halfmanhalfbronco Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v542/n7642/full/nature21402.html Note: This in now way pertains to rapid climate change, but rather another key factor in long term (thousands and tens of thousands of years) climate variations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BSUTOP25 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 22 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v542/n7642/full/nature21402.html Note: This in now way pertains to rapid climate change, but rather another key factor in long term (thousands and tens of thousands of years) climate variations. Nope, sorry. Al Gore said it's because of SUVs in the US so that ends any scientific questioning or research into the matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSanDiegan Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 6 hours ago, halfmanhalfbronco said: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v542/n7642/full/nature21402.html Note: This in now way pertains to rapid climate change, but rather another key factor in long term (thousands and tens of thousands of years) climate variations. Do you have access to the entire article? I don't care to pay $5 to read it, and I'm curious to know what exactly the article says that would refute any of the existing data pertaining to anthropomorphically-driven climate change. Sounds like the article speaks to the role in chaotic orbital variations in driving period (on a geological timeline) changes in our climate, but I do not see how this relates in any way to near-term (30-100 year) climate models. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonkee Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 10 hours ago, halfmanhalfbronco said: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v542/n7642/full/nature21402.html Note: This in no way pertains to rapid climate change, but rather another key factor in long term (thousands and tens of thousands of years) climate variations. 10 hours ago, BSUTOP25 said: Nope, sorry. Al Gore said it's because of SUVs in the US so that ends any scientific questioning or research into the matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfmanhalfbronco Posted February 26, 2017 Author Share Posted February 26, 2017 4 hours ago, TheSanDiegan said: Do you have access to the entire article? I don't care to pay $5 to read it, and I'm curious to know what exactly the article says that would refute any of the existing data pertaining to anthropomorphically-driven climate change. Sounds like the article speaks to the role in chaotic orbital variations in driving period (on a geological timeline) changes in our climate, but I do not see how this relates in any way to near-term (30-100 year) climate models. It does not, really. I just thought it was fascinating. I forgot I have a subscription to nature and papers published to it are all charged. BTW if you can only get one subscription a year, I would recommend nature as hundreds of papers are published to it every year. Here is a summary from the university of Wisconsin http://news.wisc.edu/from-rocks-in-colorado-evidence-of-a-chaotic-solar-system/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happycamper Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 More than just milankovitch cycles then? Cool! Quote Remember that every argument you have with someone on MWCboard is actually the continuation of a different argument they had with someone else also on MWCboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJSUMFA2013 Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Whatever. How soon can we get to one of those new planets to see if there's any oil up there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...