10 -- although not an overwhelming one -- but that they are split as to who to add. As such, until that sense becomes overwhelming or until there is a concensus as to who to add, I don't think they are going to do anything at all.

Please don't be overwhelmed by such an insightful analysis. -- it's a rather obvious observation. May be right and may be wrong but either way, it's obvious.

Yoda out...

____________________________________________...

After deleting some of my posts and closing the offending SteveAztec thread, a couple of elites have been able to open it long enough to respond to me anyway.  And since I can’t respond on a closed thread, here is my response…

Other than the initial inquiry, this has never been about letting Steve post again; I doubt that he even wants to post here.  My complaint is about his treatment on this board and the failure of admins to control attacks on him – and worse, to sometimes participate in those attacks.

Steve was first banned on the SDSU board.  When he was banned, it was a sufficiently controversial that they started what became an 8 page thread on the topic to justify the decision (https://aztecmesa.proboards.com/thread/9747/steve-aztec-longer-member-board).  It is clear that Steve had support in the community and there was some criticism for the Board Administrators for having failed to “expel the dozens of people who've been taunting him.”  (And take a look at the thread that I bumped; initially it was supporters happy about Steve getting a radio show.  Then the haters arrived.)

I can’t say if Steve took it too far in response, but I will say that he denies most of various accusations and adds important missing context to others.  But I wasn’t a party to any of the events and can’t say who is in the right and who is in the wrong.  And I have to admit that if half of what has been said about him is true, depending on context, I might well have banned him too.  Or more likely I might have banned those who were taunting him.  (Steve had lost a brother-in-law to suicide and there have been a number of memes of people blowing their brains out, as well as posts blaming Steve or his sister for the suicide – and admins apparently let it go.)

I am in no position to evaluate the truth or falsity of the laundry list of claims made on this board about how Steve responded to all this.  My complaint, however, is about his treatment on this board.  I may be wrong, but his banning on this board at least appears to have been less about what he did on this board and more a carryover from the SDSU banning.  The same taunting continued – more suicide memes – apparently ignored by the admins. Utenation supposedly posted the first and it is explained away because he didn’t know about the suicide.  But was the post taken down?  Was an apology issued?   Indeed, for years, admins on this board have allowed Steve to be vilified based on little more than anecdotal hearsay.  This is a privately owned board, but it is not a private board – anyone can join.  And more than that, It’s not an anonymous board; people know who Steve.  You have a duty to protect your posters from libelous statements and unproven allegations -- especially when, having been banned themselves, they have no ability to defend themselves.

Even Retrofade (who says he’s not a mod but can post to closed threads) put up a “blowing his brains out” meme several years ago.  He knew that Steve lost his brother-in-law to suicide, and he now says that “Steve is a mentally disturbed individual”, which is libelous by the way, but excuses his meme as nothing more than being in “poor taste”.  Apparently it is okay with the board's current admins to taunt a "mentally disturbed person" because the post has never been taken down.  The poster has never been admonished.  And there has been no apology, unless you consider "he deserved it" to be an apology.

In my view, you owe Steve an apology for the treatment that you have tolerated and, in some cases, engaged in.  A former Aztec board went out of business when sued (not by Steve).  It won’t be the last one.  You need to fix this.  You need to administer your board and prevent libelous and incendiary attacks -- hearsay-- on posters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...