Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

bluerules009

Jerkmoron in video

Recommended Posts

I like the guy with the communist shirt....

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BestintheWest said:

LOL. I know right.

I, for the life of me, have no idea why many leftist college students embrace communism as a good thing?

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mugtang said:

I, for the life of me, have no idea why many leftist college students embrace communism as a good thing?

Because they believe in fantasy land communism.

Where everyone drives Tesla's and has the latest Iphone.

All is well, For Rice is gone.                  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mugtang said:

I, for the life of me, have no idea why many leftist college students embrace communism as a good thing?

Or how many "rightists" embrace a POTUS whose election is compromised because of interference by the former head of the KGB in the Soviet Union...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

Or how many "rightists" embrace a POTUS whose election is compromised because of interference by the former head of the KGB in the Soviet Union...

Please provide evidence that the vote was tampered with.  

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jackmormon said:

Please provide evidence it wasn't..

I'm not the one making accusations that the election was compromised.  Burden of proof is on you. 

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mugtang said:

I'm not the one making accusations that the election was compromised.  Burden of proof is on you. 

Every US intelligence agency says the Russians meddled in the elections. That much is clear. The extent, including coordination with the Trump campaign, is still under investigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

Every US intelligence agency says the Russians meddled in the elections. That much is clear. The extent, including coordination with the Trump campaign, is still under investigation.

Ok.  At best the Russians performed psyops during the ejection which is no different than we do in elections around the globe.  As coordination, if it really happened we would know by now. 

thelawlorfaithful, on 31 Dec 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:One of the rules I live by: never underestimate a man in a dandy looking sweater

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jackmormon said:

Every US intelligence agency says the Russians meddled in the elections. That much is clear. The extent, including coordination with the Trump campaign, is still under investigation.

That doesn't mean anything, it would actually be surprising if the Russians didn't meddle in our elections.  They have meddled to some extent in every American election in my lifetime.  This is just the first time the Russians weren't  helping the IRL party so you are mad.

 

You realize we meddle in Russian elections, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jackmormon said:

Please provide evidence it wasn't..

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/us/politics/us-statement-on-reliability-of-election-results.html

Nevertheless, we stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.

The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.

We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thelawlorfaithful said:

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/us/politics/us-statement-on-reliability-of-election-results.html

Nevertheless, we stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.

The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.

Do you understand that since that article was penned in November, new information has come out that European intelligence agencies have tied the trump campaign to the Russian government? The head of British Intel calling it concrete evidence of collusion? There have been FISA warrants executed on Trump staffers? Trump staffers begging for immunity in exchange for testifying? The arrest of the top Russian gvmt hacker on an FBI warrant in Spain and extradition to US this week.

There is new damning information coming out every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

Do you understand that since that article was penned in November, new information has come out that European intelligence agencies have tied the trump campaign to the Russian government? The head of British Intel calling it concrete evidence of collusion? There have been FISA warrants executed on Trump staffers? Trump staffers begging for immunity in exchange for testifying? The arrest of the top Russian gvmt hacker on an FBI warrant in Spain and extradition to US this week.

There is new damning information coming out every day.

Of course what you say really isn't exactly true.   Like you forget to mention some of the information used to get the FISA warrants has been discredited and anyone would ask for immunity in exchange for testifying, including Hilary's whole staff and you claim she did nothing.

There is no denying the fire in your panties though!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mugtang said:

Please provide evidence that the vote was tampered with.  

 

2 hours ago, jackmormon said:

Please provide evidence it wasn't..

 

2 minutes ago, jackmormon said:

Do you understand that since that article was penned in November, new information has come out that European intelligence agencies have tied the trump campaign to the Russian government? The head of British Intel calling it concrete evidence of collusion? There have been FISA warrants executed on Trump staffers? Trump staffers begging for immunity in exchange for testifying? The arrest of the top Russian gvmt hacker on an FBI warrant in Spain and extradition to US this week.

There is new damning information coming out every day.

And none of it suggests the vote was tampered with, does it? Obama administration says so.

giphy.gif

We’re all sitting in the dugout. Thinking we should pitch. How you gonna throw a shutout when all you do is bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bluerules009 said:

Of course what you say really isn't exactly true.   Like you forget to mention some of the information used to get the FISA warrants has been discredited and anyone would ask for immunity in exchange for testifying, including Hilary's whole staff and you claim she did nothing.

There is no denying the fire in your panties though!

 

 
Officials familiar with the process say even if the application to monitor Page included information from the dossier, it would only be after the FBI had corroborated the information through its own investigation. The officials would not say what or how much was corroborated.
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...