Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

MAD MACGYVER

2016 Active NFL Players AAC vs MWC

Recommended Posts

24570143_BSUBACKGROUNDBANNERANDY1AWELCOME.png.5fa1e131a0fec4c26c0be2f4d0a420eb.png

망치를 가진 남자에게는, 모든것이 못처럼 보인다.

원숭이도 나무에서 떨어진다.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, IanforHeisman said:

Surprised we have more than Baylor.

Don't forget prior to 2011 Baylor was competing annually and often winning with KU and ISU for dead last in the Big XII.  From 1996 thru 2009 Baylor went 43 - 110.  Eleven of those seasons with no or only 1 conference win and never more than 3 conference wins in a season.  Before 2011 Baylor hadn't finished in the AP top 25 since 1986.  Coach Briles resurrected that program from nothing in a relative hurry.

Had Briles stayed at Baylor would they have put more players into the NFL or prison?  Oh wait that's why he lost his job, no one was held to account....never mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, IanforHeisman said:

I remember when the knock on Boise was that they had no NFL talent.. 

That must've been a long time ago.

There are only two things I can't stand in this world: people who are intolerant of other people's cultures and the Dutch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have always said using draft picks to evaluate talent makes no sense..a lot of people say look at our draft picks, we are a talented team, putting no context into it.

 the system you run will define your draft picks...

uconn has so many players in the NFL because they literally run an nfl offense and defense. they get players that fit that mold, spend 4 years developing them on nfl style of play, playbooks and building nfl bodies. and nfl teams take them as they are plug and play 

Houston until last year ran an air raid, ttech still runs an air raid, baylor runs a uptempo spread, and ecu till this season ran an air raid...air raid players barely get drafted, the few that do are combine guys with scary measurements..

in the air raid or any true uptempo offense you get smaller fit players who can last 99 plays a game, a snap every 15 seconds. and through your 4 years you develop them on the air raid. the nfl is a whole different world for them. and plenty ended up not having the bodies needed

but at the end of the day winning in the uptempo is way more realistic especially if you aren't out recruiting everyone (note how every elite, non powerhouse recruiting team runs the uptempo..oregon/tcu/baylor)..and you're there to win games not setup players for the draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, pesik said:

i have always said using draft picks to evaluate talent makes no sense..a lot of people say look at our draft picks, we are a talented team, putting no context into it.

 the system you run will define your draft picks...

uconn has so many players in the NFL because they literally run an nfl offense and defense. they get players that fit that mold, spend 4 years developing them on nfl style of play, playbooks and building nfl bodies. and nfl teams take them as they are plug and play 

Houston until last year ran an air raid, ttech still runs an air raid, baylor runs a uptempo spread, and ecu till this season ran an air raid...air raid players barely get drafted, the few that do are combine guys with scary measurements..

in the air raid or any true uptempo offense you get smaller fit players who can last 99 plays a game, a snap every 15 seconds. and through your 4 years you develop them on the air raid. the nfl is a whole different world for them. and plenty ended up not having the bodies needed

but at the end of the day winning in the uptempo is way more realistic especially if you aren't out recruiting everyone (note how every elite, non powerhouse recruiting team runs the uptempo..oregon/tcu/baylor)..and you're there to win games not setup players for the draft

Nevada has more active NFL players than Texas Tech, but the Pistol isn't exactly an NFL offense either. 

kat.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SpartaRick said:

There has to be a mistake.  Where are the Aztecs in these data?

My guess is SDSU's complement of NFL players is down because of a huge change in recruiting emphasis from Tom Craft to Brady/Rocky. I used to hear rumors that Craft would lure some studs by virtually guaranteeing they would be starters. That was sometimes effective but it hurt when those kids would tell recruiters from other schools and they would pass it along to recruits who played the same position. No such rumors anymore. It's now well known that regardless of your sterling reputation coming out, you have to earn playing time so we're getting a lot more talented 2-star guys than we used to and therefore although we may have less NFL-caliber players than we once did we have a much deeper roster.

Boom goes the dynamite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...