Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

WyomingCoog

CBO: 2.3 million jobs will be lost due to Obamacare

93 posts in this topic

I think the 1st paragraph says it all ..... More people will choose to work less, I think to say 2.3 million jobs would be "lost" isn't accurate. Obviously you will have some smaller companies that choose to have fewer full time employees but I think the article is trying to blame Obamacare for people electing to work less because of their new healthcare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the 1st paragraph says it all ..... More people will choose to work less, I think to say 2.3 million jobs would be "lost" isn't accurate. Obviously you will have some smaller companies that choose to have fewer full time employees but I think the article is trying to blame Obamacare for people electing to work less because of their new healthcare.

 

No you're right....CBS has always had a conservative agenda. I think they're definitely out to make Obama look bad. Dam Republican media. I'm glad you're able to find a way to spin 2.5 million fewer jobs into a positive. Carney? Is that you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No you're right....CBS has always had a conservative agenda. I think they're definitely out to make Obama look bad. Dam Republican media. I'm glad you're able to find a way to spin 2.5 million fewer jobs into a positive. Carney? Is that you?

 

I'm surprised you're putting so much faith into the CBO now, Coog.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised you're putting so much faith into the CBO now, Coog.

 

When have I bashed the CBO?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When have I bashed the CBO?

 

Oh, I don't know of a specific occasion.  I just figured with your political leanings, the CBO would have no pull with you. 

 

Mostly just a silly comment!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to defend the law, because I'm not a fan, but it does say the workforce will decline and not that jobs will be lost.  And nobody should defend the CBO.  In fact there should be a logical fallacy called Appeal to CBO or some such. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to defend the law, because I'm not a fan, but it does say the workforce will decline and not that jobs will be lost.  And nobody should defend the CBO.  In fact there should be a logical fallacy called Appeal to CBO or some such. 

But it cranks out so much stuff you can use it to argue whatever and your source sounds kinda official!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No you're right....CBS has always had a conservative agenda. I think they're definitely out to make Obama look bad. Dam Republican media. I'm glad you're able to find a way to spin 2.5 million fewer jobs into a positive. Carney? Is that you?

 

I'm only pointing out what the article stated in that the decline would be in large due to those choosing to work less or retire early because they now can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm only pointing out what the article stated in that the decline would be in large due to those choosing to work less or retire early because they now can.

 

Shifting costs from employers to the federal government.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But so many more uninsured will now have medical insurance!

A worthwhile trade-off.  :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shifting costs from employers to the federal government.

yep. Federal subsidies are worth more than working those extra hours

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is on both sides. Our medical $ystem is full of corruption, and there are those that are too freakin' lazy to work. Cheaters on both sides! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to defend the law, because I'm not a fan, but it does say the workforce will decline and not that jobs will be lost.  And nobody should defend the CBO.  In fact there should be a logical fallacy called Appeal to CBO or some such. 

 

Yea, I want to know this... Are we talking about potential emplyees dropping out of the workforce, or jobs being lost?  The workforce one makes sense, because how many people will just stop looking for stable work now that they have government health care since benefits are often a huge incentive to get a real job? And if that's the case, then it's going to be reflected in unemployment by continuing to lower the numbers which the democrats will use to say the law is just dandy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But it cranks out so much stuff you can use it to argue whatever and your source sounds kinda official!

 

And its non-partisan!  No slam on the good people there as they're only allowed to analyze a scenario within whatever narrow parameters and using whatever assumptions the requesting party gives them.  Garbage in, garbage out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, I want to know this... Are we talking about potential emplyees dropping out of the workforce, or jobs being lost?  The workforce one makes sense, because how many people will just stop looking for stable work now that they have government health care since benefits are often a huge incentive to get a real job? And if that's the case, then it's going to be reflected in unemployment by continuing to lower the numbers which the democrats will use to say the law is just dandy.

If you skim the part where they talk about this (and I'm not encouraging anyone to do so, because it's dull as dirt) they do say there will probably be some job losses due to the law.  I didn't see them put a number to that anywhere. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, I want to know this... Are we talking about potential emplyees dropping out of the workforce, or jobs being lost?  The workforce one makes sense, because how many people will just stop looking for stable work now that they have government health care since benefits are often a huge incentive to get a real job? And if that's the case, then it's going to be reflected in unemployment by continuing to lower the numbers which the democrats will use to say the law is just dandy.

My understanding is that the job "loss" will primarily come from people working less, not necessarily completely dropping out of the workforce. They will look to stay under the "4X poverty" level so as to maximize their subsidy. Begs the question, wouldn't this mean that there would be the equivalent of 2.3 million new job openings? Companies will have to cover at least some of the lost hours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that the job "loss" will primarily come from people working less, not necessarily completely dropping out of the workforce. They will look to stay under the "4X poverty" level so as to maximize their subsidy. Begs the question, wouldn't this mean that there would be the equivalent of 2.3 million new job openings? Companies will have to cover at least some of the lost hours.

 

Younger workers would rather pay the penalty than participate in either the employer's or exchange's insurance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the 1st paragraph says it all ..... More people will choose to work less, I think to say 2.3 million jobs would be "lost" isn't accurate. Obviously you will have some smaller companies that choose to have fewer full time employees but I think the article is trying to blame Obamacare for people electing to work less because of their new healthcare.

I'm not a guy who wants 70 year old people to have to work, but taking more people out of the taxpaying pool isn't a good thing. 

The Baby Boomers have saddled us with unsustainable debt and entitlements, and if 2.3 million people leave the workforce, then the rest of us have to make those entitlements up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn.....Obamacare & American Collectivism rolled into one....  guiding us to a lower standard of living.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.