Jump to content

fanhood

Members
  • Content count

    2,265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About fanhood

  • Rank
    SuperUser

Profile Information

  • Team
    San Diego State
  • Gender
    Male
  1. Both are correct. We have many SR starters, and a very young two deep.
  2. Fair enough. But why is that? I would think that both parties would like that game to happen once in a five year period.
  3. I think Boise will go 9-3 this year. They will lose two conference games (Colorado State and one other random game), and will probably lose to Washington State @ Wazzu. They will represent the conference will in the Potato Bowl, and will watch Colorado State lose to SDSU in San Diego for the Championship.
  4. Nevada fans, think back to the 2010 football season

    Hawaii should never have fired McMackin. What a stupid decision.
  5. Murray puts SDSU in his AP Top 25

    Boise will be ranked if they beat Troy soundly.
  6. Murray puts SDSU in his AP Top 25

    Sounds about right.
  7. Please Stop Implying - No Home for Aztecs

    Use the search function, dumbass. Also, read the links High and Tight gracious provided you.
  8. Please Stop Implying - No Home for Aztecs

    No, smart guy. I have already provided this evidence. I will quote myself so that you can read it again: I have commented on this topic for months, and laid out the scenarios. All information has been based on actually reading the law, the initiative, as well as other open sources pieces of information. You however, clearly have not. I. Already. Have. Laid. Out. This. Information. How is this hard to understand? You have now proved, that you cannot read critically. So why would I waste time re-writing something that has already been written. Educate yourself.
  9. Season Ticket Sales

    Sorry, no chance. Only if the team was sold, could this possibility ever exist.
  10. San Diego State Chicken

    http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/aztecs/sd-sp-azfoot-chickenpox-0815-story.html Up to five confirmed. Rumors are running rampant that the number is actually up to 15.
  11. Please Stop Implying - No Home for Aztecs

    I have made zero wild claims. I simply said that your post indicated that you had no understanding of the situation. I have commented on this topic for months, and laid out the scenarios. All information has been based on actually reading the law, the initiative, as well as other open sources pieces of information. You however, clearly have not. Thus, your opinion is not to be respected nor considered.
  12. Please Stop Implying - No Home for Aztecs

    Ah, there you go. I see now. You have an agenda. Take High n Tight's advice and educate yourself. Read some articles. Investigate the details of the law. Hell, read some posts on this board. Nobody has time to rehash and correct every false statement you make.
  13. Please Stop Implying - No Home for Aztecs

    This shows you have not been following closely.
  14. Ha! Wait, what? Is it disrespectful to point to the fact that guaranteed contracts are what is hurting ESPN, when people irrationally claim the AAC will get $8 million a year? Is it disrespectful to call people delusional, when they claim the "Access Bowl is ours" after only going to it once in three years? Is it disrespectful to point to the MW record of 5-5 (or 6-5 depending on how you look at it) against the AAC, when people claim the AAC is a better football conference? If so, you sir, are indeed delusional when it comes to this topic. You should not take that as disrespect. My best friends and I appreciate when we constructively point out each others flaws. Good night.
×